Cited by 44Sport Psychology and PerformanceSports Performance and TrainingHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Effects of increasing and decreasing physiological arousal on anticipation timing performance during competition and practice

Open access
Duncan, Michael J., Smith, Mike, Bryant, Elizabeth, Eyre, Emma, Cook, Kathryn, Hankey, Joanne, Tallis, Jason, Clarke, Neil +1 more·2016·European Journal of Sport Science

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate if the effects of changes in physiological arousal on timing performance can be accurately predicted by the catastrophe model. Eighteen young adults (8 males, 10 females) volunteered to participate in the study following ethical approval. After familiarisation, coincidence anticipation was measured using the Bassin Anticipation Timer under four incremental exercise conditions: Increasing exercise intensity and low cognitive anxiety, increasing exercise intensity and high cognitive anxiety, decreasing exercise intensity and low cognitive anxiety and decreasing exercise intensity and high cognitive anxiety. Incremental exercise was performed on a treadmill at intensities of 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% heart rate reserve (HRR) respectively. Ratings of cognitive anxiety were taken at each intensity using the Mental Readiness Form 3 (MRF3) followed by performance of coincidence anticipation trials at speeds of 3 and 8 mph. Results indicated significant condition × intensity interactions for absolute error (AE; p =. 0001) and MRF cognitive anxiety intensity scores (p =. 05). Post hoc analysis indicated that there were no statistically significant differences in AE across exercise intensities in low–cognitive anxiety conditions. In high–cognitive anxiety conditions, timing performance AE was significantly poorer and cognitive anxiety higher at 90% HRR, compared to the other exercise intensities. There was no difference in timing responses at 90% HRR during competitive trials, irrespective of whether exercise intensity was increasing or decreasing. This study suggests that anticipation timing performance is negatively affected when physiological arousal and cognitive anxiety are high.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17461391.2014.979248

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Competitive anxiety can negatively affect sports performance and increase injury risk.

    “Competitive anxiety is a common psychological challenge among athletes and can negatively affect sports performance.”

    From The Effect of Different Psychological Interventions on Athletes' Competitive Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis. (2026) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) reports that performance decrements were worst when cognitive anxiety and physiological arousal were highest, supporting the claim that anxiety can negatively affect performance. Our copy does not support the added claim about injury risk or establish how common competitive anxiety is among athletes. The verbatim citing sentence does not include the injury-risk claim. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Payne, V. G. (1986). The effects of stimulus runway length on coincidence anticipation timing performance. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 12, 289-295.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duncan, M. J., Smith, M., Bryant, E., Eyre, E., Cook, K., Hankey, J., Tallis, J., Clarke, N., & Jones, M. V.
Affiliations
  • Coventry (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • University of Staffordshire (GB)
Corresponding author
Duncan, Michael J.
Venue
European Journal of Sport Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-12-03
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
27-35
ISSN
  • 1536-7290 (ISSN-L)
  • 1746-1391
OpenAlex
W2052553081
Cited by
44
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Sport Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Coventry University Open Collections (Coventry university) (submittedVersion)
  • The Open Collections (Coventry University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
timing performance, physiological arousal, cognitive anxiety, catastrophe models, heart rate reserve, treadmill running
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Arousal, Female, Humans, Male, Task Performance and Analysis, Exercise, Young Adult, Anticipation, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review