Cited by 10Sport Psychology and PerformanceMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Effects of mindfulness intervention on competition state anxiety in sprinters—a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Yu, Ming Ge, Dou, Guang Bo, Gong, Chen·2024·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Objectives: With the rapid growth of China’s sprint program’s international competitiveness, the psychological problems of sprinters have become a common concern in sports training theory and practice. Hence, the study examined the impact of a 7-week Mindfulness training program on competition state anxiety in Chinese sprinters. Methods: Twenty-four sprinters (M age = 22.46 ± 1.351) were selected in a 2 × 3 mixed design, with the group (mindfulness/control) as the between-subjects variable and test time (pre-test/mid-test/post-test) as the within-subjects variable. The dependent variables corresponded to the mindfulness score and competition state anxiety score. One 60-min session was conducted once a week for 7 weeks, and the control group did not undergo any psychological training. The mindfulness group received mindfulness training, and the control group received regular psychological guidance. The subjects filled in the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) and the Competition State Anxiety Scale at baseline, followed by additional assessments 3 weeks and 7 weeks later. Results: (1) In terms of competition state anxiety, there were no significant differences in the pre-test between the mindfulness group and the control group. There were significant differences in sprinters’ competition state anxiety after mindfulness intervention in terms of time, group, and the interaction between time and groups ( p = 0.03, 0.004, and 0.009). (2) In terms of the mindfulness level, the difference between the mindfulness group and the control group was not significant in the pre-test. The sprinters’ mindfulness level was significant in the interaction between groups and that between groups and time after mindfulness intervention ( p = 0.027 and 0.028). Conclusion: Mindfulness training alleviated sprinters’ competition anxiety by reducing sprinters’ somatic state anxiety (SSA) and cognitive state anxiety (CSA), as well as improving state self-efficacy. The results provide guidance and references for Chinese sprinters’ psychological problems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1418094

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Gang Yan S. Ge Zi Z. Ning S. Qing Chun Z. (2014). The origin of ideas and content design of mindfulness training programs for Chinese athletes. Chin. J. Sports Med. 33, 58– 63. doi: 10.16038/j.1000-6710.2014.01.012 · DOI
  2. Hao Y. (2021). Several multi-factor experimental design and statistical analysis methods are applied in sports research. J. Beijing Sport Univ. 33, 75– 78. doi: 10.19582/j.cnki.11-3 · DOI
  3. Hongren C. YaPing Z. (2022). Diagnosis of key techniques and optimization of training strategies of outstanding female 100 m hurdlers in China. J. Henan Normal Univ. 50, 148– 156. doi: 10.16366/j.cnki.1000-2367.2022.05.021 · DOI
  4. Jing W. Zhi Q. Jin Hua L. (2018). Stress and the phenomenon of “choking”: a systematic analysis based on process theory. Sports Sci. 38, 19– 34. doi: 10.16469/j.css.201812003 · DOI
  5. Kabat-Zinn J. (2013) The foundation of mindfulness practice: attitudes commitment. London: Routledge.
  6. Xiao Li Z. Cheng Liang L. Bi Zhen L. Ming Xin Z. Xin Lei W. (2022). Reality review and path selection of the development of professional pports internet celebrity phenomenon in the attention economy era. J. Shenyang Sports Inst. 41, 138– 144. doi: 10.12163/j.ssu.20212239 · DOI
  7. Xue Feng Z. (2022). Progress and trends in scientific training for the 100 m sprint—reflections based on exercise biology and methodology. Sports Sci. 42, 3– 11. doi: 10.16469/j.css.202202001 · DOI
  8. Yue Hui Z. Xiangyang M. (2023). The derivative logic, risk scrutiny and avoidance strategies of the Netflixization phenomenon of sports stars. J. Guangzhou Sports Inst. 43, 120– 128. doi: 10.13830/j.cnki.cn44-1129/g8.20 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, M. G., Dou, G. B., & Gong, C.
Affiliations
Northeast Electric Power University (CN)
Corresponding author
Gong, Chen
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2024-10-31
Volume
15
Pages
1418094-1418094
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403961434
Cited by
10
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 2
FWCI
7.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
mindfulness training, sprinters, sport psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review