Cited by 91Sport Psychology and PerformancePsychological Treatments and AssessmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Effects of psychological interventions on competitive anxiety in sport: A meta-analysis

Ong, Nathanael C.H., Chua, Joshua H.E.·2021·Psychology of Sport and Exercise

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101836

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ong, N. C. H., & Chua, J. H. E.
Affiliations
Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Corresponding author
Ong, Nathanael C.H.
Venue
Psychology of Sport and Exercise
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
52
Pages
101836
ISSN
1469-0292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3094712094
Cited by
91
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 6
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology of sport and exercise (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
competitive anxiety, psychological intervention, athletes, cognitive anxiety, somatic anxiety, self-confidence, anxiety levels, sport psychology, anxiety reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review