“Where are you?” An observational exploration of parental technoference in public places in the US and Israel
Abstract
Recent studies point to the heavy rate of smartphone use by parents while they are accompanied by their children in public places This, in turn, leads to parental technoference, which raises concerns regarding children’s safety and their emotional wellbeing. Accordingly, the present study aims to ascertain the cross-cultural manifestations of parental technoference due to mobile phone use in playgrounds and eateries in two different national contexts: the US and Israel. Parents with children aged 2 to 6 years old were selected for observations. In the US we conducted 27 observations in playgrounds and 30 observations in eateries. In Israel, we conducted 20 observations in playgrounds and 38 observations in eateries. Our data suggest that during phone use, parents ignore children’s interactional initiatives and convey lack of attention and care to the point of sometimes being inattentive to their safety and emotional needs. Children, on their part, expressed frustration and disappointment, which are manifested at times in different forms of inappropriate or risky behavior, or withdrawal from any attempt to communicate with their parents.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Very absorbed parents tended to be positioned away from their children, to cease to have eye contact with them, and to fail to pay attention to their children's emotional distress, accomplishments, attempts to communicate, and safety.
“Very absorbed parents tended to be positioned away from their children, to cease to have eye contact with them and to fail to pay attention to their children's emotional distress, to their accomplishments, their attempts to communicate, and ultimately also to their safety.”
From Smartphones in the nursery: Parental smartphone use and parental sensitivity and responsiveness within parent–child interaction in early childhood (0–5 years): A scoping review (2021) · cites this paper as Elias et al., 2020
Children reacted to their parents' absorption in smartphones by expressing frustration or disappointment, avoidance of interaction, or by trying to get their parents' attention through disruptive behaviors.
“Children reacted to their parents’ absorption in their smartphones by expressing frustration or disappointment, avoidance of interaction, or by trying to get their parents’ attention through disruptive behaviors.”
From Smartphones in the nursery: Parental smartphone use and parental sensitivity and responsiveness within parent–child interaction in early childhood (0–5 years): A scoping review (2021) · cites this paper as Elias et al., 2020
When strongly absorbed in their devices, parents tended to miss children's bids for communication or to be less emotionally supportive and overall to be less sensitive.
“When strongly absorbed in their devices, parents tended to miss children's bids for communication or to be less emotionally supportive (Elias et al., 2020) and overall to be less sensitive (Wolfers et al., 2020).”
From Smartphones in the nursery: Parental smartphone use and parental sensitivity and responsiveness within parent–child interaction in early childhood (0–5 years): A scoping review (2021) · cites this paper as Elias et al., 2020
The displacement hypothesis implies that time spent on a digital device reduces opportunities to show sensitive parenting and sustain attuned parent-child interactions, which was the case in the study by Elias et al. (2020) in eateries and on playgrounds both in the United States and in Israel.
“With regard to our research question, this hypothesis would imply that time spent on a digital device reduces opportunities to show sensitive parenting and sustain attuned parent–child interactions, which was the case in the study by Elias et al. (2020) in eateries and on playgrounds both in the United States and in Israel.”
From Smartphones in the nursery: Parental smartphone use and parental sensitivity and responsiveness within parent–child interaction in early childhood (0–5 years): A scoping review (2021) · cites this paper as Elias et al., 2020
Parents' overall well-being as well as personality factors such as introversion or proneness to addictive behaviors may contribute to parental phone use behaviors.
“Maybe parents’ overall well‐being as well as personality factors such as introversion or proneness to addictive behaviors contribute to parental phone use behaviors, too, because both on playgrounds and in restaurants, amount of smartphone‐use time varied greatly between parents (e.g., see Elias et al., 2020; Wolfers et al., 2020).”
From Smartphones in the nursery: Parental smartphone use and parental sensitivity and responsiveness within parent–child interaction in early childhood (0–5 years): A scoping review (2021) · cites this paper as Elias et al., 2020
Some parents used their smartphones for a considerable amount of time while spending time with their children on playgrounds and in eateries, or reported a high daily technology use time while spending time with their children.
“Some parents used their smartphones for a considerable amount of time while spending time with their children on playgrounds and in eateries (e.g., Elias et al., 2020) or reported a high daily technology use time while spending time with their children (Stockdale et al., 2020).”
From Smartphones in the nursery: Parental smartphone use and parental sensitivity and responsiveness within parent–child interaction in early childhood (0–5 years): A scoping review (2021) · cites this paper as Elias et al., 2020
Cites
Exposure and use of mobile media devices by young children
Kabali, H. K., Irigoyen, M. M., Nunez-Davis, R., Budacki, J. G., Mohanty, S. H., Leister, K. P., & Bonner, R. L. (2015) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2015-2151 · Cited by 1,053 · see citing works
Technoference: Parent distraction with technology and associations with child behavior problems
McDaniel, B. T., & Radesky, J. S. (2018) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12822 · Cited by 617 · see citing works
Mobile device use when caring for children 0‐5 years: A naturalistic playground study
Mangan, E., Leavy, J. E., & Jancey, J. (2018) · Health Promotion Journal of Australia · doi:10.1002/hpja.38 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Braune‐Krickau, K., Schneebeli, L., Pehlke‐Milde, J., Gemperle, M., Koch, R., & von Wyl, A. (2021) · Infant Mental Health Journal · doi:10.1002/imhj.21908 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Zhang, J., Dong, C., Jiang, Y., Zhang, Q., Li, H., & Li, Y. (2023) · Psychology Research and Behavior Management · doi:10.2147/prbm.s417718 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
- Authors
- Elias, N., Lemish, D., Dalyot, S., & Floegel, D.
- Affiliations
- Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Corresponding author
- Elias, Nelly
- Venue
- Journal of Children and Media
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-08-26
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 376-388
- ISSN
- 1748-2798 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-2801
- OpenAlex
- W3082930525
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11
- FWCI
- 11.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Children and Media (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- United States–Israel Binational Science Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Impacts
- Keywords
- child safety, children's emotional well-being, parent-child interaction, playgrounds, cross-cultural comparison, United States, Israel
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review