Cited by 51Child Development and Digital TechnologyImpact of Technology on AdolescentsEducational Methods and Impacts

Mobile device use when caring for children 0‐5 years: A naturalistic playground study

Open access
Mangan, Elsa, Leavy, Justine E., Jancey, Jonine·2018·Health Promotion Journal of Australia

Abstract

Issue addressed: Over the past decade, mobile device use has increased significantly. Adults are now using their mobile device whilst undertaking a range of work and social activities. This naturalistic study aimed to understand parents/carers’ use of mobile devices and their associated beliefs about mobile device use whilst caring for children aged five and younger in playgrounds. Methods: A mixed methods approach was used to collect quantitative and qualitative data from parents/carers. Data were collected by observations (n = 50) and interviews (n = 25) in playgrounds on the North Coast of New South Wales, Australia. Results: Of the 50 observed parents/carers, 76% (n = 38) used their mobile device, with usage time extending to 17.2 minutes of the 20 minute observation period. Text‐/type‐related mobile device use was most often used (69.6%), followed by voice‐related (23.7%) and camera‐related mobile device use (6.7%). The 25 interviewed parents/carers beliefs on mobile device use were centred on three themes: diversity of mobile device use, child relationships and mobile device use and the physical environment and mobile device use. Conclusion: This study adds to the limited research into parent/carer mobile device use, which has become an integral part of peoples’ lifestyle. However, research is required to better understand how parent/carer mobile device use may impact on child supervision and interaction. So what?: Mobile device use is increasing. We need to better understand its public health impact.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hpja.38

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mangan, E., Leavy, J. E., & Jancey, J.
Affiliations
Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Jancey, Jonine
Venue
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-03-05
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
337-343
ISSN
  • 1036-1073 (ISSN-L)
  • 2201-1617
OpenAlex
W2794356050
Cited by
51
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3
FWCI
16.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Promotion Journal of Australia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Curtin University of Technology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Impacts
Keywords
mobile device use, parents, caregivers, children under five, playgrounds, child supervision, parent-child interaction, text messaging, voice calls, camera use, physical environment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Interviews as Topic, Male, New South Wales, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Photography, Play and Playthings, Caregivers, Cell Phone, Young Adult, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review