Cited by 53Assistive Technology in Communication and MobilityTechnology Use by Older AdultsDown syndrome and intellectual disability research

Smart-speaker technology and intellectual disabilities: agency and wellbeing

Open access
Smith, Elizabeth, Sumner, Petroc, Hedge, Craig, Powell, Georgina·2023·Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Mainstream intelligent personal assistants (IPAs, e.g., Amazon Echo and Google Home) offer an unprecedented opportunity to enhance agency and wellbeing among vulnerable groups across health and social care. However, unintended consequences and barriers to use are possible. MATERIALS AND METHODS: = 22). Semi-structured interviews on device use and daily life were conducted with individuals with ID. Observation surveys were also collected from support staff. Key themes were identified using thematic analysis. We also collected quantitative agency and wellbeing data. A separate group of 40 individuals who had already received IPAs were additionally assessed, as well as their support staff. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: (1) social value, (2) entertainment, (3) perceived agency, (4) challenges, perseverance, training/support needs. Opinions regarding IPAs were overwhelmingly positive. Most individuals qualitatively reported improved sense of agency and IPAs enabled many individuals to access features associated with wellbeing, but there was no significant change in the quantitative measure. Some individuals experienced challenges related to pronouncing and remembering IPA phrases; however, perseverance was common. CONCLUSIONS: This study increases our understanding of the ways smart speakers can be used to enhance life quality among individuals with ID, and the nature of barriers faced. In conclusion, IPAs are cost-effective complementary support for vulnerable populations, but additional training is required to realize all potential benefits.Implications for rehabilitationIndividuals with intellectual disability (ID) in supported living are able to use mainstream smart-speakers to access features associated with supporting wellbeing and social communication.They also reported that smart speakers made them feel better able to do things for themselves.A number of individuals with ID and their support staff identified a need for training and support to get the most out of smart speakers in future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17483107.2020.1864670

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Voice assistants hold the potential to significantly enhance older adults' quality of life and autonomy.

    “even though they hold the potential to significantly enhance older adults' quality of life and autonomy [5, 56].”

    From Situated Understanding of Errors in Older Adults' Interactions with Voice Assistants: A Month-Long, In-Home Study (2026) · cites this paper as [56]

    The introduction (section 1; page unavailable) says voice assistants may improve quality of life and agency across health and social care. But the paper studies people with intellectual disabilities; its remarks about older adults concern positive attitudes toward smart technology and willingness to trade privacy for autonomy, not demonstrated improvements in their quality of life or autonomy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, E., Sumner, P., Hedge, C., & Powell, G.
Affiliations
Cardiff University (GB)
Corresponding author
Smith, Elizabeth
Venue
Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
Published
2020-12-30
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
432-442
ISSN
  • 1748-3107 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-3115
OpenAlex
W3113892470
Cited by
53
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7
FWCI
7.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Health and Care Research Wales Fellowship (SCF-18-1524)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Keywords
smart speakers, virtual assistants, intellectual disability, agency, well-being, supported living, assistive technology, social communication, support staff training, technology adoption barriers, Amazon Echo, Google Home
MeSH terms
Communication, Humans, Intellectual Disability, Quality of Life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review