The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Everyday ethics in professional life: social work as ethics work
Open accessAbstract
This article outlines and develops the concept of ‘ethics work’ in social work practice. It takes as its starting point a situated account of ethics as embedded in everyday practice: ‘everyday ethics’. This is contrasted with ‘textbook ethics’, which focuses on outlining general ethical principles, presenting ethical dilemmas and offering normative ethical frameworks (including decision-making models). ‘Ethics work’ is a more descriptive account of ethics that refers to the effort people put into seeing ethically salient aspects of situations, developing themselves as good practitioners, working out the right course of action and justifying who they are and what they have done. After identifying seven features of ethics work, including work on framing, roles, emotion, identity, reason, relationships and performance, each element is illustrated with reference to two case examples from social work practice. It is argued that the concept of ethics work, with its focus on the practitioners as moral agents in context, is an important antidote to the rules-based managerialism of much contemporary practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497 · cited 2×
“…for example seeing the bigger picture of social inequality of which a 1 Kahneman comments that he and Tversky used the term ‘framing’ both to refer to the formulation to which decision-makers are exposed and the interpretation they construct for themselves (Kahneman and Tversky, 1981, p. xiv).”
BackgroundThe emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Haidt, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814 · Cited by 8,048
Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions
Nussbaum, M. C. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840715 · Cited by 4,347
Upheavals of thought: the intelligence of emotions
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-4883 · Cited by 3,163
Research works printed but not linked: 67
- Appiah K. A., 2008, Experiments in Ethics
- Aristotle, 1954, The Nichomachean Ethics of Aristotle.
- 10.1515/9781400846320 · DOI
- Banks S., 2004, Ethics, Accountability and the Social Professions, 10.1007/978-1-137-11536-2 · DOI
- 10.1093/bjsw/bcn099 · DOI
- Banks S., 2009, Ethics and Social Welfare, 3, 55
- 10.18352/jsi.260 · DOI
- Banks S., 2012, Ethics and Values in Social Work, 10.1007/978-0-230-37592-5 · DOI
- 10.1080/13691457.2012.732931 · DOI
- Banks S., 2014, Ethics, 1
- Banks S., 2009, Ethics in Professional Life: Virtues for Health and Social Care, 10.1007/978-1-137-07769-1 · DOI
- Banks S., 2012, Practising Social Work Ethics Around the World: Cases and Commentaries
- 10.1093/bjsw/bch199 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/17496535.2010.484265 · DOI
- Beauchamp T., 2009, Principles of Biomedical Ethics
- 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9780511624605 · DOI
- Bondi L., 2011, Towards Professional Wisdom: Practical Deliberation in the People Professions
- Edmonds D., 2014, Would You Kill the Fat Man? The Trolley Problem and What Your Answer Tells Us about Right and Wrong
- Foucault M., 2000, Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth: The Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, 1, 281
- Foucault M., 2000, Ethics: Subjectivity and truth: The Essential Works of Foucault 1954–184, 1, 253
- 10.17763/haer.47.4.g6167429416hg5l0 · DOI
- Goffman E., 1969, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life
- Goffman E., 1974, Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organisation of Experience
- Goldie P., 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Haidt J., 2013, The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion
- Halford S., 1999, Professionals and the New Managerialism in the Public Sector, 102
- Hall C., 2014, Language Practices in Social Work: Discourse in Practice
- Hall C., 1997, The Construction of Professional Discourse, 265
- Hall C, 2006, Language Practices in Social Work: Categorisation and accountability in child welfare
- Hauser M., 2006, Moral Minds: How Nature Designed our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong
- Held V., 2006, The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global
- Hochschild A., 1983, The Managed Heart: Commercialisation of Human Feeling
- Hochschild A., 2003, The Commercialisation of Intimate Life: Notes from Home and Work, 10.1525/9780520935167 · DOI
- Hugman R., 2005, New Approaches in Ethics for the Caring Professions, 10.1057/978-0-230-21170-4 · DOI
- Kahneman D., 2011, Thinking, Fast and Slow
- Kahneman D., 1981, Science, 221, 453
- 10.1093/bjsw/bcu057 · DOI
- 10.1080/17496535.2013.774040 · DOI
- 10.1080/17496531003608154 · DOI
- Kline R., 2012, Professional Accountability in Social Care and Health: Challenging Unacceptable Practice and its Management
- 10.1080/17496535.2010.484255 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2010.00704.x · DOI
- Levy N., 2008, American Journal of Bioethics, 2, 3
- 10.1093/bjsw/32.8.1015 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/jme.2006.018580 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511487118 · DOI
- Richland J., 2010, Ordinary Ethics; Anthropology, Language and Action, 249
- Sacks H., 1992, Lectures on Conversation (edited by G. Jefferson)
- Schön D., 1994, Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies
- 10.1016/S0260-6917(96)80092-X · DOI
- Smith P., 2012, The Emotional Labour of Nursing Revisited: Can Nurses Still Care?, 10.1007/978-0-230-35631-3 · DOI
- 10.1177/00187267035610001 · DOI
- 10.1093/0199253889.001.0001 · DOI
- Tascón S., 2010, Ethics and Value Perspectives in Social Work, 85, 10.1007/978-0-230-31357-6_8 · DOI
- Taylor C., 2006, Critical Reflection in Health and Social Care Maidenhead, 73
- Taylor C., 2000, Practising Reflexivity in Health and Welfare
- Toulmin S., 2001, Return to Reason
- Tronto J., 1993, Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care
- 10.1080/17496535.2012.704058 · DOI
- Vetlesen A., 1994, Perception, Empathy and Judgment: An Inquiry into the Preconditions of Moral Performance
- Walker M., 2007, Moral Understandings: A Feminist Study in Ethics
- Watson T., 2007, Organisation, 15, 121
- 10.1007/s10728-010-0165-5 · DOI
- 10.1080/10428231003781774 · DOI
- 10.1177/0957926513508855 · DOI
- Wooffitt R., 2005, Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: A Comparative and Critical Introduction, 10.4135/9781849208765 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Witter, S. J. (2025) · Social Work Education · doi:10.1080/02615479.2024.2371373 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Banks, S.
- Affiliations
- Durham University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Banks, Sarah
- ORCID
- Banks, Sarah
- Venue
- Ethics and Social Welfare
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-01-02
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-52
- ISSN
- 1749-6535 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-6543
- OpenAlex
- W2234888738
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5
- FWCI
- 36.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2016-12-09)
- Open access
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Ethics and Social Welfare (publishedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
- Keywords
- everyday ethics, social work practice, moral agency, professional identity, ethical decision-making, managerialism, ethical dilemmas, practitioner role, professional relationships
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Everyday ethics in professional life: social work as ethics work. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/17496535.2015.1126623
- The paper
- Banks, S. (2016). Everyday ethics in professional life: social work as ethics work. Ethics and Social Welfare. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2015.1126623