Cited by 5Narrative Theory and AnalysisCinema and Media StudiesCinema History and Criticism

The function of narrative in interactive documentary

Reeder, Jake Chapman·2021·Studies in Documentary Film

Abstract

Interactive documentary theory has oversimplified concepts of narrative in order to accentuate the contrast between traditional documentary and interactive documentary. In doing so, there is a risk of imagining the interactive documentary as an impermeable and incomprehensible artefact, resistant to hermeneutic examination. This paper will show that by approaching the question of narrative coherence as a phenomenological proposition, a theory of narrative can be developed which is able to account for interactive documentary traits which are not shared with traditional documentaries. In order to reimagine the role of narrative in interactive documentary, the philosophical approach of Paul Ricoeur will be adapted and extended. Ricoeur’s combination of phenomenology and hermeneutics encourages a nuanced and philosophically rigorous approach to narrative, which helps us expand on the role of narrative in interactive documentary.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17503280.2020.1815124

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Aarseth Espen., 2003, The New Media Reader, 762
  2. Brasier Hannah., 2017, Digital Media and Documentary: Antipodean Approaches, 13
  3. Keen Seth., 2017, Digital Media and Documentary: Antipodean Approaches, 49
  4. Miles Adrian., 2006, Journal of Digital Information, 2, 1
  5. Ricoeur Paul., 1986, Time and Narrative
  6. Ricoeur, Paul. 2002. “Life in Quest of Narrative.” In On Paul Ricoeur, edited by David Wood, 20–33. London: Taylor & Francis, 2002.
  7. Thalhofer Florian., 2017, Planet Galata
  8. Whitelaw Mitchell., 2002, Halfeti: Only Fish Shall Visit
  9. Wiehl Anna., 2016, NECSUS, 5, 177

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Reeder, J. C.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Reeder, Jake Chapman
Venue
Studies in Documentary Film
Published
2020-09-17
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
220-237
ISSN
  • 1750-3280 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-3299
OpenAlex
W3087532999
Cited by
5
References
17
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
7.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Studies in Documentary Film (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Cinema and Media Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Cinema History and Criticism
Keywords
interactive documentary, narrative, narrative coherence, Paul Ricoeur, phenomenology, hermeneutics, narrative theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review