Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“Not Their Fault, but Their Problem”: Organizational Responses to the Online Harassment of Journalists

Holton, Avery E., Bélair-Gagnon, Valérie, Bossio, Diana, Molyneux, Logan·2023·Journalism Practice

Abstract

Journalists are increasingly reporting that online harassment has become a common feature of their working lives, contributing to experiences of fatigue, anxiety and disconnection from social media as well as their profession. Drawing on interviews with American newsworkers, this study finds at least three distinct forms of harassment: acute harassment such as generalized verbal abuse, chronic harassment occurring over time and often from the same social media users and escalatory harassment that is more personalized and directly threatening. Women journalists said they especially are experiencing chronic and escalatory forms of harassment. Journalists also discussed a perceived lack of systemic efforts on the part of news organizations to address such harassment, leaving journalists to search for preventative and palliative coping mechanisms on their own. Such labor may be driving journalists’ disconnection from social media as well as the profession of journalism and highlights a growing need for news organizations to address harassment as a systemic, rather than individual, issue. The mental health and well-being of journalists may depend on such action, especially at a time when more journalists are reporting fatigue, burnout, and a desire to exit the profession.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17512786.2021.1946417

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. 10.1177/2158244016629394 · doi:10.1177/2158244016629394
  2. 10.1515/1565-3404.1283 · doi:10.1515/1565-3404.1283
  3. 10.1080/17512786.2018.1542975 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1177/1464884919872076 · DOI
  5. 10.4324/9781315270449-26 · doi:10.4324/9781315270449-26
  6. 10.1111/josi.12086 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Chadha Kalyani, 2017, International Communication Research Journal, 52, 1+
  8. 10.1177/1464884918768500 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1080/21670811.2017.1419821 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1080/14680777.2015.1008750 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/978-3-319-72917-6_7 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/978-3-319-72917-6_16 · DOI
  13. García V. H. R., 2019, Frontera Norte, 31
  14. 10.1016/S0740-8188(03)00005-7 · doi:10.1016/s0740-8188(03)00005-7
  15. 10.4324/9781315561240 · doi:10.4324/9781315561240
  16. Jamil Sadia, 2019, Handbook of Research on Combating Threats to Media Freedom and Journalist Safety
  17. 10.1080/17512786.2020.1725599 · DOI
  18. 10.17645/mac.v8i1.2541 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/soc4.12677 · doi:10.1111/soc4.12677
  20. 10.4018/978-1-7998-6686-2.ch009 · DOI
  21. 10.4324/9780367810139 · DOI
  22. 10.1080/17512786.2013.859840 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1057/9781137022479 · DOI
  24. 10.1177/1461444814544002 · DOI
  25. 10.1080/17512786.2016.1164614 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Martin Fiona., Australian Journalism Review, 40, 73
  27. Martin Angela, 2018, International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 39, 88
  28. 10.1177/1354856513501413 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/1744-7941.12046 · doi:10.1111/1744-7941.12046
  30. 10.1111/1744-7941.12046 · doi:10.1111/1744-7941.12046
  31. 10.1177/1464884919899016 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1080/09585192.2012.723022 · DOI
  33. 10.1177/2056305119872950 · DOI
  34. 10.1080/21670811.2014.906927 · DOI
  35. 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1314532 · DOI
  36. 10.1080/14680777.2015.1105275 · DOI
  37. 10.1177/1464884914560306 · doi:10.1177/1464884914560306
  38. Örnebring, Henrik. 2018. Journalists thinking about precarity: Making sense of the “new normal”. In International Symposium on Online Journalism (Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 109–127). · doi:10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0156
  39. 10.1017/iop.2019.15 · DOI
  40. 10.17645/mac.v6i4.1519 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1080/17512786.2020.1776141 · DOI
  42. 10.1080/21670811.2016.1155967 · DOI
  43. Salin Denise., 2009, Personnel Review, 39, 88
  44. Staudinger Ursula M., 2011, Zeitschrift Für ArbeitsmarktForschung, 44, 295
  45. 10.1177/0018726719846262 · DOI
  46. Treven Sonja, 2007, Kybernetes, 39, 88
  47. 10.1086/225193 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1080/21670811.2020.1818111 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Holton, A. E., Bélair-Gagnon, V., Bossio, D., & Molyneux, L.
Venue
Journalism Practice
Published
2021-07-05
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
859-874
ISSN
  • 1751-2786 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-2794
OpenAlex
W3191393191
Cited by
202
References
3
FWCI
35.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “Not Their Fault, but Their Problem”: Organizational Responses to the Online Harassment of Journalists. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/17512786.2021.1946417
The paper
Holton, A. E., Bélair-Gagnon, V., Bossio, D., & Molyneux, L. (2023). “Not Their Fault, but Their Problem”: Organizational Responses to the Online Harassment of Journalists. Journalism Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1946417

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.