Cited by 16Mental Health Research TopicsSchizophrenia research and treatmentSurvey Methodology and Nonresponse

Compliance in experience sampling methodology: the role of demographic and clinical characteristics

Hartley, Samantha, Varese, Filippo, Vasconcelos e Sa, Debora, Udachina, Alisa, Barrowclough, Christine, Bentall, Richard P., Lewis, Shôn W., Dunn, Graham +2 more·2014·Psychosis

Abstract

Objective: Experience sampling (ES) involves participants rating ambulant phenomena at unpredictable intervals. Despite its perceived benefits, there is little published research evaluating the limitations of this method. Method: Predictors of compliance were investigated across three studies using ES in psychotic populations. Results: Regression analyses indicated that none of the demographic or clinical variables significantly (p .05) predicted the number of valid reports or compliance as defined by traditionally used cut-off points ( 33%). Conclusions: We conclude that it is difficult to predict compliance in ES research, which is likely to be an accessible methodology, even for people experiencing distressing symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17522439.2012.752520

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hartley, S., Varese, F., Vasconcelos e Sa, D., Udachina, A., Barrowclough, C., Bentall, R. P., Lewis, S. W., Dunn, G., Haddock, G., & Palmier-Claus, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Division of Clinical Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Hartley, Samantha
Venue
Psychosis
Published
2013-01-10
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
70-73
ISSN
  • 1752-2439 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-2447
OpenAlex
W2011522504
Cited by
16
References
7
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychosis (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Keywords
ecological momentary assessment, compliance, predictors of compliance, demographic factors, clinical features, methodological limitations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review