Cited by 52Mental Health Research TopicsSurvey Methodology and NonresponseMedication Adherence and Compliance

Compliance in ambulatory assessment studies: investigating study and sample characteristics as predictors

Open access
Ottenstein, Charlotte, Werner, Linda·2022·Assessment

Abstract

Ambulatory assessment (AA) studies are becoming more and more popular. However, it can be challenging to motivate participants to comply with study protocols. The aim of the present study was to investigate possible predictors of compliance in AA studies with diverse samples and study designs. To do so, we extracted compliance information, study characteristics, and sample characteristics from 488 previously published studies. The average compliance across the studies was rather high. The total number of measurement occasions and the number of study days were negatively related to the compliance rate. Moreover, a higher percentage of healthy controls in clinical studies was associated with a higher compliance rate. By contrast, other study characteristics (e.g., the amount of financial compensation) and sample characteristics (clinical vs. healthy sample) were not related to compliance. The findings have implications for the design of future AA studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/10731911211032718

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ottenstein, C., & Werner, L.
Affiliations
University of Koblenz and Landau (DE)
Corresponding author
Ottenstein, Charlotte
Venue
Assessment
Published
2021-07-20
Volume
29
Issue
8
Pages
1765-1776
ISSN
  • 1073-1911 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3489
OpenAlex
W3183980449
Cited by
52
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
FWCI
7.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Assessment (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
Keywords
ambulatory assessment, compliance, participant motivation, predictors of compliance, study characteristics, sample characteristics, financial compensation, research design
MeSH terms
Ecological Momentary Assessment, Humans, Patient Compliance, Research Design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review