The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
User acceptance of mobile health services from users’ perspectives: The role of self-efficacy and response-efficacy in technology acceptance
Abstract
With the swift emergence of electronic medical information, the global popularity of mobile health (mHealth) services continues to increase steadily. This study aims to investigate the efficacy factors that directly or indirectly influence individuals' acceptance of mHealth services. Based on the technology acceptance model, this research incorporates efficacy factors into the acceptance decision process. A research model was proposed involving the direct and indirect effects of self-efficacy and response-efficacy on acceptance intention, along with their moderating effects. The model and hypotheses were validated using data collected from a field survey of 650 potential service users. The results reveal that: (1) self-efficacy and response-efficacy are both positively associated with perceived ease of use; and (2) self-efficacy and response-efficacy moderate the impact of perceived usefulness toward adoption intention. Self-efficacy and response-efficacy both play an important role in individuals' acceptance of mHealth services, which not only affect their perceived ease of use of mHealth services, but also positively moderate the effects of perceived usefulness on adoption intention. Our findings serve to provide recommendations that are specifically customized for mHealth service providers and their marketers.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These constructs were measured using 21 items adapted from the work of Zhang et al. [75] and Chung and Dong [76], with each factor represented by three specific indicators.”
From Advancing Undergraduate Student Mental Healthcare of Social Anxiety Disorder: Evaluating the Acceptance of AR-Assisted Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Through TAM-Based Constructs. (2026) · cites this paper as Zhang et al. [75]
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Venkatesh, V. (2000) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 · Cited by 6,664
Modern Methods for Business Research
(1998) · doi:10.4324/9781410604385 · Cited by 6,534
Putting the fear back into fear appeals: the extended parallel process model
Witte, K. (1992) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637759209376276 · Cited by 3,880
Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparison approach
Chau, P. Y. K., & Hu, P. J. (2001) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2001.tb00978.x · Cited by 1,409
Mobile computing acceptance factors in the healthcare industry: a structural equation model
Wu, J.-H., Wang, S.-C., & Lin, L.-M. (2007) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.06.006 · Cited by 603
A brief intervention changing oral self-care, self-efficacy, and self-monitoring
Schwarzer, R., Antoniuk, A., & Gholami, M. (2015) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12091 · Cited by 159
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- Istepanian RSH, 2003, Some imperative notes on m-health
- 10.1089/tmj.2014.0166 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.im.2013.03.001 · DOI
- 10.1089/tmj.2013.0092 · DOI
- 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000717 · DOI
- Adams DA, Nelson RR, Todd PA. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly 1992:227–47:0276–7783. · DOI · Paper page
- Venkatesh V, 2003, MIS Quarterly, 27, 0276, 10.2307/30036540 · DOI · Paper page
- Yu C-S., 2012, Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 13, 104
- 10.1016/j.im.2003.12.013 · DOI
- Park I, 2015, Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 382
- 10.1089/dia.2014.0341 · DOI
- Nour MM, 2015, JMIR Research Protocols, 4, e92, 10.2196/resprot.4665 · DOI
- 10.1089/tmj.2013.0080 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12525-010-0043-x · DOI
- 10.1007/s10916-010-9600-2 · DOI
- Johnston AC, 2010, MIS Quarterly, 34, 0276, 10.2307/25750691 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.elerap.2015.11.001 · DOI
- Kapoor K, 2014, Piercy N, Lal B, Weerakkody V. RFID integrated systems in libraries: Extending TAM model for empirically examining the use. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 27, 731
- 10.1002/mar.10045 · DOI
- Fishbein M, 1975, Belief, attitude
- 10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122 · DOI · Paper page
- Bandura A., 1986, Social foundations of thought and action
- 10.2307/249688 · DOI · Paper page
- Huang Y-C, Tsay W-D, Huang C-H, Lin Y-H, Lai M-C, editors. The influence factors of electronic bill presentment and payment—A case study of mobile phone bill2011: IEEE.
- 10.1287/isre.11.4.418.11876 · DOI
- 10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/25750694 · DOI
- 10.1108/ITP-12-2012-0147 · DOI
- 10.2307/249008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1197/jamia.M1475 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.07.006 · DOI
- 10.2307/25750691 · DOI
- Gefen D, Straub DW, Boudreau MC. Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of AIS 2000;7(7):1–78. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/002224378101800104 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/002224378101800104 · DOI · Paper page
- Okazaki S, 2015, Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 16, 194
- Ng S-N, 2015, Electronic Journal of Health Informatics, 9, e7
- Hanus B, 2016, Wu YA. Impact of users’
- 10.1016/j.im.2012.04.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.013 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 204
Gupta, S., & Singh, A. (2024) · International Studies of Management & Organization · doi:10.1080/00208825.2024.2442191 · Cited by 8
“Correspondingly, Zhang et al. (2017) investigated efficacy factors, which directly or indirectly influences individual acceptance of m-health services, and confirmed the moderation of self-efficacy in PU and adoption intention.”
Mohammed, A., & Rózsa, Z. (2024) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-11-2023-0989 · Cited by 12
Silvera‐Tawil, D., Cameron, J., Li, J., Varnfield, M., Allan, L., Harris, M., Lannin, N. A., Redd, C. B., & Cadilhac, D. A.-M. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/54604 · Cited by 12
“Finally, the constructs of attitude toward a digital support program were adapted from the technology acceptance model, previously validated and commonly used in mHealth studies with both patients and clinicians [35-37].”
Subjective Effects of Using a Passive Upper Limb Exoskeleton for Industrial Textile Workers
Capodaglio, E., Amitrano, F., Coccia, A., Gabba, V., Pagano, G., D'Addio, G., & Panigazzi, M. (2024) · Safety · doi:10.3390/safety10030059 · Cited by 7
“This perception of advantage would also represent an important factor in counteracting the development of disabilities resulting from musculoskeletal disorders [36,37].”
BackgroundPromoting new users’ online health consultation services usage behavior strategically
Chen, A. H., Chu, W., & Peng, N. (2024) · Health Marketing Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07359683.2024.2340196 · Cited by 7
“Experts have suggested that this might also be applicable to the use of OHCSV (Liu et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2016).”
Mantik, T. V. R., Kandouw, D. D., Karouwan, N. G., & Simanjuntak, E. R. (2024) · Journal Of World Science · doi:10.58344/jws.v3i2.534 · Cited by 11
“On the other hand, previous research states that perceived ease of use (PEOU) is influenced by self-efficacy and the belief that a system provides convenience in its capabilities (Ozturk, 2016); (Zhang et al., 2017).”
BackgroundChudhery, M. A. Z., Safdar, S., Rehman, H.-U., Rafique, R., Ali, M., & Li, F.-G. (2022) · Technology Analysis & Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2022.2117598 · Cited by 7
Choi, E., Park, J., & Kang, S.-W. (2021) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare9091157 · Cited by 7
“This is similar to a study [37] that demonstrated that the acceptance of mobile healthcare services may affect self-efficacy.”
ResultOakey-Neate, L., Schrader, G., Strobel, J. E., Bastiampillai, T. J., van Kasteren, Y., & Bidargaddi, N. P. (2020) · BMJ Health & Care Informatics · doi:10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100084 · Cited by 8
Yu, T., Tian, Y., Huang, Q., Cheng, Z., & Zhang, R. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1735913 · Cited by 8
Sofyani, H., Amalia, R., Hasan, H. A., & Saleh, Z. (2025) · Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies · doi:10.1108/jaee-12-2024-0538 · Cited by 6
von Winckelmann, C., Vanherle, R., Schreurs, L., Hoogmartens, O., Salaets, H., Spiegeleer, J. D., Sabbe, M. B., & Beullens, K. (2025) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/69934 · Cited by 6
“The absence of a link with self-efficacy is surprising, as it contradicts studies on CTAs [18,26] and other mHealth technologies [46,47], where self-efficacy often emerged as a strong predictor, sometimes even the strongest.”
Eneh, S. C., Onukansi, F. O., Ikhuoria, O. V., & Ojo, T. O. (2024) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/s12936-024-05134-3 · Cited by 6
“A study conducted in China suggests that perceived ease of use significantly influences perceived usefulness [28].”
BackgroundUnderstanding customer attitude toward advergames: an extended TAM approach
Pour, M. J., Kazemi, Z., & Moeini, H. (2023) · Arts and the Market · doi:10.1108/aam-01-2022-0001 · Cited by 14
Chen, J., Li, T., You, H., Wang, J., Peng, X., & Chen, B. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20043247 · Cited by 8
Huang, Y., Obada-Obieh, B., Redmiles, E. M., Lokam, S., & Beznosov, K. (2022) · Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3498366.3505756 · Cited by 6
“As the best-known approach, the TAM has been examined, expanded, and applied to many domains, such as online shopping [142], implicit authentication on smartphones [94], and mobile health apps [17, 26, 35, 96, 108, 163].”
BackgroundChen, J., & Allman-Farinelli, M. A. (2018) · Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2018.01.002 · Cited by 7
Gong, Y., Guo, Y., Zhang, T., Zhu, X., & Wang, L. (2026) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.106121 · Cited by 6
Li, F., Abdullah, M. E. Z., & Tan, T. G. (2026) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-025-10048-5 · Cited by 5
“Lastly, this study investigated Learning Motivation and Cognitive Load, but additional constructs, such as social influence and technological self-efficacy, could also impact adoption (Beldad & Hegner, 2018; Sung et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2017).”
Nguyen, T. T., Tran, V. T. T., Hermoso, E., & Hoang, M. T. T. (2025) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2025.102928 · Cited by 4
Miyazaki, A. D., & Haderlie, T. C. (2025) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-01-2025-0041 · Cited by 5
Alsyouf, A., Al-Momani, A. M., Alsubahi, N., Lutfi, A., Al-Mugheed, K., Almaiah, M. A., Anshasi, R. J., Alolayyan, M., Alsaad, A., & Alrawad, M. (2025) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076251336271 · Cited by 5
“26,69 Related studies have examined the impacts of perceived usefulness on the intention to use mHealth and DCT tools; to begin with Zhang et al. 70 found a positive association between the variable and using mHealth, while Binyamin and Zafar 71 found PU to have a signi fi cant in fl uence over…”
Scaling out a Digital-First Behavioral Health Care Model to Primary Care
Youn, S. J., Schuler, K. L., Sah, P., Jaso, B. A., Pennine, M., O’Dea, H., Eyllon, M., Barnes, J. B., Murillo, L., Orth, L., et al. (2025) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-025-01433-2 · Cited by 5
“Various prototypes of training content, slides, and deliv - ery modes were also discussed with the goals of increasing provider self-efficacy (Zhang et al., 2017) in having a PBH referral discussion with patients.”
Hashemi, P., Reychav, I., Arora, A., Sawaed, N., Sabherwal, R., & Azuri, J. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.108005 · Cited by 5
Sulistyaningrum, I. H., Pribadi, P., & Sari, S. (2023) · Pharmacia · doi:10.3897/pharmacia.70.e105724 · Cited by 5
Maddah, M., Esmaeilzadeh, P., & Mirzaei, T. (2023) · Information Systems Management · doi:10.1080/10580530.2023.2237187 · Cited by 9
“As computer self-efficacy plays an important role in adopting health apps (Zhang et al., 2017), we argue that individuals with higher computer self-efficacy may have higher confidence to explore a health app.”
BackgroundSafdari, R., Shahmoradi, L., Garavand, A., Aslani, N., Valipour, A., & Bostan, H. (2018) · Hospital Practices and Research · doi:10.15171/hpr.2018.28 · Cited by 8
Pang, W. M., Liew, T. W., Tan, S.-M., Teo, S. C., Lee, Y. Y., & Lim, T. Q. (2024) · World Symposium on Software Engineering (WSSE) · doi:10.1145/3698062.3698093 · Cited by 3
“Zhang et al. [69] reported a positive association between self-efficacy and perceived ease of use, while also noting its significant moderation of the impact of perceived usefulness on adoption intention in mHealth.”
Sarini, M., Actis-Grosso, R., Magrin, M. E., Mari, S., Olivero, N., Paganin, G., & Simbula, S. (2022) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare10050888 · Cited by 5
Romano, K. A., Heron, K. E., Wilsey, C. N., Wright, S., & Cramer, R. (2021) · Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s41347-021-00233-3 · Cited by 4
“In line with the content, wording, and constructs targeted within measures that have been used in previous research (Downs et al., 2019; Rupp et al., 2018; Shin & Biocca, 2017; Zhang et al., 2017), participants were asked to endorse six mHealth technology perceptions and usage motivations items that were developed for…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialFox, R. J., Symmons, S. M., Brún, A. D., Joyce, D., Muldoon, E. G., McGinty, T., O’Reilly, K. M., O’Connor, E., & McAuliffe, É. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051408 · Cited by 4
Community Safety Behavior in Response to Coronavirus Pandemic
Khan, R., Fatima, T., Ramayah, T., Awan, T., & Kayani, Z. K. (2021) · Illness, crises, and loss · doi:10.1177/10541373211033962 · Cited by 4
“Extant literature supports this significant relationship (Mukhtar, 2020a; Tweneboah-Koduah, 2018; Zhang et al., 2017), therefore, the study hypothesizes the direct relationship between perceived self-efficacy and the individual’s safety behavior.”
BackgroundKeikhosrokiani, P. (2021) · Int. J. E Adopt. · doi:10.4018/ijea.2021070104 · Cited by 4
Li, G.-Z., Seo, J.-H., & Park, E.-M. (2020) · Personal and Ubiquitous Computing · doi:10.1007/s00779-020-01473-5 · Cited by 4
Tamara, D., Maharani, A., Heriyati, P., Rienaldy, A., Ramadhan, A., Rizky, D., & Widyawan (2023) · E3S Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202342601006 · Cited by 4
From perception to intention: how new technology shapes metro rail commuters’ digital pass adoption
Chowdhury, R., & Hoque, I. (2025) · Strategic Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.sbr.2025.100029 · Cited by 3
Afrianty, T., Raharjo, K., Prakasa, Y., & Abimanyu, A. (2025) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2025.2547085 · Cited by 3
“For instance, Zhang et al. (2017), Pan (2020), and Khoa (2023) demonstrated that self-efficacy is a critical determinant of individuals’ perceived ability to engage with emerging technologies. this connection is particularly relevant in Malang Raya, where many drivers may have limited exposure to…”
Exploring the moderating role of age and gender in adopting mHealth services
Alam, M., Gani, M., & Barua, Z. (2025) · Online information review (Print) · doi:10.1108/oir-07-2021-0385 · Cited by 3
Examining attributes of Indian travelers’ revisitation intent toward sustainable hotels
Gulati, K., Sharma, D., & Vrat, P. (2025) · Journal of Advances in Management Research · doi:10.1108/jamr-10-2024-0384 · Cited by 3
Ma, Q., Tham, J. S., Bidin, R. B. H., & Zainudin, S. S. S. (2025) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076251349618 · Cited by 3
“75 Han et al. 76 contended that the perceived utility of COVID-19 prevention and treatment information fully mediated the in fl uence of self-ef fi cacy on the intention to adopt the information.”
The Impact of Self-Efficacy on Telemedicine Adoption in Emerging Country
Hoonsopon, D., Ketkaew, C., Puriwat, W., Viriyasitavat, W., & Tripopsakul, S. (2025) · HighTech and Innovation Journal · doi:10.28991/hij-2025-06-01-09 · Cited by 3
“For telemedicine adoption, a three-item measure is modified from Dam et al. (2018) and Zhang et al. (2017) [5, 7].”
InfluentialΣκάλκος, Α., Tsohou, A., Karyda, M., & Kokolakis, S. (2023) · Information and Computer Security · doi:10.1108/ics-08-2022-0142 · Cited by 7
User Acceptance of Password Manager Software: Evidence from Australian Microbusinesses
Jamil, H., Zia, T. A., & Nayeem, T. (2021) · Journal of Information Security and Cybercrimes Research · doi:10.26735/kpob8473 · Cited by 3
Ramadhan Akhmad, T., & Rachbini Didik, J. (2021) · Dinasti International Journal of Management Science · doi:10.31933/dijms.v3i2.1048 · Cited by 3
“Zhang et al (2017) specifically in their research explain that Perceived Ease of Use has a significant effect on Perceived Usefulness.”
BackgroundRamírez-Rivas, C., Alfaro-Perez, J. L., Ramírez-Correa, P., & Mariano-Melo, A. (2020) · Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies · doi:10.23919/cisti49556.2020.9140996 · Cited by 3
“A reactive telemedicine system is one where an individual can contact a doctor through their mobile rather than having to attend an in-person consultation [9].”
BackgroundOn the perspective of doctors’ intention—a hybrid BYOD model
Nisar, S., Osman, W. R. B. S., Wahab, A. B. A., & Aslam, M. S. (2025) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-025-12801-x · Cited by 2
“An individual's belief in his or her skills to complete a behaviour has positively influenced the mobile health system [117].”
A Trust-Based Theoretical Model to Determine Adoption of Telemedicine Services
Harris, M. A., Chin, A., Smith, J. N., & Baxi, C. (2025) · Journal of Computational Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2025.2551576 · Cited by 2
Zhu, Y., Lai, Y. K., Xie, Q., Wang, J. Z., You, F., & Zhao, X. (2025) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2025.2526020 · Cited by 3
“While some studies suggest that health technology may predict self-efficacy (Ilioudi et al., 2010; Long & Stevens, 2004), a substantial body of prior research indicates that self-efficacy may predict the use of health IT (Ceylan et al., 2022; Tetri & Juujärvi, 2022; Zhang et al., 2017).”
InfluentialZhang, L., Xia, J., Chen, H., Bai, Y., Wang, J., Wang, L., & Ren, W. (2025) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/78397 · Cited by 2
“Moreover, the knowledge related to this health information and interactions can increase patients’involvement and engagement [25].”
Alghazo, S. H. A., Humaidi, N., & Abdullah, N. (2025) · Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.34190/ejkm.23.2.3895 · Cited by 2
“The same is applicable when considering accepting technology (Zhang et al. , 2017).”
Li, S.-S., Xu, J., Jiang, Y., Walters, G., & Lehto, X. Y. (2024) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/00472875241288852 · Cited by 2
“…have offered empirical evidence of the implications of the two factors in understanding a broad spectrum of themes, such as technology acceptance (Zhang et al., 2017), perceived communication effectiveness (D. Han et al., 2016), and inevitably, risk perceptions and treatment to the greatest…”
Undergraduate Students’ Entrepreneurial Attitude and Self-employment Intentions
Kisubi, M. (2021) · SEISENSE Business Review · doi:10.33215/sbr.v1i2.626 · Cited by 2
“For instance, according to Zhang et al. (2017), self-efficacy has a significantly positive moderating effect on the relationship between perceived usefulness and adoption intention of mobile health services.”
BackgroundEvaluating End-User Perception Towards a Cardiac Self-care Monitoring Process
Casalino, G., Castellano, G., Pasquadibisceglie, V., & Zaza, G. (2020) · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49289-2_4 · Cited by 3
Consumer Behavior Toward Health‐Related Mobile Applications: A Hybrid Review and Future Agenda
Çelebi, Ö. F., Kabadayı, E. T., Aksoy, N. C., & Alan, A. K. (2026) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.70153 · Cited by 1
Mobile Health Adoption in Developing Countries: A Study in Iran
Ashkani, M. (2026) · International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications · doi:10.1155/ijta/5525487 · Cited by 1
Li, Y., Shen, T. H., Yang, S., & Chen, X. (2025) · Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research · doi:10.3390/jtaer20040287 · Cited by 1
Käferböck, A.-S., Hayotte, M., Sieber, D., Pillei, M., & Wald, M. (2025) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/64701
“…through an adapted TAM questionnaire containing 29 items distributed across 6 dimensions—perceived usefulness (6 items) [17], perceived ease of use (6 items) [18], behavioral intention to use (4 items) [16], social influence (5 items) [17], trust (3 items) [14], and perceived risk (5 items) [16].”
Ding, X., Marchand, K., Holsti, L., Schmidt, J., Parde, N., Sakakibara, B. M., & Barbic, S. P. (2025) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076251365073
Wang, Z. C., Ma, M., Xia, X., Li, M. M., Zhao, X., & Ao, S. H. (2025) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076251376287 · Cited by 1
Jairam, D., Swathi, K. S., & Nayak, S. (2025) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.160126.3
Zeng, K., Dong, L., Xu, Y., & Zheng, X. (2024) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076241281214 · Cited by 1
Perception and Usage of Telemedicine Among National Health Insurance Participants in Padang City
Roza, S. H., & Sari, A. F. (2023) · Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat · doi:10.26553/jikm.2023.14.2.281-292 · Cited by 3
“…services for patients and users are expected to periodically update information on healthcare services, which should improve their telemedicine services, such as consultation and information, by using mobile health services; however, it is easy for patients or users to access and understand 21 .”
BackgroundKahriz, B. M., Snuggs, S. J., Sah, A., Clot, S., Lamport, D. J., Forrest, J., Helme-Guizon, A., Wilhelm, M.-C., Caldara, C., Anin, C. V., et al. (2023) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/44993 · Cited by 1
“Higher self-efficacy is also related to a higher intention to use mobile health services [48].”
BackgroundGao, Y.-J., Wong, S.-L., Khambari, M. N., & Noordin, N. (2021) · International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences · doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i9/10856 · Cited by 1
“SE has a direct influence on the user's behavioral intention to use technology (Banas & York, 2014; Zhang et al., 2017) and PEU (Mei, Brown, & Teo, 2018).”
BackgroundChudhery, M. A. Z., Safdar, S., Li, F.-G., Rehman, H.-U., Rafique, R., Huo, J.-Z., & Gao, L. (2020) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-109637/v1 · Cited by 1
Fauzi, R., Permanasari, A., & Fauziati, S. (2025) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2025.0160810 · Cited by 1
“[12], [14], [18], [20], [26], [27], [30], [32], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [41], [45], [46], [51], [54], [59], [60], [62], [64], [66], [68], [70], [72], [73], [80], [85], [91] Health & IT Literation The user's difficulty in using m-health devices due to low health literacy or education suggests…”
O'Hare, G., O'Grady, M., Akan, O., O'Donoghue, J., & Henn, P. (2020) · International ICST Conference on Wireless Mobile Communication and Healthcare · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49289-2 · Cited by 1
Citizen science for malaria control in Rwanda : Engagement, motivation, and behaviour change
Asingizwe, D. (2020) · doi:10.18174/526218 · Cited by 2
“The association between response efficacy and perceived ease of use of mobile health services was revealed by Zhang et al. (2016 ).”
BackgroundZhou, Z., Zhou, Y., Ouyang, B., Man, S. S., & Chan, A. H. S. (2026) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare14131978
“These constructs were measured using 21 items adapted from the work of Zhang et al. [75] and Chung and Dong [76], with each factor represented by three specific indicators.”
Testing Restorative Narratives in a College Student Resilience Project
Ray, E. C., Arpan, L. M., Oehme, K., Perko, A., & Clark, J. J. (2019) · Innovative Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10755-019-9464-4 · Cited by 10
From understanding resistance to fostering acceptance: how mindsets impact GenAI adoption
Wieland, J., Keating, L. A., & Mohnen, A. (2026) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2026.2706666
Predictors of Mobile Health App Acceptance Among Nurses in Kashan, Iran: Cross-Sectional Study
Mirabootalebi, N., Holl, F., Swoboda, W., Tagharrobi, Z., Jeddi, F. R., & Akbari, H. (2026) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/93888
“…roles for health care professionals, including task mobility, individual performance, technological maturity [19], self-efficacy, responsiveness [41], organizational support, environmental and organizational influences, adaptability [17], and acceptance of MHA; however, these factors were not…”
Emmanuel, P. A., Coburn, K. O., Parra, G. R., & Dalla, R. L. (2026) · Telemedicine Journal and e-Health · doi:10.1177/15305627261472295
“All statistical analyses were completed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), Version 29.”
Factors predicting the intentions to use mHealth applications for mental wellness
Padaliya, D., Arya, B., Bisht, V., Sharma, M. R., & Kumar, H. (2026) · Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment · doi:10.1080/10911359.2026.2703853
Beyond adoption: integrating TTAT and user-centric design for mHealth service continuance
Kumar, N., Murthy, K. K. S. V., Moorthy, V., Upreti, K., & Singh, S. (2026) · Journal of Health Organization and Management · doi:10.1108/jhom-05-2025-0283 · Cited by 1
Li, J., Chan, H. Y. L., Ye, Z., Qi, X., Chien, W. T., & Chow, K. M. (2026) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0001555
“Our observation that self-efficacy was positively associated with acceptance of LLMs in healthcare aligns with mHealth research [25], while links to conscientiousness and rest intolerance imply that LLM-based tools may be perceived as efficient channels for health information processing [26].”
Zhao, Y., Wang, Z., Ke, F., & Ma, X. (2026) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare14131892
“…such as technological facilitators (e.g., perceived usefulness, ease of use, and convenience) [8,9], personal attributes (e.g., self-efficacy and age) [10,11], and external influences (e.g., social support) [12,13], thereby contributing to our understanding of MHIS adoption among older adults.”
Mouloudj, K., Njoku, A., Bouarar, A., Asanza, D. M., Evans, M. A., & Baviskar, S. (2026) · Geriatrics · doi:10.3390/geriatrics11040076
Tahira, A., Mohamed, M. H. N., Elnaem, M. H., Hashmi, F. K., & Bukhari, N. I. (2026) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/20523211.2026.2682340
“(Bashir et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2017).”
Exploring mobile health service adoption among diabetic patients using an integrated UTAUT-PMT model
Saputra, R., Adhy, S., & Yasin, H. (2026) · Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics · doi:10.11591/eei.v15i3.9998
“Unlike prior hybrid frameworks such as UTAUT2-HBM [17] or PMT-TAM [12], this study uniquely integrates UTAUT’s cognitive determinants with PMT’s coping-appraisal components to capture both technological and psychological readiness among diabetic patients.”
InfluentialFostering response efficacy: The democratic implications of virtual reality
Jennings, F. J., Gilliland, D., & Jones, R. (2026) · Communication and Democracy · doi:10.1080/27671127.2026.2659617
Kim, M. J., & Chong, H. J. (2026) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076261466801
“25,34 Therefore, in this study, AI competency was adopted as a theoretically aligned proxy for perceived ease of use, an extended construct encompassing the essence of ease of use.”
Theile, F., Schaal, T., Mäder, M., & Schoenfelder, T. (2025) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-025-25472-4
“To enhance DSCI adoption, interventions could incorporate elements that strengthen self-efficacy, such as clear guidance, positive feedback, and gradual goal setting [47].”
Zhao, X.-R., Wu, Y.-B., Zhang, X.-X., Chen, P., & Sun, X. (2025) · Chinese General Practice Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cgpj.2025.100089
Self-citationMorimoto, M. (2025) · International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijphm-01-2025-0004 · Cited by 1
Contact-Tracing App Acceptance Decisions are Multifaceted and Entangled
van Schaik, P., Renaud, K. V., Campbell, M., & Pigera, S. (2025) · Digit. Gov. Res. Pract. · doi:10.1145/3765625
Huang, Y., Junping, G., Wen, Y., & Fan, Q. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1629272
Lau, B. H. P., Shum, E. N.-Y., & Yoon, J. (2025) · Journal of Applied Gerontology · doi:10.1177/07334648251349907
“Higher household income, education, and technological pro fi ciency are associated with more intention to use mobile and wearable health devices (Chandrasekaran et al., 2020, 2021; Fowe & Boot, 2022; Zhang et al., 2017).”
Astuti, S. P., Aisyah, D. N., Prasetiyawan, A. A., Fravisdha, F. V., Hermawan, A. H., Pramono, A. J. B., & Diamonda, S. A. (2025) · Energy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1016/j.esd.2024.101639
Patil, K., Pramod, D., Mitra, S., Sarma, S., Sodagiri, P., & Saraswat, S. (2025) · 2025 Fifth International Conference on Advances in Electrical, Computing, Communication and Sustainable Technologies (ICAECT) · doi:10.1109/icaect63952.2025.10958930
“This includes the efficacy of deepfake detection methods and education and awareness initiatives [8].”
Analyzing User Experience and User Satisfaction: Evaluating User Acceptance of the Halo Hermina App
Sabara, E., Mahendra, & Riana, D. (2024) · Journal Medical Informatics Technology · doi:10.37034/medinftech.v2i3.45
“Additionally, individual characteristics such as age, gender, and prior smartphone experience play a role in moderating these relationships [2].”
BackgroundGamification in personal health record systems: a regulatory fit perspective
Taşbaş, E. H. O., Yildirim, B. F., & Attila, M. R. (2024) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2024.2370312
“The intention of participants to adopt was assessed using the three-item scale which was originally developed by Zhang et al. (2017).”
Public Perception of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Protective Measures in Nigeria
Mbah, P., & Kim, D. K. D. (2024) · Communicatio · doi:10.1080/02500167.2024.2405900
“It also refers to the degree of belief in whether the recommended responses ensures avoidance of the threat (Brooks and Bubela 2020; of mobile health services in China, Zhang et al. (2016) response efficacy as a cognitive process that focuses on the formation of thoughts regarding an individual’s appraisal of his or h…”
InfluentialNoyan, B., Si̇dan, D., Balci, H., Kabak, K., & Sevim, E. (2022) · Türkiye sağlık bilimleri ve araştırmaları dergisi · doi:10.51536/tusbad.1131901
Pannard, M., Leroy, T., Escriva-Boulley, G., Bernetière, C., Desfriches, O., Paquienséguy, F., & Préau, M. (2022) · Bulletin du Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bulcan.2022.04.016
van Bussel, M. V., Odekerken-Schröder, G., Ou, C., Swart, R., & Jacobs, M. (2022) · doi:10.2196/preprints.36535
Juneja, S., & Kumar, A. (2021) · Indian Journal of Community Health · doi:10.47203/ijch.2021.v33i03.020
Shirish, A. (2021) · Advances in marketing, customer relationship management, and e-services book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-7263-4.ch012 · Cited by 2
Koch, R., Wetzel, A., Preiser, C., Müller, R., Klemmt, M., Ranisch, R., Ehni, H.-J., Wiesing, U., Rieger, M. A., Henking, T., et al. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-383127/v1
Clarke, M. A., Fruhling, A., Lyden, E. L., Tarrell, A. E., Bernard, T., & Windle, J. (2020) · doi:10.2196/preprints.19191
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, X., Han, X., Dang, Y., Meng, F., Guo, X., & Lin, J.
- Affiliations
- Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
- Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Xiaofei
- Venue
- Informatics for Health and Social Care
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-08-26
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 194-206
- ISSN
- 1753-8157 (ISSN-L)
- 1753-8165
- OpenAlex
- W2508383655
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 15.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Informatics for Health and Social Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (71471048, 71531007, 71471049)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Keywords
- mobile health, mHealth adoption, user acceptance, self-efficacy, response efficacy, technology acceptance model, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, adoption intention, moderating effect
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attitude to Computers, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Perception, Telemedicine, Self Efficacy, Intention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review