Cited by 37Electronic Health Records SystemsMedical Coding and Health InformationMachine Learning in Healthcare

Increasing knowledge of mental illness through secondary research of electronic health records: opportunities and challenges

Open access
Spiranovic, Caroline, Matthews, Allison, Scanlan, Joel, Kirkby, Kenneth C.·2016·Advances in Mental Health

Abstract

Aim/Purpose: The primary use of electronic health records (EHRs) is in the care of the individual patient. Secondary research uses employ information in EHRs for purposes beyond that of care of the individual. Secondary research uses may broadly be divided into studies which focus on improving care and treatment of individuals and those which aim to increase knowledge about disease causes, associations and prevalence at a population level. This paper provides a review of studies that have used EHRs to increase knowledge at a population level. It examines the methods used, types of research conducted, difficulties and challenges faced and implications for future research and mental health research in particular.Method: A review was undertaken based on a search for peer-reviewed and recently (i.e. since 2005) published articles with full-text available online.Findings/Results: The studies which have used EHRs to increase knowledge have predominantly involved; (1) data mining to identify biomarkers and gene–disease associations, (2) epidemiological research using linked/merged health records and (3) surveillance, prediction and alerts for diseases/illnesses. The principal methodological challenges identified were data quality, discrepancies/inconsistencies in data and interoperability of EHRs.Conclusions: Despite the challenges faced in secondary usage of EHRs, significant research has been undertaken and researchers have proposed and tested various approaches to address methodological issues. The study methods employed in other fields of medical research can be extrapolated to study issues of significance to mental health using EHRs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/18387357.2015.1063635

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It would not be possible, without extensive utilization of EHR, to place in practice a system of effective public health surveillance specially to predict, monitor and manage pandemic like COVID-19.

    “It would not be possible, without extensive utilization of EHR, to place in practice a system of effective public health surveillance specially to predict, monitor and manage pandemic like COVID-19 [58], [82].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spiranovic, C., Matthews, A., Scanlan, J., & Kirkby, K. C.
Affiliations
University of Tasmania (AU)
Corresponding author
Spiranovic, Caroline
Venue
Advances in Mental Health
Published
2015-07-21
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
14-25
ISSN
  • 1446-7984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1838-7357
  • 1837-4905
OpenAlex
W1441192051
Cited by
37
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 4
FWCI
5.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Advances in Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
electronic health records, secondary research, mental illness, data mining, biomarkers, gene-disease association, linked health records, disease surveillance, data quality, interoperability, mental health research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review