The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Making the user more efficient: design for sustainable behaviour
Open accessAbstract
User behaviour is a significant determinant of a product's environmental impact; while engineering advances permit increased efficiency of product operation, the user's decisions and habits ultimately have a major effect on the energy or other resources used by the product. There is thus a need to change users' behaviour. A range of design techniques developed in diverse contexts suggest opportunities for engineers, designers and other stakeholders working in the field of sustainable innovation to affect users' behaviour at the point of interaction with the product or system, in effect ‘making the user more efficient’. Approaches to changing users' behaviour from a number of fields are reviewed and discussed, including: strategic design of affordances and behaviour‐shaping constraints to control or affect energy‐ or other resource‐using interactions; the use of different kinds of feedback and persuasive technology techniques to encourage or guide users to reduce their environmental impact; and context‐based systems which use feedback to adjust their behaviour to run at optimum efficiency and reduce the opportunity for user‐affected inefficiency. Example implementations in the sustainable engineering and ecodesign field are suggested and discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The café at CIRS employs both constraining (e.g., no bottled drinks are available for purchase and all utensils are compostable) and suggestive approaches (e.g., persuasive signs which explain where the food comes from) which could be shaping and influencing user behavior.”
From A Sustainable Building Promotes Pro-Environmental Behavior: An Observational Study on Food Disposal (2013) · cites this paper as [20]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“it also actively and intentionally embodies and promotes a message of sustainability.”
From A Sustainable Building Promotes Pro-Environmental Behavior: An Observational Study on Food Disposal (2013) · cites this paper as [20]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms
Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2007) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x · Cited by 3,643
The Psychology of Everyday Things
Massaro, D. W., & Norman, D. A. (1990) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1423268 · Cited by 3,484
Norman, D. A., & DRAPER, S. W. (1986) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b15703 · Cited by 3,154
Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion
Cialdini, R. B. (1993) · Cited by 2,563
Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do
Fogg, B. J. (2002) · Ubiquity · doi:10.1145/764008.763957 · Cited by 1,554
Zero Quality Control: Source Inspection and the Poka-Yoke System
Shingo, S. (1986) · Cited by 576
Arroyo, E., Bonanni, L., & Selker, T. (2005) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1054972.1055059 · Cited by 178
Lewis, C., & Norman, D. A. (1995) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-051574-8.50071-6 · Cited by 132
Bång, M., Torstensson, C., & Katzeff, C. (2006) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11755494_18 · Cited by 119
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Energy joule [online]
- Chalkley A. M., 2001, Design methods for performance and sustainability (13th international conference on engineering design, 693
- Chase R. B., 2007, Mistake‐proofing: designing errors out
- 2003, Revolutionary new lampholder for energy‐efficient home lighting [online]
- Ernevi A., 2005, Proceedings of nordic design research conference ‘In the Making’
- Fischer J., Watt watchers system diagram [online]
- STATIC! Increasing energy awareness [online]
- Jelsma J., 2000, Proceedings of the international summer academy on technology studies, 121
- Kesan J. P., 2006, Notre Dame Law Review, 82, 583
- Lockton D., 2007, A bright idea? [online]
- Lockton D., 2007, Changing behaviour: water meter taps [online]
- Lockton D., 2008, What is design with Intent? [online]
- Morgan M. G., 1997, The industrial green game, 200
- 1989, Poka‐Yoke: improving product quality by preventing defects
- 2002, Approved Document L1, Conservation of Fuel and Power [online]
- How to use Eco Kettle [online]
- Sherwin C., 1998, Journal of Sustainable Product Design, 7, 51
- Tefal QuickCup [online]
- 2007, The Engineer
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Long, T. B., Blok, V., & Coninx, I. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.044 · Cited by 498
The design with intent method: A design tool for influencing user behaviour
Lockton, D., Harrison, D., & Stanton, N. A. (2010) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2009.09.001 · Cited by 419
Self-citationDrivers of environmental processes and their impact on performance: a study of Turkish SMEs
Ağan, Y., Açar, M. F., & Borodin, A. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.043 · Cited by 346
Rossi, M., Germani, M., & Zamagni, A. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.051 · Cited by 326
Design for sustainable behaviour: strategies and perceptions
Lilley, D. (2009) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/j.destud.2009.05.001 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Lockton, D., Harrison, D., & Stanton, N.
- Affiliations
- Brunel University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Lockton, Dan
- Venue
- International Journal of Sustainable Engineering
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-8
- ISSN
- 1939-7038 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-7046
- OpenAlex
- W2104910126
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 19.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Sustainable Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
- Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
- Archive of research processes and output produced by RCA (Royal College of Art) (submittedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Pro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes
- Keywords
- user behavior change, sustainable design, eco-design, affordances, feedback, persuasive technology, context-aware systems, energy efficiency, resource efficiency, sustainable innovation, environmental impact of products
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review