Cited by 588Accounting and Organizational ManagementAccounting Theory and Financial ReportingManagement and Organizational Studies

Accounting, organizing, and economizing: connecting accounting research and organization theory

Miller, Peter, Power, Michael·2013·Academy of Management Annals

Abstract

This paper encourages scholars of management to pay attention to the mutually constitutive nature of accounting, organizing, and economizing. This means viewing accounting as much more than an instrumental and purely technical activity. We identify four key roles of accounting: first, territorializing, the recursive construction of the calculable spaces that actors inhabit within organizations and society; second, mediating, that much of what accounting instruments and ideas do is to link up distinct actors, aspiration, and arenas; third, adjudicating, that accounting plays a decisive role in evaluating the performance of individuals and organizations, and also in determining failings and failures; and fourth, that accounting is a subjectivizing practice par excellence, that it both subjects individuals to control or regulation by another, while entailing the presumption of an individual free to choose. The entanglement of these four roles, we suggest, is what gives the “accounting complex” its productive force, such that it is perhaps the most powerful system of representation for social and economic life today in many national settings. We examine these issues through a selective review of the accounting literature based on the construction of two intellectual histories. One deals with the growth of scholarly interest in organizations which created the conditions for a behavioral turn in accounting research and the embedding of accounting within management scholarship. The…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/19416520.2013.783668

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Accounting, understood as long distance control, is seen to reconstitute its objects through translation, transposition, reframing, or interessement.

    “accounting is seen to reconstitute its objects through its capacity to “translate” (Robson, 1992), “transpose” (Knorr-Cetina & Grimpe, 2008), “reframe” (Miller & Power, 2013), or “interess” (Chua, 1995).”

    From Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization (2017) · cites this paper as Miller & Power, 2013

  • Accounting is argued to remake its objects through the ability to corner, capture, stabilize, or close; it envelops its objects and territorializes by fencing in.

    “Accounting, understood this way, is argued to remake its objects through the ability to corner, capture, stabilize, or close: accounting “envelops” its objects (Miller & Power, 2013: 562); it territorializes by fencing in.”

    From Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization (2017) · cites this paper as Miller & Power, 2013: 562

  • Accounting, as a territorializing activity, constructs calculable spaces within organizations and society.

    “Accounting, as a territorializing activity, constructs calculable spaces within organizations and society (Miller and Power, 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, P., & Power, M.
Affiliations
London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Venue
Academy of Management Annals
Published
2013-06
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
557-605
ISSN
  • 1941-6067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-6520
OpenAlex
W4254405447
Cited by
588
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 83 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 4
FWCI
51.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Annals (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Accounting and Organizational Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
accounting, organizational theory, economization, behavioral accounting, analytical economics, accounting metrics, representation, management accounting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review