Accounting, organizing, and economizing: connecting accounting research and organization theory
Abstract
This paper encourages scholars of management to pay attention to the mutually constitutive nature of accounting, organizing, and economizing. This means viewing accounting as much more than an instrumental and purely technical activity. We identify four key roles of accounting: first, territorializing, the recursive construction of the calculable spaces that actors inhabit within organizations and society; second, mediating, that much of what accounting instruments and ideas do is to link up distinct actors, aspiration, and arenas; third, adjudicating, that accounting plays a decisive role in evaluating the performance of individuals and organizations, and also in determining failings and failures; and fourth, that accounting is a subjectivizing practice par excellence, that it both subjects individuals to control or regulation by another, while entailing the presumption of an individual free to choose. The entanglement of these four roles, we suggest, is what gives the “accounting complex” its productive force, such that it is perhaps the most powerful system of representation for social and economic life today in many national settings. We examine these issues through a selective review of the accounting literature based on the construction of two intellectual histories. One deals with the growth of scholarly interest in organizations which created the conditions for a behavioral turn in accounting research and the embedding of accounting within management scholarship. The…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Accounting, understood as long distance control, is seen to reconstitute its objects through translation, transposition, reframing, or interessement.
“accounting is seen to reconstitute its objects through its capacity to “translate” (Robson, 1992), “transpose” (Knorr-Cetina & Grimpe, 2008), “reframe” (Miller & Power, 2013), or “interess” (Chua, 1995).”
From Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization (2017) · cites this paper as Miller & Power, 2013
Accounting is argued to remake its objects through the ability to corner, capture, stabilize, or close; it envelops its objects and territorializes by fencing in.
“Accounting, understood this way, is argued to remake its objects through the ability to corner, capture, stabilize, or close: accounting “envelops” its objects (Miller & Power, 2013: 562); it territorializes by fencing in.”
From Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization (2017) · cites this paper as Miller & Power, 2013: 562
Accounting, as a territorializing activity, constructs calculable spaces within organizations and society.
“Accounting, as a territorializing activity, constructs calculable spaces within organizations and society (Miller and Power, 2013).”
From State, great families, and Buddhism: monasticism as calculation in the fiscal governance of early medieval China (2026) · cites this paper as Miller and Power, 2013
Cites
Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science
Hacking, I. (1983) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814563 · Cited by 4,814 · see citing works
Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1990) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085149000000001 · Cited by 2,877 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…that were amenable to rational knowledge and calculation (Morgan, 2012; Suzuki, 2003), so too a variety of organizations in recent decades have come to be viewed increasingly as economic entities (Burchell, Clubb, & Hopwood, 1985; Hines, 1988; Hirschman, 1977; Miller & Rose, 1990; Tribe, 1978).”
Self-citationBusiness planning as pedagogy: Language and control in a changing institutional field
Oakes, L. S., Townley, B., & Cooper, D. J. (1998) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393853 · Cited by 675 · see citing works
Tracking the numbers: Across accounting and finance, organizations and markets
Vollmer, H., Mennicken, A., & Preda, A. (2009) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2008.06.007 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization
Kornberger, M., Pflueger, D., & Mouritsen, J. (2017) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2017.05.002 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Corporate reporting and accounting for externalities
Unerman, J., Bebbington, J., & O’dwyer, B. (2018) · Accounting and Business Research · doi:10.1080/00014788.2018.1470155 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
How accounting begins: Object formation and the accretion of infrastructure
Power, M. (2015) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2015.10.005 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Self-citationCuckston, T. (2018) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-10-2015-2264 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Management Control and Uncertainty
Otley, D., & Soin, K. (2014) · Management Control and Uncertainty · doi:10.1057/9781137392121_1 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Cuckston, T. (2022) · Critical Perspectives on Accounting · doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2021.102374 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Measuring the gender pay gap: The complexity of HR metrics
Coron, C. (2021) · Employee Relations: The International Journal · doi:10.1108/er-07-2020-0316 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
He, Y., & Deng, C. (2026) · Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management · doi:10.1108/qram-08-2025-0201
- Authors
- Miller, P., & Power, M.
- Affiliations
- London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
- ORCID
- Power, Michael
- Venue
- Academy of Management Annals
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2013-06
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 557-605
- ISSN
- 1941-6067 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-6520
- OpenAlex
- W4254405447
- Cited by
- 588
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 83 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 51.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Annals (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Accounting and Organizational Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Keywords
- accounting, organizational theory, economization, behavioral accounting, analytical economics, accounting metrics, representation, management accounting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review