Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 341

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 155 of the 155 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

More Formally: Rediscovering the Missing Link between Formal Organization and Informal Social Structure

McEvily, Bill, Soda, Giuseppe, Tortoriello, Marco·2014·The Academy of Management Annals

Abstract

Although foundational organization theory recognized the role of both formal and informal elements, for the past two decades scholarship appears to have primarily attended to the role of informal social structures (i.e. social networks) in explaining organizational functioning. This trend, however, has left a disconnect between the literatures on formal organization and informal social structure such that crucial questions and problems at the intersection of the two streams of research have been neglected. In this essay, we make the case for rediscovering the inherent interplay between formal organization and informal social structure given their common basis of interactions in organizations. We argue that by bridging the gap between formal organization and informal social structure scholarship we can advance our understanding of both the origins and evolution of social networks and the design and effective functioning of organizations. As a first step towards achieving greater integration of research on formal organization and informal social structure we: consolidate existing scholarly understanding in this area, profile the few studies that have begun to bridge the disconnect between formal and informal elements, identify conceptual logics for linking formal and informal elements, and propose an agenda for future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19416520.2014.885252

Cites

155 of 155 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 155 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Barnard C., 1938, The functions of the executive
  2. Blau P. M., 1955, The dynamics of bureaucracy
  3. 10.2307/255503 · doi:10.2307/255503
  4. Hage, J. & Aiken, M. (1970).Social change in complex organizations(pp. 30–61). New York: Random House.
  5. Kanter R. M., 1979, Harvard Business Review, 57, 65
  6. Krackhardt D., 1994, Computational Organization Theory, 89, 123
  7. March J. G., 1958, Organizations
  8. Nohria N., 1992, Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action
  9. 10.2307/255000 · doi:10.2307/255000
  10. Schilling M. A., 2005, Strategic management of technological innovation
  11. Simon H. A., 1996, The sciences of the artificial
  12. Tichy N. M., 1979, Academy of Management Review, 4, 507, 10.5465/amr.1979.4498309 · doi:10.5465/amr.1979.4498309 · Paper page
  13. Zaltman G., 1973, Innovations and organizations

Cited by

See all 341

Metadata

Authors
McEvily, B., Soda, G., & Tortoriello, M.
Venue
The Academy of Management Annals
Published
2014-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
299-345
ISSN
  • 1941-6067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-6520
OpenAlex
W4252549790
Cited by
341
References
155
FWCI
34.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: More Formally: Rediscovering the Missing Link between Formal Organization and Informal Social Structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/19416520.2014.885252
The paper
McEvily, B., Soda, G., & Tortoriello, M. (2014). More Formally: Rediscovering the Missing Link between Formal Organization and Informal Social Structure. The Academy of Management Annals. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2014.885252

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.