Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyGender and Feminist StudiesAfrican Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 24 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

“Sex without Sexual Attraction?“: Perceived Sexual Experiences of Indian Sex-favourable Asexuals

Open access

Abstract

Asexuality is not a complete aversion to sex or sexual activity; instead, there are a range of ways that some asexual people engage with sexual activities. The current qualitative study explored the sexual experiences (self-pleasure and partnered activities) of sex-favourable asexuals within the Indian cultural context. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 participants and analysed using thematic analysis. Results revealed how sex-favourable asexuals experience sexual arousal without experiencing ‘sexual attraction’, leading them to engage in sexual activities. Participants understood their sexuality through feeling different from others, followed by self-exploration, resulting in self-acceptance. Further, participants identified self-pleasure as a tool for self-empowerment and stress management, leading to a preference for masturbation over partner-involved sex. Partner-involved sex was primarily due to extrinsic demands (peer pressure, pressure from partner). This study calls attention towards developing inclusive practices, sex education and community awareness about this understudied section of the queer community and, most importantly, enabling representation of their experiences within the academic literature about sex and sexuality.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

This qualitative study explored how 15 Indian sex-favourable asexuals perceive self-pleasure and partner-involved sexual experiences, finding that they can experience sexual arousal without sexual attraction. Participants often preferred self-pleasure for empowerment and stress relief, while partner-involved sex was largely driven by extrinsic pressures and frequently experienced negatively.

Key findings

  • Participants described sexual arousal without sexual attraction, with non-sexual partner qualities such as personality, voice, aesthetic appeal, and emotional bond being more important than sexual attraction.
  • Of the 15 participants, 11 had engaged in both partner-involved sexual activity and self-pleasure, two only in partner-involved sex, and two only in self-pleasure; 10 out of 15 expressed aversion towards partner-involved sexual activities, reporting numbness, blankness, dissatisfaction, disgust, or dissociation.
  • Self-pleasure was framed as biologically driven, a stress-management tool, and an expression of self-love/empowerment, leading to a preference for masturbation over partner-involved sex.
  • Partner-involved sex was primarily motivated by extrinsic factors such as peer pressure, fear of missing out, partner pressure, guilt, and fear of abandonment; one participant was an outlier who reported positive and satisfying partner-involved sex.

Methods

  • Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 participants aged 18–42 years (*M* = 24.86), recruited through purposive and snowball sampling via social media platforms dedicated to the Indian asexual community from August to September 2021.
  • Inclusion criteria required participants to identify as sex-favourable asexuals, be 18+, have had some sexual experience (partnered or self-pleasure), and reside in India; participants were not given a fixed definition of sex-favourable asexuality.
  • Interviews lasted 45–70 minutes, were conducted in English via Zoom, and were analysed using Clarke and Braun’s (2014) inductive thematic analysis, producing five overarching themes.

Limitations

  • The paper states it could not encompass all socioeconomically, culturally, and linguistically diverse individuals within India; it also did not differentiate or explicitly address participants’ sexual and romantic preferences or relationship status.
  • The paper notes that lack of awareness and non-inclusivity of asexuality could considerably impact participants’ experiences, and that the study excluded traumatic sexual experiences and mental health outcomes, potentially constructing an overly positive account.
  • Evident from the text: the sample was small (15), highly educated (all had a bachelor’s degree or higher), English-speaking, and recruited through social media and snowball sampling, limiting generalisability.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19419899.2025.2518977

Cites

108 of 108 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

1 Valid · 4 Not valid · 12 Not checked · 78 Own results and interpretations

40 more claims

Create a free account to see all 95 claims and to verify the 5 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 32
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 26

Create a free account to see these claims.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

2 of 2

Cited works that were retracted

Works this paper cites that were later retracted, from the retraction notices publishers deposit. Major when the notice came out before this paper was published.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Joseph, S. (1996). Gay and lesbian movement in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 31(33), 2228–2233. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4404520
  2. 10.9790/0837-2711012737 · DOI
  3. Pluckhan L. C. (2023). Self-esteem differences between asexual individuals and other sexual orientations [Doctoral dissertation]. Alliant International University. https://www.proquest.com/openview/0231092f66d8c06aa43894be8c01a217/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y

Metadata

Authors
Agrawal, N., Shainy, M. R., Sebastian, J., Srivastava, A., & Scoats, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Christ University (IN)
  • Jain University (IN)
  • Central University of Karnataka (IN)
  • Birmingham City University (GB)
Corresponding author
Agrawal, Nandini
Venue
Psychology & Sexuality
Published
2025-06-19
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
1260-1280
ISSN
  • 1941-9902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-9899
OpenAlex
W4411502541
Cited by
4
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
  • cc-by
  • doi.org/10.1080/policies-text-data-mining (tdm)
Locations
  • Psychology and Sexuality (publishedVersion)
  • Research Square (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues
Keywords
asexuality, sexual experience, self-pleasure, masturbation, self-acceptance, self-empowerment, stress management, peer pressure, Indian culture, queer communities, sex education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

The claim verdicts this report counts are experimental: their accuracy is not yet measured.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-13, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-13 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (qwen3.8-omni-flash).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.