Cited by 70Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchAnimal testing and alternativesImmunotoxicology and immune responses

Safety testing of monoclonal antibodies in non-human primates: Case studies highlighting their impact on human risk assessment

Open access
Brennan, Frank R., Cavagnaro, Joy, McKeever, Kathleen, Ryan, Patricia C., Schutten, Melissa M., Vahle, John, Weinbauer, Gerhard F., Marrer-Berger, Estelle +1 more·2018·mAbs

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are improving the quality of life for patients suffering from serious diseases due to their high specificity for their target and low potential for off-target toxicity. The toxicity of mAbs is primarily driven by their pharmacological activity, and therefore safety testing of these drugs prior to clinical testing is performed in species in which the mAb binds and engages the target to a similar extent to that anticipated in humans. For highly human-specific mAbs, this testing often requires the use of non-human primates (NHPs) as relevant species. It has been argued that the value of these NHP studies is limited because most of the adverse events can be predicted from the knowledge of the target, data from transgenic rodents or target-deficient humans, and other sources. However, many of the mAbs currently in development target novel pathways and may comprise novel scaffolds with multi-functional domains; hence, the pharmacological effects and potential safety risks are less predictable. Here, we present a total of 18 case studies, including some of these novel mAbs, with the aim of interrogating the value of NHP safety studies in human risk assessment. These studies have identified mAb candidate molecules and pharmacological pathways with severe safety risks, leading to candidate or target program termination, as well as highlighting that some pathways with theoretical safety concerns are amenable to safe modulation by mAbs. NHP studies have also informed the rational design of safer drug candidates suitable for human testing and informed human clinical trial design (route, dose and regimen, patient inclusion and exclusion criteria and safety monitoring), further protecting the safety of clinical trial participants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19420862.2017.1389364

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-human primates are frequently the sole species with pharmacological relevance, raising ethical and economic concerns.

    “Non-human primates are often the only pharmacologically relevant species, whose use has ethical and economic implications7.”

    From Human disease models in drug development (2023) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Discussion (page not specified) says that, for many monoclonal antibodies, non-human primates are the only pharmacologically relevant species. The Introduction calls for ethically justified use and reduced NHP use, but the passages do not address economic implications. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development. Biotech products in Big Pharma clinical pipelines have grown dramatically. Tufts CSDD Impact Reports. 2013;Vol. 15 No. 6.
  2. Ryan PC, Hammond SA, Ren S, Lutterbuese P, Amann M, Oberst MD, Mulgrew K, Criste R, Fuhrmann S, Lee N, et al. In vitro MABEL Approach for Nonclinical Safety Assessment of MEDI-565 (MT111). Published Proceedings from 8th World Congress on Alternatives and Animal Research; 2012, ALTEX publisher, August 21-25, 2011, Mon- treal, Canada.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brennan, F. R., Cavagnaro, J., McKeever, K., Ryan, P. C., Schutten, M. M., Vahle, J., Weinbauer, G. F., Marrer-Berger, E., & Black, L. E.
Affiliations
  • UCB Pharma (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Access Bio, Boyce, Verginia, United States
  • Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical (United States) (US)
  • Toxicology, Medimmune LLC, One Medimmune Way, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
  • Genentech (US)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • Covance (Germany) (DE)
  • Novartis Pharma, Preclinical Safety, F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Grenzacherstrasse 124, Basel, Basel-Stadt, Switzerland CH-4070
  • Charles River Laboratories (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Brennan, Frank R.
Venue
mAbs
Published
2017-10-26
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
1-17
ISSN
  • 1942-0862 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-0870
OpenAlex
W2762769547
Cited by
70
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • mAbs (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
Keywords
monoclonal antibodies, non-human primates, preclinical safety, human risk assessment, drug safety, pharmacological activity, novel scaffolds, clinical trial design, adverse events, translational toxicology
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Consumer Product Safety, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Humans, Primates, Risk Factors, Species Specificity, Risk Assessment, Models, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review