Cited by 42Protein purification and stabilityMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchBiosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods

Structure-based charge calculations for predicting isoelectric point, viscosity, clearance, and profiling antibody therapeutics

Open access
Thorsteinson, Nels, Gunn, John R., Kelly, Kenneth, Long, Will, Labute, Paul·2021·mAbs

Abstract

The effect of hydrophobicity on antibody aggregation is well understood, and it has been shown that charge calculations can be useful for high-concentration viscosity and pharmacokinetic (PK) clearance predictions. In this work, structure-based charge descriptors are evaluated for their predictive performance on recently published antibody pI, viscosity, and clearance data. From this, we devised four rules for therapeutic antibody profiling which address developability issues arising from hydrophobicity and charged-based solution behavior, PK, and the ability to enrich for those that are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Differences in strategy for optimizing the solution behavior of human IgG1 antibodies versus the IgG2 and IgG4 isotypes and the impact of pH alterations in formulation are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19420862.2021.1981805

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thorsteinson, N., Gunn, J. R., Kelly, K., Long, W., & Labute, P.
Affiliations
Research and Development, Chemical Computing Group ULC, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Corresponding author
Thorsteinson, Nels
Venue
mAbs
Published
2021-01-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
1981805-1981805
ISSN
  • 1942-0862 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-0870
OpenAlex
W3206994980
Cited by
42
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • mAbs (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
no funding
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Keywords
therapeutic antibodies, viscosity prediction, hydrophobicity, antibody aggregation, developability, IgG1, IgG2, IgG4
MeSH terms
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Isoelectric Point, Viscosity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review