The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Machine learning prediction of antibody aggregation and viscosity for high concentration formulation development of protein therapeutics
Open accessAbstract
Machine learning has been recently used to predict therapeutic antibody aggregation rates and viscosity at high concentrations (150 mg/ml). These works focused on commercially available antibodies, which may have been optimized for stability. In this study, we measured accelerated aggregation rates at 45°C and viscosity at 150 mg/ml for 20 preclinical and clinical-stage antibodies. Features obtained from molecular dynamics simulations of the full-length antibody and sequences were used for machine learning model construction. We found a k-nearest neighbors regression model with two features, spatial positive charge map on the CDRH2 and solvent-accessible surface area of hydrophobic residues on the variable fragment, gives the best performance for predicting antibody aggregation rates (r = 0.89). For the viscosity classification model, the model with the highest accuracy is a logistic regression model with two features, spatial negative charge map on the heavy chain variable region and spatial negative charge map on the light chain variable region. The accuracy and the area under precision recall curve of the classification model from validation tests are 0.86 and 0.70, respectively. In addition, we combined data from another 27 commercial mAbs to develop a viscosity predictive model. The best model is a logistic regression model with two features, number of hydrophobic residues on the light chain variable region and net charges on the light chain variable region. The accuracy and the area under precision recall curve of the classification model are 0.85 and 0.6, respectively. The aggregation rates and viscosity models can be used to predict antibody stability to facilitate pharmaceutical development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures




Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, there are some ML models that predict aggregation propensity using antibody sequences or structures [27,28].”
From Computational and artificial intelligence-based methods for antibody development (2023) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Müller, A., Nothman, J., Louppe, G., et al. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1201.0490 · Cited by 71,016
VMD: visual molecular dynamics
Humphrey, W., Dalke, A., & Schulten, K. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Graphics · doi:10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 · Cited by 66,952
Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water
Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J., Impey, R., & Klein, M. (1983) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.445869 · Cited by 38,397
A smooth particle mesh Ewald method
Essmann, U., Perera, L., Berkowitz, M., Darden, T., Lee, H.-C., & Pedersen, L. (1995) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.470117 · Cited by 21,378
Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD
Phillips, J. C., Braun, R., Wang, W., Gumbart, J., Tajkhorshid, E., Villa, E., Chipot, C., Skeel, R. D., Kalé, L., & Schulten, K. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20289 · Cited by 16,914
CHARMM36m: an improved force field for folded and intrinsically disordered proteins
Huang, J., Rauscher, S., Nawrocki, G., Ran, T., Feig, M., de Groot, B. L., Grubmüller, H., & MacKerell, A. D. (2016) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4067 · Cited by 7,334
PROPKA3: Consistent Treatment of Internal and Surface Residues in Empirical p K a Predictions
Olsson, M. H. M., Søndergaard, C. R., Rostkowski, M., & Jensen, J. H. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct100578z · Cited by 4,425
Update of the CHARMM all-atom additive force field for lipids: Validation on six lipid types
Klauda, J. B., Venable, R., Freites, J. A., O'Connor, J. W., Tobias, D., Mondragon-Ramirez, C., Vorobyov, I., MacKerell, A. D., & Pastor, R. (2010) · Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp101759q · Cited by 4,369
Protein aggregation and its inhibition in biopharmaceutics
Wang, W. (2005) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.11.014 · Cited by 1,023
Anatomy of the antibody molecule
PADLAN, E. A. (1994) · Molecular Immunology · doi:10.1016/0161-5890(94)90001-9 · Cited by 915
Raschka, S. (2018) · Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.00638 · Cited by 649
Design of therapeutic proteins with enhanced stability
Chennamsetty, N., Voynov, V., Kayser, V., Helk, B., & Trout, B. L. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0904191106 · Cited by 605
The CamSol method of rational design of protein mutants with enhanced solubility
Sormanni, P., Aprile, F. A., & Vendruscolo, M. (2015) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2014.09.026 · Cited by 494
Therapeutic protein aggregation: mechanisms, design, and control
Roberts, C. J. (2014) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.05.005 · Cited by 455
Liu, J., Nguyen, M. D. H., Andya, J. D., & Shire, S. J. (2005) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.20347 · Cited by 438
Structure, heterogeneity and developability assessment of therapeutic antibodies
Xu, Y., Wang, D., Mason, B. D., Rossomando, T., Li, N., Liu, D., Cheung, J. K., Xu, W., Raghava, S., Katiyar, A., et al. (2018) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2018.1553476 · Cited by 283
Modeling and docking of antibody structures with Rosetta
Weitzner, B. D., Jeliazkov, J. R., Lyskov, S., Marze, N. A., Kuroda, D., Frick, R., Adolf‐Bryfogle, J., Biswas, N., Dunbrack, R. L., & Gray, J. J. (2017) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2016.180 · Cited by 266
Sharma, V. K., Patapoff, T. W., Kabakoff, B., Pai, S., Hilario, E., Zhang, B., Li, C., Borisov, O., Kelley, R. F., Chorny, I., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1421779112 · Cited by 256
Developability Assessment During the Selection of Novel Therapeutic Antibodies
Jarasch, A., Koll, H., Regula, J. T., Bader, M., Papadimitriou, A., & Kettenberger, H. (2015) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.24430 · Cited by 242
Boehm, M. K., Woof, J. M., Kerr, M. A., & Perkins, S. J. (1999) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1998.2556 · Cited by 232
Tomar, D. S., Kumar, S., Singh, S. K., Goswami, S., & Li, L. (2016) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2015.1128606 · Cited by 215
Prediction of aggregation rate and aggregation‐prone segments in polypeptide sequences
Tartaglia, G. G., Cavalli, A., Pellarin, R., & Caflisch, A. (2005) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.051471205 · Cited by 211
Developability Index: A Rapid In Silico Tool for the Screening of Antibody Aggregation Propensity
Lauer, T. M., Agrawal, N. J., Chennamsetty, N., Egodage, K. L., Helk, B., & Trout, B. L. (2011) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.22758 · Cited by 206
Sivasubramanian, A., Sircar, A., Chaudhury, S., & Gray, J. J. (2008) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.22309 · Cited by 185
Aggrescan3D (A3D) 2.0: prediction and engineering of protein solubility
Kuriata, A., Iglesias, V., Pujols, J., Kurcinski, M., Kmiecik, S., & Ventura, S. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Res. · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz321 · Cited by 172
A single molecular descriptor to predict solution behavior of therapeutic antibodies
Kingsbury, J. S., Saini, A., Auclair, S. M., Fu, L., Lantz, M. M., Halloran, K. T., Calero‐Rubio, C., Schwenger, W. J., Airiau, C. Y., Zhang, J., et al. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb0372 · Cited by 158
Computational tool for the early screening of monoclonal antibodies for their viscosities
Agrawal, N. J., Helk, B., Kumar, S., Mody, N., Sathish, H. A., Samra, H. S., Buck, P. M., Li, L., & Trout, B. L. (2015) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2015.1099773 · Cited by 132
Leblanc, Y., Ramon, C., Bihoreau, N., & Chevreux, G. (2017) · Journal of Chromatography B · doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2017.02.017 · Cited by 127
Chemical and physical instabilities in manufacturing and storage of therapeutic proteins
Krause, M. E., & Şahin, E. (2019) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2019.01.014 · Cited by 118
Kuzman, D., Bunc, M., Ravnik, M., Reiter, F., Žagar, L., & Bončina, M. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-99875-9 · Cited by 98
Weitzner, B. D., Kuroda, D., Marze, N. A., Xu, J., & Gray, J. J. (2014) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24534 · Cited by 94
Whitaker, N., Xiong, J., Pace, S. E., Kumar, V., Middaugh, C. R., Joshi, S. B., & Volkin, D. B. (2017) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2017.06.017 · Cited by 93
Brandt, J. P., Patapoff, T. W., & Aragón, S. R. (2010) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2010.05.003 · Cited by 92
In-silico prediction of concentration-dependent viscosity curves for monoclonal antibody solutions
Tomar, D. S., Li, L., Broulidakis, M. P., Luksha, N., Burns, C. T., Singh, S. K., & Kumar, S. (2017) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2017.1285479 · Cited by 91
Brummitt, R. K., Nesta, D. P., & Roberts, C. J. (2011) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.22633 · Cited by 82
Lai, P., Fernando, A., Cloutier, T. K., Gokarn, Y. R., Zhang, J., Schwenger, W. J., Chari, R. V. J., Calero‐Rubio, C., & Trout, B. L. (2021) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c01073 · Cited by 80
Woldeyes, M. A., Qi, W., Razinkov, V., Furst, E., & Roberts, C. (2019) · Journal of Pharmacy and Science · doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2018.07.007 · Cited by 76
ANuPP: A Versatile Tool to Predict Aggregation Nucleating Regions in Peptides and Proteins
Prabakaran, R., Rawat, P., Kumar, S., & Gromiha, M. M. (2020) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2020.11.006 · Cited by 69
Makowski, E. K., Wu, L., Gupta, P., & Tessier, P. M. (2021) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2021.1895540 · Cited by 63
Engineering Stability, Viscosity, and Immunogenicity of Antibodies by Computational Design
Kuroda, D., & Tsumoto, K. (2020) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2020.01.011 · Cited by 59
Machine learning analyses of antibody somatic mutations predict immunoglobulin light chain toxicity
Garofalo, M., Piccoli, L., Romeo, M., Barzago, M. M., Ravasio, S., Foglierini, M., Matkovic, M., Sgrignani, J., Gasparo, R. D., Prunotto, M., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23880-9 · Cited by 59
Lai, P., Swan, J. W., & Trout, B. L. (2021) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2021.1907882 · Cited by 51
CPAD 2.0: a repository of curated experimental data on aggregating proteins and peptides
Rawat, P., Prabakaran, R., Sakthivel, R., Thangakani, A. M., Kumar, S., & Gromiha, M. M. (2020) · Amyloid · doi:10.1080/13506129.2020.1715363 · Cited by 46
Lai, P.-K., Fernando, A., Cloutier, T. K., Kingsbury, J. S., Gokarn, Y., Halloran, K. T., Calero-Rubio, C., & Trout, B. L. (2021) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2020.12.014 · Cited by 45
Gentiluomo, L., Roessner, D., & Frieß, W. (2020) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119039 · Cited by 40
Using simple artificial intelligence methods for predicting amyloidogenesis in antibodies
David, M. P. C., Concepción, G. P., & PADLAN, E. A. (2010) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-79 · Cited by 36
Prediction and Analysis of Antibody Amyloidogenesis from Sequences
Liaw, C., Tung, C.-W., & Ho, S. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053235 · Cited by 34
Exploring the sequence features determining amyloidosis in human antibody light chains
Rawat, P., Prabakaran, R., Kumar, S., & Gromiha, M. M. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-93019-9 · Cited by 34
Solubis: optimize your protein
Baets, G. D., Durme, J. V., van der Kant, R., Schymkowitz, J. W. H., & Rousseau, F. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv162 · Cited by 25
AbsoluRATE: An in-silico method to predict the aggregation kinetics of native proteins
Rawat, P., Prabakaran, R., Kumar, S., & Gromiha, M. M. (2021) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2021.140682 · Cited by 16
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Computational and artificial intelligence-based methods for antibody development
Kim, J., McFee, M., Fang, Q., Abdin, O., & Kim, P. M. (2023) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2022.12.005 · Cited by 178
High concentration formulation developability approaches and considerations
Zarzar, J., Khan, T. A., Bhagawati, M., Weiche, B., Sydow-Andersen, J., & Sreedhara, A. (2023) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2023.2211185 · Cited by 94
Khuat, T. T., Bassett, R., Otte, E. A., Grevis-James, A., & Gabryś, B. (2024) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108585 · Cited by 102
Blueprint for antibody biologics developability
Mieczkowski, C., Zhang, X., Lee, D., Nguyen, K., Lv, W., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Way, J., & Gries, J. (2023) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2023.2185924 · Cited by 65
Puranik, A., Dandekar, P. P., & Jain, R. D. (2022) · Biotechnology Progress · doi:10.1002/btpr.3291 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Lai, P.-K., Gallegos, A., Mody, N., Sathish, H. A., & Trout, B. L.
- Affiliations
- Stevens Institute of Technology (US)
- AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Trout, Bernhardt L.
- Venue
- mAbs
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-01-25
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2026208-2026208
- ISSN
- 1942-0862 (ISSN-L)
- 1942-0870
- PMC
- PMC8794240
- OpenAlex
- W4207044828
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6
- FWCI
- 5.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- mAbs (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Keywords
- antibody aggregation, viscosity prediction, high-concentration formulations, therapeutic proteins, monoclonal antibodies, k-nearest neighbors regression, logistic regression, hydrophobic residues, solvent accessible surface area, antibody stability, drug formulation development
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humans, Viscosity, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Protein Aggregates
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review