The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Review of mycotoxin reduction in food and feed: from prevention in the field to detoxification by adsorption or transformation
Open accessAbstract
Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites present worldwide in agricultural commodities and produced by filamentous fungi that cause a toxic response (mycotoxicosis) when ingested by animals. Prevention of mycotoxicoses includes pre- and post-harvest strategies. The best way to reduce the mycotoxin content in food and feed is the prevention of mycotoxin formation in the field, but this is often not sufficient, so other methods are needed. To decontaminate and/or detoxify mycotoxin-contaminated food and feed, the most prevalent approach in the feed industry is the inclusion of sorbent materials in the feed thus obtaining more or less selective removal of toxins by adsorption during passage through the gastrointestinal tract. Another reliable approach is to add enzymes or microorganisms capable of detoxifying some mycotoxins. Through a comprehensive review of published reports on the strategies for mycotoxin removal, this present work aims to update our understanding of mycotoxin removal. It provides an insight into the detoxification of mycotoxin present in food and feed. In the future, more emphasis needs to be placed on adsorption of mycotoxins in the gastrointestinal tract. Concerning the enzymatic transformation of mycotoxins, further efforts are required in understanding detoxification reactions, the toxicity of transformation products and in the characterization of enzymes responsible for transformations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Aflatoxin B1 and M1: Biological Properties and Their Involvement in Cancer Development
Marchese, S., Polo, A., Ariano, A., Velotto, S., Costantini, S., & Severino, L. (2018) · Toxins · doi:10.3390/toxins10060214 · Cited by 594
Silage processing and strategies to prevent persistence of undesirable microorganisms.
Dunière, L., Sindou, J., Chaucheyras-Durand, F., Chevallier, I., & Thévenot-Sergentet, D. (2013) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.04.006 · Cited by 335
Vila-Donat, P., Marín, S., Sanchis, V., & Ramos, A. J. (2018) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2018.02.044 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Jard, G., Liboz, T., Mathieu, F., Guyonvarc’h, A., & Lebrihi, A.
- Venue
- Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1590-1609
- ISSN
- 1944-0049 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-0057
- OpenAlex
- W2073510804
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of mycotoxin reduction in food and feed: from prevention in the field to detoxification by adsorption or transformation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/19440049.2011.595377
- The paper
- Jard, G., Liboz, T., Mathieu, F., Guyonvarc’h, A., & Lebrihi, A. (2011). Review of mycotoxin reduction in food and feed: from prevention in the field to detoxification by adsorption or transformation. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2011.595377
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.