Cited by 11Ginkgo biloba and Cashew ApplicationsPhytochemistry and Biological ActivitiesCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Phytocomponents and evaluation of acetylcholinesterase inhibition by Ginkgo biloba L. leaves extract depending on vegetation period

Open access
Kobus-Cisowska, Joanna, Dziedziński, Marcin, Szczepaniak, Oskar, Kusek, Weronika, Kmiecik, Dominik, Ligaj, Marta, Telichowska, Aleksandra, Byczkiewicz, Szymon +2 more·2020·CyTA - Journal of Food

Abstract

Leaves of the Ginkgo biloba L. have been identified as a source of bioactive compounds and their consumption may lead to the improvement of the brain function. During two vegetation periods, extracts of green and yellow leaves of Ginkgo biloba were analyzed for their chemical constituents and health properties. Samples were analyzed via HPLC and GC methods for the presence and content of phytochemicals. The antioxidant effect towards DPPH and ABTS radicals was studied. The antioxidant activity of samples was measured in Rancimat and Oxidograph tests along with the effectiveness of samples as inhibitors against cholinesterase. The content of individual phytochemicals was found to depend on the harvesting period and type of solvent used in the extraction process. Gingko yellow leaf extracts showed highest radical-scavenging activity as well as cholinesterase inhibition activity, and can be a valuable raw material to produce extracts possessing high cholinesterase inhibition activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19476337.2020.1804462

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kobus-Cisowska, J., Dziedziński, M., Szczepaniak, O., Kusek, W., Kmiecik, D., Ligaj, M., Telichowska, A., Byczkiewicz, S., Szulc, P., & Szwajgier, D.
Affiliations
  • Poznan University of Life Sciences
  • Poznań University of Life Sciences (PL)
  • Northern Michigan University (US)
  • Poznań University of Economics and Business (PL)
  • Foundation for Innovation and Technology Transfer (IN)
  • University of Life Sciences in Lublin (PL)
Corresponding author
Dziedziński, Marcin
Venue
CyTA - Journal of Food
Published
2020-01-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
606-615
ISSN
  • 1947-6337 (ISSN-L)
  • 1947-6345
OpenAlex
W3084138668
Cited by
11
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CyTA - Journal of Food (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science and Higher Education program as “Regional Initiative Excellence” (005/RID/2018/19)
  • statutory funds of the Department of Gastronomy Sciences and Functional Foods of Poznan University of Life Sciences (506.751.03.00)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Ginkgo biloba and Cashew Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry and Biological Activities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
Ginkgo biloba, leaf extract, acetylcholinesterase inhibition, antioxidant activity, phytochemicals, harvest time, solvent extraction, DPPH radical scavenging, ABTS radical scavenging, lipid oxidation, cognitive function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review