Cited by 162Gut microbiota and healthNutritional Studies and DietNutrition, Genetics, and Disease

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 147 of the 147 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Linking dietary patterns with gut microbial composition and function

Open access

Abstract

Emerging insights have implicated the gut microbiota as an important factor in the maintenance of human health. Although nutrition research has focused on how direct interactions between dietary components and host systems influence human health, it is becoming increasingly important to consider nutrient effects on the gut microbiome for a more complete picture. Understanding nutrient-host-microbiome interactions promises to reveal novel mechanisms of disease etiology and progression, offers new disease prevention strategies and therapeutic possibilities, and may mandate alternative criteria to evaluate the safety of food ingredients. Here we review the current literature on diet effects on the microbiome and the generation of microbial metabolites of dietary constituents that may influence human health. We conclude with a discussion of the relevance of these studies to nutrition and public health and summarize further research needs required to realize the potential of exploiting diet-microbiota interactions for improved health.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19490976.2016.1270809

Cites

147 of 147 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 147 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Camire M, 2001, Cereal Foods World, 46, 112
  2. Graf D, 2015, Microb Ecol Health Dis, 26, 26164
  3. Macfarlane G, 2008, J Appl Microbiol, 104, 305
  4. García-Peris P, 2012, Nutr Hosp, 27, 1908
  5. Waitzberg DL, 2012, Nutr Hosp, 27, 123
  6. Van de Wiele T, 2007, J ApplMicrobiol, 102, 452

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–161 of 161

Metadata

Authors
Sheflin, A. M., Melby, C. L., Carbonero, F., & Weir, T. L.
Affiliations
  • Colorado State University (US)
  • University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
Corresponding author
Weir, Tiffany L.
Venue
Gut Microbes
Published
2016-12-14
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
113-129
ISSN
  • 1949-0976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1949-0984
OpenAlex
W2561384804
Cited by
162
References
147
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 10
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gut Microbes (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Keywords
dietary habits, gut microbiota, diet-microbiome interactions, human health, disease prevention, food ingredient safety
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Animals, Diet, Feeding Behavior, Food Analysis, Humans, Gastrointestinal Tract

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review