CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 167Gut microbiota and healthSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gut microbiota profiles in critically ill patients, potential biomarkers and risk variables for sepsis

Open access
Agudelo-Ochoa, Gloria M., Valdés-Duque, Beatriz E., Giraldo-Giraldo, Nubia A., Jaillier-Ramírez, Ana M., Giraldo-Villa, Adriana, Acevedo-Castaño, Irene, Yepes-Molina, Mónica A., Barbosa-Barbosa, Janeth, Benítez-Paéz, Alfonso·2020·Gut Microbes
DOI 10.1080/19490976.2019.1707610PMC PMC7524144
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Critically ill patients are physiologically unstable and recent studies indicate that the intestinal microbiota could be involved in the health decline of such patients during ICU stays. This study aims to assess the intestinal microbiota in critically ill patients with and without sepsis and to determine its impact on outcome variables, such as medical complications, ICU stay time, and mortality. A multi-center study was conducted with a total of 250 peri-rectal swabs obtained from 155 patients upon admission and during ICU stays. Intestinal microbiota was assessed by sequencing the V3-V4 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene. Linear mixed models were used to integrate microbiota data with more than 40 clinical and demographic variables to detect covariates and minimize the effect of confounding factors. We found that the microbiota of ICU patients with sepsis has an increased abundance of microbes tightly associated with inflammation, such as Parabacteroides, Fusobacterium and Bilophila species. Female sex and aging would represent an increased risk for sepsis possibly because of some of their microbiota features. We also evidenced a remarkable loss of microbial diversity, during the ICU stay. Concomitantly, we detected that the abundance of pathogenic species, such as Enterococcus spp., was differentially increased in sepsis patients who died, indicating these species as potential biomarkers for monitoring during ICU stay. We concluded that particular intestinal microbiota signatures could predict sepsis development in ICU patients. We propose potential biomarkers for evaluation in the clinical management of ICU patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19490976.2019.1707610

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1. Microbial community structure of the study groups. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of multidimensional data is drawn to display changes in microbial communities according to major variables retrieved to shape the IM, sepsis status, sex, and age. The x- and y-axes represent the two most informative principal coordinates (PCs) of the PCoA, and marginal boxplots describe the distribution of those values for the different groups. Color legends represent the respective variables under analysis. Blue-shaded points show outliers. A pairwise Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare PC1 or PC2 values between groups, and p-values are shown beside marginal boxplots. The results of the permutation-based test (PERMANOVA) to compare dissimilarity indexes among samples are shown on top of plots accordingly.
Figure 1. Microbial community structure of the study groups. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of multidimensional data is drawn to display changes in microbial communities according to major variables retrieved to shape the IM, sepsis status, sex, and age. The x- and y-axes represent the two most informative principal coordinates (PCs) of the PCoA, and marginal boxplots describe the distribution of those values for the different groups. Color legends represent the respective variables under analysis. Blue-shaded points show outliers. A pairwise Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare PC1 or PC2 values between groups, and p-values are shown beside marginal boxplots. The results of the permutation-based test (PERMANOVA) to compare dissimilarity indexes among samples are shown on top of plots accordingly.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 2. OTUs associated with the sepsis condition. Gardner–Altman estimation plots showing the distribution of the number of rarefied DNA reads obtained for OTUs with extreme variation between groups. In all cases, the variance is reported on a log scale and is referred to as observed in the “No sepsis” group (p ≤ 0.01) and accompanied by confidence intervals (CI 95%). The color legend represents the primary variable of the study, sepsis status. SINA aligner (https://www.arb-silva.de/aligner/) with the SILVA database and a Blast-based search against the non-redundant NCBI 16S database (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?) were used as methods to disclose the taxonomy of selected OTUs. The sequence identity percentage is shown within parentheses. The distribution of unpaired mean differences between groups (based on 5000 replicates) is shown on the right of the respective Gardner–Altman plots.
Figure 2. OTUs associated with the sepsis condition. Gardner–Altman estimation plots showing the distribution of the number of rarefied DNA reads obtained for OTUs with extreme variation between groups. In all cases, the variance is reported on a log scale and is referred to as observed in the “No sepsis” group (p ≤ 0.01) and accompanied by confidence intervals (CI 95%). The color legend represents the primary variable of the study, sepsis status. SINA aligner (https://www.arb-silva.de/aligner/) with the SILVA database and a Blast-based search against the non-redundant NCBI 16S database (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?) were used as methods to disclose the taxonomy of selected OTUs. The sequence identity percentage is shown within parentheses. The distribution of unpaired mean differences between groups (based on 5000 replicates) is shown on the right of the respective Gardner–Altman plots.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 3. Alpha diversity analysis of longitudinal samples from the sepsis groups. The observed OTUs (a), Chao’s index (b), Simpson’s evenness (c), and Simpson’s reciprocal index (d) were assessed across the M1, M2.5, M2.6, and M2.7 samples. Statistical assessment was carried out with the pairwise Wilcoxon rank-sum test for unpaired samples with the post hoc Benjamini–Hochberg method for multiple testing correction, and p-values derived from respective tests are depicted on top of Gardner–Altman estimation plots accordingly (p ≤ 0.05). Distributions at the bottom of the plots show the unpaired median difference based on 5000 replicates.
Figure 3. Alpha diversity analysis of longitudinal samples from the sepsis groups. The observed OTUs (a), Chao’s index (b), Simpson’s evenness (c), and Simpson’s reciprocal index (d) were assessed across the M1, M2.5, M2.6, and M2.7 samples. Statistical assessment was carried out with the pairwise Wilcoxon rank-sum test for unpaired samples with the post hoc Benjamini–Hochberg method for multiple testing correction, and p-values derived from respective tests are depicted on top of Gardner–Altman estimation plots accordingly (p ≤ 0.05). Distributions at the bottom of the plots show the unpaired median difference based on 5000 replicates.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 4. OTUs associated with death. A – The normalized DNA read counts (log10) for OTU45 and OTU46 are depicted in a boxplot manner for sepsis samples across the time (M1 to M2.7) of stay in the ICU. The color legend discriminates the samples from patients with ICU discharge as “alive” and “dead”. Blue-shaded points indicate outliers. B – A logistic regression with data regarding OTUs potentially related to death of ICU patients with sepsis, based on their abundance changes across the ICU stay. Abundance changes were calculated as log[average(M2 samples)] – log[M1 samples]. The OTU information and the associated taxonomy as well as main parameters retrieved after logistic regression, such as the odds ratio (OR), Akaike information criterion (AIC), and p-values, are shown inside the plot.
Figure 4. OTUs associated with death. A – The normalized DNA read counts (log10) for OTU45 and OTU46 are depicted in a boxplot manner for sepsis samples across the time (M1 to M2.7) of stay in the ICU. The color legend discriminates the samples from patients with ICU discharge as “alive” and “dead”. Blue-shaded points indicate outliers. B – A logistic regression with data regarding OTUs potentially related to death of ICU patients with sepsis, based on their abundance changes across the ICU stay. Abundance changes were calculated as log[average(M2 samples)] – log[M1 samples]. The OTU information and the associated taxonomy as well as main parameters retrieved after logistic regression, such as the odds ratio (OR), Akaike information criterion (AIC), and p-values, are shown inside the plot.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Konturek PC, 2015, J Physiol Pharmacol, 66, 483
  2. de la Cuesta-zuluaga J, 2019, mSystems, 4:e00261–19
  3. 10.1002/jpen.v43.7 · DOI
  4. Hooks KB, O’Malley MA, 2017, MBio, 8, e01492
  5. McDonald D, 2016, mSphere, 1:e00199–16

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Agudelo-Ochoa, G. M., Valdés-Duque, B. E., Giraldo-Giraldo, N. A., Jaillier-Ramírez, A. M., Giraldo-Villa, A., Acevedo-Castaño, I., Yepes-Molina, M. A., Barbosa-Barbosa, J., & Benítez-Paéz, A.
Affiliations
  • Food and Human Nutrition Research Group, Universidad de Antioquia (UdeA), Medellín, Colombia
  • Institución Universitaria Colegio Mayor de Antioquia (CO)
  • Hospital Universitario de San Vicente Fundación (CO)
  • Department of Nutrition, Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe, Medellín, Colombia
  • Department of Nutrition, Hospital General, Medellín, Colombia
  • Department of Nutrition, Clínica Las Américas, Medellín, Colombia
  • Microbial Ecology, Nutrition and Health Research Unit, Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology. Spanish National Research Council (IATA-CSIC), Paterna-Valencia, Spain
ORCID
Venue
Gut Microbes
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2020-01-10
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
1707610
ISSN
  • 1949-0976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1949-0984
DOI
10.1080/19490976.2019.1707610
PMC
PMC7524144
OpenAlex
W3000570416
Cited by
166
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 3
FWCI
7.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Gut Microbes (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository University of Antioquia (University of Antioquia) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Universidad de Antioquia (N/A)
  • Instituto de Nutrición y Salud Kellogg´s (N/A)
  • Institución Universitaria Colegio Mayor de Antioquia (N/A)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Keywords
gut microbiota, sepsis, critically ill patients, intensive care unit, sepsis biomarkers, microbial diversity, Enterococcus, Parabacteroides, Fusobacterium, Bilophila, sex differences, aging, mortality, inflammation, risk factors
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Adult, Bacteria, Critical Care, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Intestines, Male, Middle Aged, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Biomarkers, Case-Control Studies, Critical Illness, Sepsis, APACHE, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review