Cited by 16Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchEthics in medical practiceEthics in Business and Education

Moral injury prevention and intervention

Open access
Williamson, Victoria, Kothari, Radha, Bonson, Amanda, Campbell, Gavin, Greenberg, Neil, Murphy, Dominic, Lamb, Danielle·2025·European Journal of Psychotraumatology

Abstract

Background: Those working in high-risk occupations may often face ethical dilemmas that violate their moral code which can lead to moral injury (MI). While research into the impact of MI is growing, evidence for effective treatment interventions and prevention approaches remains limited.Objective: To review recent developments in treatment and prevention approaches for MI-related mental health difficulties.Method: We synthesised emerging treatments, including trauma focused therapies and spiritual approaches, as well as possible prevention strategies.Results: Conventional treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (e.g. prolonged exposure) often inadequately address MI and may exacerbate symptoms. Adapted or novel approaches, including Impact of Killing, Adaptive Disclosure, and Restore and Rebuild, show promise, particularly when co-produced with patients and clinicians. Spiritual interventions demonstrate mixed outcomes. Prevention research remains very limited but highlights the potential of systemic reforms, leadership fostering psychological safety, preparedness training, structured reflection, and peer support. Evidence remains constrained by small samples, military-focused populations, and inconsistent measurement of MI.Conclusions: While no gold-standard intervention exists, values-based and compassion-focused approaches appear promising. Prevention strategies targeting organisational culture and fostering preparedness are urgently needed, particularly for civilian and diverse occupational groups, to better support and protect those exposed to potentially morally injurious events.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/20008066.2025.2567721

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current treatment models seek to restore moral and relational functioning, rebuild trust and belonging, cultivate restorative moral and social experiences, and foster acceptance, forgiveness, self-reorientation, and renewed engagement with moral communities.

    “Current treatment models therefore seek to restore moral and relational functioning, rebuild trust and belonging, cultivate restorative moral and social experiences, and foster acceptance, forgiveness, self-reorientation, and renewed engagement with moral communities (13, 53, 54)—core therapeutic aims that require broadened awareness and reduced self-focus.”

    From The therapeutic role of self-transcendence in moral injury recovery: theory, mechanisms, and clinical implications (2026) · cites this paper as [54]

    The treatment section and Table 1 (page unavailable) describe interventions aimed at repairing social bonds, strengthening connections, reconnecting with values, and fostering acceptance and forgiveness. They do not clearly identify rebuilding trust and belonging or renewed engagement with moral communities as treatment aims; the discussion of trust appears in a separate prevention section. The citing authors’ statement about broadened awareness and reduced self-focus follows the citations and is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Emerging theories on moral injury treatment frame moral injury as a multidimensional phenomenon encompassing interlocking self-focus, relational, and meaning-making processes.

    “Consistent with these views, emerging theories on MI treatment increasingly frame moral injury as a multidimensional phenomenon—encompassing interlocking self-focus, relational, and meaning-making processes—and have informed the development of interventions that prioritize identity-level disruptions and maladaptive meaning-making over symptom reduction alone (13, 53, 54).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Agazio, J., & Padden, D. L. (2024). “Doing the right thing”: moral conflicts and ethical issues experienced by military nurses during wartime. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 56, 854– 866. doi: 10.1111/JNU.13011;WEBSITE:WEBSITE:SIGMAPUBS;PAGE:STRING:ARTICLE/CHAPTER 39177236 · DOI
  2. Aita, S. L., Kondrath, S. R., Owen, T., Borgogna, N. C., & Usset, T. J. (2023). The status of evidence-based treatments for moral injury syndrome: Review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry, 10(3), 217– 233. doi: 10.1007/S40501-023-00292-8/METRICS · DOI
  3. Canning, C., Szusecki, T., Hilton, N. Z., et al. (2025). Psychological health and safety of criminal justice workers: A scoping review of strategies and supporting research. Health & Justice, 13, 1– 21. doi: 10.1186/S40352-025-00320-0/TABLES/2 40009299 PMC11863410 · DOI
  4. Dennard, S., Tracy, D. K., Beeney, A., et al. (2021a). Working in a prison: Challenges, rewards, and the impact on mental health and well-being. Journal of Forensic Practice, 23, 132– 149. doi: 10.1108/JFP-12-2020-0055/FULL/XML · DOI
  5. Dennard, S., Tracy, D. K., Beeney, A., et al. (2021b). Working in a prison: Challenges, rewards, and the impact on mental health and well-being. Journal of Forensic Practice, 23, 132– 149. doi: 10.1108/JFP-12-2020-0055/FULL/XML · DOI
  6. Griffin, B. J., Maguen, S., McCue, M. L., et al. (2025). Moral injury is independently associated with suicidal ideation and suicide attempt in high-stress, service-oriented occupations. npj Mental Health Research, 4, 1– 7. doi: 10.1038/S44184-025-00151-9;SUBJMETA=1537,477,631,692;KWRD=HEALTH+OCCUPATIONS,PSYCHOLOGY 40751003 PMC12317004 · DOI
  7. Griffin, B. J., Weber, M. C., Hinkson, K. D., et al. (2023). Toward a dimensional contextual model of moral injury: A scoping review on healthcare workers. Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry, 10, 199– 216. doi: 10.1007/S40501-023-00296-4/FIGURES/3 · DOI
  8. Harris, J. I., Chamberlin, E. S., Engdahl, B., et al. (2021). Spiritually integrated interventions for PTSD and moral injury: A review. Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry, 8, 196– 212. doi: 10.1007/S40501-021-00248-W/METRICS · DOI
  9. Harris, J. I., Usset, T., Voecks, C., et al. (2018). Spiritually integrated care for PTSD: A randomized controlled trial of “building spiritual strength”. Psychiatry Research, 267, 420– 428. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.06.045 29980120 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Srivastava, S., Khan, M., Kumari, A., et al. (2024). A study of workplace bullying and coping strategies in hospitality sector: Role of moral injury and inclusive leadership. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness, 11, 18– 34. doi: 10.1108/JOEPP-03-2023-0069/FULL/XML · DOI
  11. Stanojević, S., & Čartolovni, A. (2022). Moral distress and moral injury and their interplay as a challenge for leadership and management: The case of Croatia. Journal of Nursing Management, 30, 2335– 2345. doi: 10.1111/JONM.13835;PAGE:STRING:ARTICLE/CHAPTER 36194206 · DOI
  12. Starnino, V. R., Angel, C. T., Sullivan, J. E., et al. (2019). Preliminary report on a spiritually-based PTSD intervention for military veterans. Community Mental Health Journal, 55, 1114– 1119. doi: 10.1007/S10597-019-00414-8/METRICS 31119448 · DOI
  13. Starnino, V. R., Sullivan, W. P., Angel, C. T., et al. (2019). Moral injury, coherence, and spiritual repair. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 22, 99– 114. doi: 10.1080/13674676.2019.1589439;PAGE:STRING:ARTICLE/CHAPTER · DOI
  14. Varker, T., Metcalf, O., Watson, L., et al. (2022). The current status of moral injury: A narrative review and Rapid Evidence Assessment The current status of moral injury: A narrative review and Rapid Evidence Assessment ii Acknowledgements The current status of moral injury: A narrative review and Rapid Evidence Assessment iii. Published Online First.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williamson, V., Kothari, R., Bonson, A., Campbell, G., Greenberg, N., Murphy, D., & Lamb, D.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Combat Stress
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB)
Corresponding author
Williamson, Victoria
Venue
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Published
2025-10-21
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
2567721-2567721
ISSN
2000-8066 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4415400132
Cited by
16
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 16
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Psychotraumatology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Forces in Mind Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
Keywords
moral injury, high-risk occupations, military personnel, post-traumatic stress disorder, trauma-focused psychotherapy, spiritual intervention, compassion-focused therapy, values-based intervention, psychological safety, peer support, organizational culture, co-production
MeSH terms
Humans, Morals, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review