Cited by 57Migration, Health and TraumaPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in war-traumatized refugee and internally displaced minors: systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Nocon, Agnes, Eberle-Sejari, Rima, Unterhitzenberger, Johanna, Rosner, Rita·2017·European Journal of Psychotraumatology

Abstract

Background: The United Nations reported that in 2016 over 65 million people worldwide have forcibly left home. Over 50% are children and adolescents; a substantial number has been traumatized and displaced by war.Objective: To provide an overview of the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in this group we conducted a narrative review and a meta-analysis of intervention studies providing data on posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS), depression, anxiety, grief, and general distress.Method: We searched PILOTS, MEDLINE, WoS, Embase, CENTRAL, LILACS, PsycINFO, ASSIA, CSA, and SA for studies on treatment outcomes for war-traumatized displaced children and adolescents. Between-group effect sizes (ES) and pre-post ES were reconstructed for each trial. Overall pre-post ES were calculated using a random effects model.Results: The narrative review covers 23 studies with a variety of treatments. Out of the 35 calculated between-group ES, only six were significant, all compared to untreated controls. Two of them indicated significant adverse effects on symptoms of general distress or depression. When calculating pre-post effect sizes, the positive between-group results of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and interpersonal therapy (IPT) were reproduced and singular other treatments showed significant positive effects. However, the mean pre-post effects for PTSS and depression could not be interpreted due to the high heterogeneity of the included studies (PTSS: ES = 0.78; I2 = 88.6%; depression: ES = 0.35; I2 = 93.1%). Only the mean pre-post effect for seven active CBT treatment groups for depression (ES = 0.30, 95% CI [0.18, 0.43]) was interpretable (Q = 3.3, df = 6, p = .77).Conclusion: Given the large number of children and adolescents displaced by war there were regrettably few treatment studies available, and many of them were of low methodological quality. The effect sizes lagged behind the effects observed in traumatized minors in general, and often were small or non-significant. However, CBT and IPT showed promising results that need further replication.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/20008198.2017.1388709

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Išpanović-Radojković V., Petrović V., Davis H., Tenjović L., & Minčić T. (2002). Evaluation of psychosocial intervention with traumatised adolescents In Powell S. & Durakovic-Belko E. (Eds.), The psychosocial consequences of war: Results of empirical research from the territory of former Yugoslavia (pp. 268– 271). Sarajevo, Bosnia-Herzegovina: D O O OTISAK.
  2. Šehović M. (2002). Evaluation of results of cognitive-behavioural therapy with traumatised children of displaced persons In Powell S., Durakovic-Belko E., Powell S., & Durakovic-Belko E. (Eds.), The psychosocial consequences of war: Results of empirical research from the territory of former Yugoslavia (pp. 265– 266). Sarajevo, Bosnia-Herzegovina: D O O OTISAK.
  3. Šestan D. (2002). Participation in a program of psychosocial support and reduction of posttraumatic symptoms in pre-school children and their mothers In Powell S., Durakovic-Belko E., Powell S., & Durakovic-Belko E. (Eds.), The psychosocial consequences of war: Results of empirical research from the territory of former Yugoslavia (pp. 255– 257). Sarajevo, Bosnia-Herzegovina: D O O OTISAK.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nocon, A., Eberle-Sejari, R., Unterhitzenberger, J., & Rosner, R.
Affiliations
Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt (DE)
Corresponding author
Nocon, Agnes
Venue
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Published
2017-11-07
Volume
8
Issue
sup2
Pages
1388709-1388709
ISSN
2000-8066 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2767667061
Cited by
57
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Psychotraumatology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
psychosocial interventions, war trauma, refugee children, internally displaced children, adolescents, posttraumatic stress symptoms, depression, anxiety, grief, general distress, cognitive behavioral therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, treatment effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review