Cited by 20Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchDisaster Management and ResilienceResilience and Mental Health

Piloting a Scalable, Post-Trauma Psychosocial Intervention in Tuvalu: The Skills for Life Adjustment and Resilience (SOLAR) Program

Open access
Gibson, Kari, Little, Jonathon, Cowlishaw, Sean, Ipitoa Toromon, Teawa, Forbes, David, O’Donnell, Meaghan·2021·European Journal of Psychotraumatology

Abstract

Background: The Skills for Life Adjustment and Resilience (SOLAR) programme is a brief, scalable, psychosocial skill-building programme designed to reduce distress and adjustment difficulties following disaster.Objectives: We tested the feasibility, acceptability, efficacy and safety of a culturally adapted version of SOLAR in two remote, cyclone-affected communities in the Pacific Island nation of Tuvalu.Method: This pilot adopted a quasi-experimental, control design involving 99 participants. SOLAR was administered to the treatment group (n = 49) by local, non-specialist facilitators (i.e. ‘Coaches’) in a massed, group format across 5 consecutive days. The control group (n = 50) had access to Usual Care (UC). We compared group differences (post-intervention vs. post-control) with psychological distress being the primary outcome. We also examined whether changes were maintained at 6-month follow-up.Results: Large, statistically significant group differences in psychological distress were observed after controlling for baseline scores in favour of the SOLAR group. Mean group outcomes were consistently lower at 6-month follow-up than at baseline. SOLAR was found to be acceptable and safe, and programme feedback from participants and Coaches was overwhelmingly positive.Conclusions: Findings contribute to emerging evidence that SOLAR is a flexible, culturally adaptable and scalable intervention that can support individual recovery and adjustment in the aftermath of disaster. RCTs to strengthen evidence of SOLAR’s efficacy are warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/20008198.2021.1948253

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Forbes, D., O’Donnell, M. L., & Bryant, R. A. (2017). Psychosocial recovery following community disasters: An international collaboration. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 51(7), 660– 662. doi: 10.1177/0004867416679737 27872330 · DOI
  2. Gibson, K. E., Barnett, J., Haslam, N., & Kaplan, I. (2020b). The mental health impacts of climate change: Findings from a Pacific Island atoll nation. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 73, 102237. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102237 32485590 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Mollica, R. F., McDonald, L. S., Massagli, M. P., & Silove, D. M. (2004). Measuring trauma, measuring torture: Instructions and guidance on the utilization of the Harvard Program in Refugee Trauma’s versions of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 (HSCL-25) & the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire (HTQ). Cambridge: Havard Program in Refugee Trauma.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gibson, K., Little, J., Cowlishaw, S., Ipitoa Toromon, T., Forbes, D., & O’Donnell, M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Phoenix Australia Centre for Posttraumatic Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
Corresponding author
Gibson, Kari
Venue
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Published
2021-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
1948253-1948253
ISSN
2000-8066 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3188717257
Cited by
20
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Psychotraumatology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
psychological distress, Tuvalu, culturally tailored interventions, scalable interventions, group intervention, feasibility and acceptability
MeSH terms
Psychological Distress, Psychosocial Intervention, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Micronesia, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Wounds and Injuries, Resilience, Psychological, Cyclonic Storms, Disaster Victims, Culturally Competent Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review