The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring the front-end of project management
Abstract
This paper is a multi-case study exploratory investigation into the earliest stages of projects and their management.We refer to this throughout the paper as the 'front-end'.We provide a definition of this phase of the project life cycle and conduct a literature review of the various topics that would suggest themselves to be apposite to the front-end.This includes governance and strategy; requirements and technology; estimating; risk and value; people and learning and development.Following this review of literature, we set out the approach taken in the empirical study.The context for the study was the UK, although many of the organizations investigated had a global presence and some of their projects were multinational in nature.We detail the research methods, the multi-case study route taken and the nature of the in-depth interviews with senior project management representatives from nine extremely credible organizations experienced in managing projects.Our findings are presented so as to identify the key set of findings determined after multiple passes of the interview details.These findings reflect both what comprises the front-end of projects and what management does in the front-end.Some of this would be expected of project management, but we found aspects of the front-end management that are not within the normal remit of what is considered to be traditional project management.These findings both reinforce the literature and offer new insights, for example, showing the strong influence of the commercial and economic non-project players in leading or influencing the front-end of projects.A considered set of conclusions are presented together with recommendations for further research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Not only is there a significant opportunity to create value for the project in the front end, but also risks as uncertainty is high, see, e.g., Edkins et al. (2013).”
From Rethinking the project life cycle – how circularity challenges processes, roles and governance (2025) · cites this paper as Edkins et al. (2013)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24160888 · Cited by 16,670
Hartley, J. (2004) · Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research · doi:10.4135/9781446280119.n26 · Cited by 15,461
Building theories from case study research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (2009) · STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI · doi:10.3280/so2008-002004 · Cited by 11,299
Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1994) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198288787.001.0001 · Cited by 7,370
Męcfal, S. (2012) · University of Lodz Repository (University of Łódź) · Cited by 6,617
A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide)
Pmbok (2004) · Cited by 4,316
Open innovation : researching a new paradigm
Chesbrough, H. W., Vanhaverbeke, W. P. M., & West, J. (2006) · Cited by 3,335
Bion, W. R., & Hinshelwood, R. (2023) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003411840 · Cited by 3,063
Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm
(2006) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199290727.001.0001 · Cited by 2,689
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Kirkpatrick D., 2009, Royal United Services Institute Journal Defence Systems, Summer, 102
- Ministry of Technology, 1966, Report of the Steering Group on Development Cost Estimating
- Morris P. W.G., 2011, Project Perspectives, 33, 4
- Office of Government Commerce (OGC), 2007, Review 4: Readiness for Service, OGC Gateway Process
- Project Management Institute (PMI), 2013, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)
Cited by
The front-end of projects: a systematic literature review and structuring
Williams, T., Vo, H., Samset, K., & Edkins, A. (2019) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2019.1594429 · Cited by 145
Self-citationRethinking the project life cycle – how circularity challenges processes, roles and governance
Lingegård, S., & Hedborg, S. (2025) · Project Leadership and Society · doi:10.1016/j.plas.2025.100194 · Cited by 10
Denicol, J. (2022) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.01.004 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Edkins, A., Geraldi, J., Morris, P., & Smith, A.
- Venue
- Engineering Project Organization Journal
- Published
- 2013-04-03
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 71-85
- ISSN
- 2157-3727
- 2157-3735
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 62
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.