Cited by 43Obesity and Health PracticesEating Disorders and BehaviorsGender, Feminism, and Media

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fitspo at Every Size? A comparative content analysis of #curvyfit versus #curvyyoga Instagram images

Abstract

Contemporary fat studies scholarship seeks to challenge and critique the normative weightist lens through which modern social media for example stereotypically represent the embodiment of higher-weight individuals or the typical underrepresentation of body diversity in the cases of mainstream Fitspiration and yoga lifestyle media. Simultaneously, proponents of the fat acceptance/body positivity movement are currently at odds over the increasingly expansive appropriation of the term curvy for self-identification. In light of these tensions, utilizing body conceptualization theory as a guiding framework, we examined the shared and distinct approaches used to exemplify and motivate fitness and health as reflected in 300 images sourced from #curvyfit and #curvyyoga on Instagram. Images were systematically coded for sociodemographic (e.g., race/ethnicity, gender), body-as-process (e.g., physically active portrayals), and body-as-object (e.g., weight loss, body modification) attributes. Results revealed that #curvyfit images featured a greater representation of physical appearance–oriented aspects of fitness; #curvyyoga images more often conveyed larger body sizes, shapes, and body-as-process characteristics. Preliminary findings have important implications for counteracting weight-biased perceptions equating thinness with physical fitness and promoting yoga as an important health practice among individuals with a range of body sizes. Our initial stage findings also raise areas of future critical inquiry surrounding the complex messaging at the intersection of fat embodiment, curvy identification, and healthism that are particularly ripe for subsequent qualitative investigation with actual digital media users.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21604851.2019.1548860

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prevalent portrayal of a 'yoga body' in mainstream publications is that of a white, slim woman (Webb et al. 2017a; Webb et al. 2017b; Webb et al. 2019).

    “The prevalent portrayal of a 'yoga body' in mainstream publications is that of a white, slim woman (Webb etal. 2017a; Webb etal. 2017b; Webb etal. 2019).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 10.1037/0022-1067.53.4.486 · DOI
  2. DePatie J., 2015, The Politics of Size: Perspectives from the Fat Acceptance Movement Volume 2, 75
  3. Good Men Project Editors, 2017, “Are “Curvy Men” All the Rage Too? (Call for submissions).”
  4. Klein M. C., 2018, Yoga Rising: 30 Empowering Stories from Yoga Renegades for Every Body
  5. Meadows A., 2015, The Politics of Size: Perspectives from the Fat Acceptance Movement Volume 2
  6. Reid R., 2017, “Felicity Hayward Explains Why It’s Okay for ‘Plus-Size’ Women to Call Themselves ‘Curvy’.”
  7. Stanger M., 2017, “The “Good Fatty, Bad Fatty” Stereotype Is Sabotaging Body Positivity.”
  8. Stanley J., 2018, Yoga Rising: 30 Empowering Stories from Yoga Renegades for Every Body, 145
  9. Tonic G., 2015, “Why We Need to Eliminate “Curvy” from the Plus Size Vocabulary.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Webb, J. B., Thomas, E. V., Rogers, C. B., Clark, V. N., Hartsell, E. N., & Putz, D. Y.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
Corresponding author
Webb, Jennifer B.
Venue
Fat Studies
Published
2018-12-11
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
154-172
ISSN
  • 2160-4851 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-486X
OpenAlex
W2904112172
Cited by
43
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2
FWCI
8.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Fat Studies (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
Keywords
Instagram, body image, body diversity, fat acceptance, body positivity, healthism, yoga, body modification, weight loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review