Cited by 278Eating Disorders and BehaviorsGender, Feminism, and MediaBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

“Fitspiration” on social media: a content analysis of gendered images

Open access
Carrotte, Elise Rose, Prichard, Ivanka, Lim, Megan Su Cheng·2017·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: "Fitspiration" (also known as "fitspo") aims to inspire individuals to exercise and be healthy, but emerging research indicates exposure can negatively impact female body image. Fitspiration is frequently accessed on social media; however, it is currently unclear the degree to which messages about body image and exercise differ by gender of the subject. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to conduct a content analysis to identify the characteristics of fitspiration content posted across social media and whether this differs according to subject gender. METHODS: Content tagged with #fitspo across Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, and Tumblr was extracted over a composite 30-minute period. All posts were analyzed by 2 independent coders according to a codebook. RESULTS: Of the 415/476 (87.2%) relevant posts extracted, most posts were on Instagram (360/415, 86.8%). Most posts (308/415, 74.2%) related thematically to exercise, and 81/415 (19.6%) related thematically to food. In total, 151 (36.4%) posts depicted only female subjects and 114/415 (27.5%) depicted only male subjects. Female subjects were typically thin but toned; male subjects were often muscular or hypermuscular. Within the images, female subjects were significantly more likely to be aged under 25 years (P<.001) than the male subjects, to have their full body visible (P=.001), and to have their buttocks emphasized (P<.001). Male subjects were more likely to have their face visible in the post (P=.005) than the female subjects. Female subjects were more likely to be sexualized than the male subjects (P=.002). CONCLUSIONS: Female #fitspo subjects typically adhered to the thin or athletic ideal, and male subjects typically adhered to the muscular ideal. Future research and interventional efforts should consider the potential objectifying messages in fitspiration, as it relates to both female and male body image.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.6368

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 278

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [10]Prichard I Drummond C Drummond M Tiggemann M Images of inspiration? The effects of viewing different types of #Fitspo images on mood, body image and exercise behaviour 2015 Youth Health Conference 2015 Melbourne, Australia
  2. [14]McCray J The effects of exposure to images of the male muscular ideal on body image and muscularity concerns in men. Dissertation 2005 Grand Forks The University of North Dakota 1 262

Authors
Carrotte, E. R., Prichard, I., & Lim, M. S. C.
Affiliations
  • Burnet Institute (AU)
  • Flinders University (AU)
Corresponding author
Carrotte, Elise Rose
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2017-03-29
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
e95
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2600880961
Cited by
278
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 3
FWCI
25.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Burnet Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
fitspiration, body image, gender differences, social media, sexualization, objectification, physical activity, thin ideal, muscular ideal, Instagram, food images, female body image
MeSH terms
Body Image, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Male, Physical Fitness, Exercise, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review