Cited by 156Barrier Structure and Function StudiesDrug Solubulity and Delivery SystemsAdvanced Drug Delivery Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Safety concerns over the use of intestinal permeation enhancers: A mini-review

Open access

Abstract

Intestinal permeation enhancers (PEs) are key components in ∼12 oral peptide formulations in clinical trials for a range of molecules, primarily insulin and glucagon-like-peptide 1 (GLP-1) analogs. The main PEs comprise medium chain fatty acid-based systems (sodium caprate, sodium caprylate, and N-[8-(2-hydroxybenzoyl) amino] caprylate (SNAC)), bile salts, acyl carnitines, and EDTA. Their mechanism of action is complex with subtle differences between the different molecules. With the exception of SNAC and EDTA, most PEs fluidize the plasma membrane causing plasma membrane perturbation, as well as enzymatic and intracellular mediator changes that lead to alteration of intestinal epithelial tight junction protein expression. The question arises as to whether PEs can cause irreversible epithelial damage and tight junction openings sufficient to permit co-absorption of payloads with bystander pathogens, lipopolysaccharides and its fragment, or exo- and endotoxins that may be associated with sepsis, inflammation and autoimmune conditions. Most PEs seem to cause membrane perturbation to varying extents that is rapidly reversible, and overall evidence of pathogen co-absorption is generally lacking. It is unknown however, whether the intestinal epithelial damage-repair cycle is sustained during repeat-dosing regimens for chronic therapy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21688370.2016.1176822

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At the SNAC dosage of 300 mg per tablet of oral semaglutide, it is well below the toxic dose of 1.8 g/kg/day observed in monkeys, where it caused nausea and diarrhea.

    “at the SNAC dosage of 300 mg per tablet of oral semaglutide, it is well below the toxic dose of 1.8 g/kg/day observed in monkeys, where it caused nausea and diarrhea”

    From Safety of Semaglutide (2021) · cites this paper as [133]

  • SNAC can be toxic at high doses.

    “One important co-product in oral semaglutide, SNAC, can be toxic at high doses”

    From Safety of Semaglutide (2021) · cites this paper as [133]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. 10.1016/j.addr.2016.02.004 · DOI
  2. 10.4155/ppa.14.15 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.addr.2016.01.010 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/bcp.12557 · DOI
  5. 10.1177/1932296814529988 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.09.016 · DOI
  7. 10.1208/s12248-011-9307-4 · DOI
  8. Curatolo WJ, 1994, Drug absorption enhancement - concepts, possibilities, limitations and trends, 367
  9. 10.1271/bbb.61.1150 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.addr.2009.09.006 · DOI
  11. 10.3109/03639045.2012.723219 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2014.10.008 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.05.013 · DOI
  14. 10.4155/tde.11.132 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.051 · DOI
  16. 10.1517/17425247.3.5.685 · DOI
  17. 10.1210/jc.2014-4113 · DOI
  18. 10.1210/jc.2012-1179 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1007/s11095-014-1303-9 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.joca.2009.08.004 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.ejps.2012.04.023 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.ejps.2005.03.003 · DOI
  23. 10.1023/A:1012192115828 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/s11095-007-9438-6 · DOI
  25. 10.1177/1091581809337737 · DOI
  26. Bittner B, 2012, Die Pharmazie, 67, 233
  27. 10.1359/JBMR.040715 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.joca.2014.12.019 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.05.088 · DOI
  30. Duizer E, 1998, J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 287, 395, 10.1016/S0022-3565(24)37802-4 · DOI
  31. Hochman JH, 1994, J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 269, 813, 10.1016/S0022-3565(25)38767-7 · DOI
  32. 10.4155/tde.14.111 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.bone.2012.11.045 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01153.x · DOI
  35. 10.1038/nrd2197 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6017(200004)89:4%3c429::AID-JPS1%3e3.0.CO;2-J · DOI
  37. 10.4155/tde.10.5 · DOI
  38. 10.1021/mp500776a · DOI
  39. 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01942.x · DOI
  40. 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.05.030 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/s11095-007-9509-8 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.autrev.2015.01.009 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1023/A:1018984731584 · DOI
  44. 10.1038/nrm3721 · DOI
  45. 10.1152/physrev.00012.2006 · DOI
  46. Gookin JL, 2003, Am J Physiol, 285, G967
  47. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.09.022 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1038/nprot.2007.303 · DOI
  49. 10.2174/092986708784872393 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1097/00024382-199807000-00008 · DOI
  51. 10.1086/315784 · DOI
  52. 10.1152/physrev.00019.2012 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.10.014 · DOI
  54. 10.2133/dmpk.19.33 · DOI
  55. 10.1046/j.1365-2362.2001.00792.x · DOI
  56. 10.1083/jcb.145.4.689 · DOI
  57. 10.1002/jps.21961 · DOI
  58. 10.1007/s11095-007-9354-9 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.07.086 · DOI
  60. 10.1248/bpb.b14-00517 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.tem.2015.03.009 · DOI
  62. 10.1159/000069009 · DOI
  63. Chen T, 2014, Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol, 32, 345
  64. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04037.x · DOI
  65. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2010.03639.x · DOI
  66. 10.1371/journal.pone.0096864 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1016/j.ejps.2012.08.010 · DOI
  68. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.035 · DOI
  69. 10.1016/j.ejps.2013.01.009 · DOI
  70. 10.1016/j.peptides.2015.05.009 · DOI
  71. 10.1016/j.peptides.2008.03.021 · DOI
  72. 10.1111/j.2042-7158.2011.01391.x · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1007/BF03189357 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McCartney, F., Gleeson, J. P., & Brayden, D. J.
Affiliations
University College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Brayden, David J.
Venue
Tissue Barriers
Published
2016-04-02
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
e1176822
ISSN
  • 2168-8362 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-8370
OpenAlex
W2337192313
Cited by
156
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tissue Barriers (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • European Commission (2007–2013, FP7 2007-2013, FP7/2007, 281035)
  • Science Foundation Ireland (13/RC/2073)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
Keywords
oral peptide delivery, insulin, GLP-1 analogues, medium-chain fatty acids, sodium caprate, sodium caprylate, SNAC, bile salts, acylcarnitines, EDTA, tight junction proteins, intestinal epithelial damage, sepsis, inflammation, autoimmune disease
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Membrane, Decanoic Acids, Drug Carriers, Humans, Intestinal Absorption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review