Cited by 136Emotional Labor in ProfessionsStress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and Burnout

Emotional facet of language teaching: emotion regulation and emotional labor strategies as predictors of teacher burnout

Ghanizadeh, Afsaneh, Royaei, Nahid·2015·International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning

Abstract

This study attempted to scrutinize the multidimensional nature of teacher emotion. Three emotion-associated constructs, namely, emotion regulation, emotional labor strategies, and burnout were studied within a single framework. In particular, it was hypothesized that English as a foreign language teachers’ emotion regulation and emotional labor strategies influence teacher burnout. The results yielded via structural equation modeling substantiated the negative role of these constructs in burnout. The emotion regulation was measured via the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire developed by Gross and John. The scale comprises two subscales: cognitive reappraisal (an antecedent-focused factor aimed at changing the way a situation is construed so as to decrease its emotional impact) and expressive suppression (a response-focused element targeted at inhibiting the outward signs of inner feelings). Emotional labor strategies were assessed through the Teacher Emotional Labor Strategy Scale designed by Yin. This test consists of three parts: surface acting (which refers to strategy in which people hinder and cover their felt emotions or fake unfelt feeling for the aim of showing the appropriate emotions needed for their profession), deep acting (which refers to the kind of strategy in which individuals try to change their felt emotions with the aid of some cognitive techniques, such as distraction so as the appropriate emotion occurs), and natural acting (which refers to the instance when individuals simultaneously experience and present the appropriate emotion for their job). Burnout was measured by the Maslach Burnout Inventory comprising three subscales: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/22040552.2015.1113847

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghanizadeh, A., & Royaei, N.
Affiliations
Imam Reza International University (IR)
Corresponding author
Ghanizadeh, Afsaneh
Venue
International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning
Published
2015-05-04
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
139-150
ISSN
  • 1833-4105 (ISSN-L)
  • 2204-0552
OpenAlex
W2188195983
Cited by
136
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
26.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Emotional Labor in Professions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
teacher burnout, emotion regulation, emotional labor strategies, EFL teachers, cognitive reappraisal, expressive suppression, surface acting, deep acting, emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, personal accomplishment, teacher emotions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review