Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 0

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multicultural and social justice competencies for school stakeholders: a Delphi study

Leibowitz-Nelson, Stephanie, Nassar, Sylvia, Dari, Tahani·2024·Journal of Counselor Leadership and Advocacy
DOI 10.1080/2326716x.2023.2282767
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/2326716x.2023.2282767

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. American School Counselor Association. (2019a). ASCA national model: A framework for school counseling programs (4th ed.).
  2. American School Counselor Association. (2019b) . ASCA school Counselor professional standards & competencies.
  3. 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2008.tb00522.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. Boyes-Watson, C., & Pranis, K. (2020). Circle forward. Living Justice Press.
  5. 10.4018/978-1-5225-5748-7.ch008 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/ceas.12165 · doi:10.1002/ceas.12165
  7. 10.1080/0144341970170401 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1002/ceas.12029 · DOI
  9. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
  10. 10.1080/2326716X.2014.996831 · doi:10.1080/2326716x.2014.996831
  11. 10.1016/S0016-3287(69)80025-X · DOI · Paper page
  12. Dalkey, N. C. (1972). The Delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion. In N. C. Dalkey, D. L. Rourke, R. Lewis, & D. Snyder (Eds.), Studies in the quality of life: Delphi and decision-making (pp. 13–54). Lexington Books.
  13. 10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.7290/tsc04q91z · DOI
  15. 10.1080/13603124.2016.1206972 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/07481180902805715 · DOI
  17. 10.5330/1096-2409-19.1.166 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00072.x · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1002/j.2161-007X.2011.tb01028.x · doi:10.1002/j.2161-007x.2011.tb01028.x
  20. 10.1007/s40617-015-0045-4 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Hsu, C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(10), 1–8.
  22. Iqbal, S., & Pipon-Young, L. (2009). The Delphi method. The Psychologist, 22(7), 598–600.
  23. 10.1002/ceas.12253 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2011.tb00101.x · DOI
  25. 10.1002/9781444392029 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1080/2326716X.2020.1727384 · DOI
  27. 10.1177/0022167812469831 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/ceas.1225 · doi:10.1002/ceas.1225
  29. Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
  30. 10.1080/13632752.2021.2012962 · DOI
  31. 10.3310/hta2030 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1186/s40461-019-0080-4 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/s10775-019-09410-6 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/j.2161-007X.2011.tb01031.x · doi:10.1002/j.2161-007x.2011.tb01031.x
  35. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.x · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.5330/PSC.n.2010-11.90 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1177/2156759X18773582 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1002/jmcd.12094 · DOI
  39. 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2009.tb00106.x · DOI
  40. 10.1002/jmcd.12035 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1999.tb02423.x · DOI
  42. 10.1177/2156759X19834293 · DOI
  43. Scheele, D. S. (1975). Reality construction as a product of Delphi interaction. In H. A. Linstone & M. Turoff (Eds.), The Delphi method: Techniques and applications (pp. 37–71). Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
  44. 10.5330/1096-2409-20.1a.47 · DOI
  45. 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1992.tb01642.x · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1080/2372966X.2022.2139131 · DOI
  47. 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00810.x · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1177/00343552070500020101 · DOI
  49. 10.1177/0011000003031003001 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1002/j.1556-6676.2014.00171.x · doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.2014.00171.x
  51. Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. (2009). Research methods in education: An introduction (9th ed.). Pearson Education.
  52. Wilhelm, W. J. (2001). Alchemy of the oracle: The Delphi technique. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 43(1), 6–26.
  53. 10.1177/0011000003261358 · DOI
  54. Ziglio, E. (1996). The Delphi method and its contributions to decision-making. In M. Adler & E. Ziglio (Eds.), Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi method and its applications to social policy and public health (pp. 3–33). Jessica Kinglsea Publishers.

Metadata

Authors
Leibowitz-Nelson, S., Nassar, S., & Dari, T.
Venue
Journal of Counselor Leadership and Advocacy
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2023-11-22
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
16-34
ISSN
  • 2326-716X
  • 2326-7178
DOI
10.1080/2326716x.2023.2282767
Cited by
0
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multicultural and social justice competencies for school stakeholders: a Delphi study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/2326716x.2023.2282767
The paper
Leibowitz-Nelson, S., Nassar, S., & Dari, T. (2024). Multicultural and social justice competencies for school stakeholders: a Delphi study. Journal of Counselor Leadership and Advocacy. https://doi.org/10.1080/2326716x.2023.2282767

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.