Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 190

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Benefits of Dietary Butyric Acid, Sodium Butyrate, and Their Protected Forms in Aquafeeds: A Review

Abdel-Latif, Hany M. R., Abdel-Tawwab, Mohsen, Dawood, Mahmoud A. O., Menanteau-Ledouble, Simon, El-Matbouli, Mansour·2020·Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture

Abstract

Excessive application of antibiotics to control fish and shrimp diseases in aquaculture has been associated with several drawbacks, such as immune suppression, development of antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains, and elevated levels of antibiotic residues in animal products. To overcome this problem and to promote fish health and their productivity, several immunostimulants have been used as additives in aquafeeds. In this regard, interest in the research on the use of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) in aquafeeds is increasing tremendously, as they exert several beneficial effects on farmed fish and shrimp. Among SCFA, butyric acid (BA); its salts, such as sodium butyrate (SB); and their protected forms have attracted particular attention of researchers as growth promoters and immunostimulants as well as for their antioxidant properties. Until date, extensive studies have been conducted on the beneficial effects of BA, SB, and their protected forms on growth performance, feed utilization, proximate body composition, intestinal health status (gut microbial communities, the histo-morphological structure of the intestinal villi, and digestive enzymes), antioxidant properties, haemato-immunological functions, expression of immune genes and pro-inflammatory cytokines, and resistance of fish and shrimp to diseases. These studies have demonstrated SCFA as promising feed additives in aquaculture. The present review article summarizes the beneficial effects of dietary supplementation of BA, SB, and their protected forms on aquatic organisms. Furthermore, the review discusses the information available pertaining to their modes of action.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/23308249.2020.1758899

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 190

Metadata

Authors
Abdel-Latif, H. M. R., Abdel-Tawwab, M., Dawood, M. A. O., Menanteau-Ledouble, S., & El-Matbouli, M.
Venue
Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture
Published
2020-05-04
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
421-448
ISSN
  • 2330-8249 (ISSN-L)
  • 2330-8257
OpenAlex
W3021438876
Cited by
190
References
2
FWCI
16.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Benefits of Dietary Butyric Acid, Sodium Butyrate, and Their Protected Forms in Aquafeeds: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/23308249.2020.1758899
The paper
Abdel-Latif, H. M. R., Abdel-Tawwab, M., Dawood, M. A. O., Menanteau-Ledouble, S., & El-Matbouli, M. (2020). Benefits of Dietary Butyric Acid, Sodium Butyrate, and Their Protected Forms in Aquafeeds: A Review. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture. https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2020.1758899

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.