Cited by 39Corporate Social Responsibility ReportingEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessAuditing, Earnings Management, Governance

Sustainability reporting and greenwashing: A bibliometrics assessment in G7 and non-G7 nations

Open access
Sundarasen, Sheela, Zyznarska-Dworczak, Beata, Goel, Sanjay·2024·Cogent Business & Management

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the scholarly work and discussion on greenwashing in sustainability reporting (GiSR) and tease out dominant themes that emerge from the literature, and the different emphasis of research between G7 and non-G7 nations. Based on a total of 87 articles from the Web of Science (WoS) database, this study adopts the bibliometrics and content analysis approach, which uses both numerical and visualization techniques to examine the extant literature from 2003 – 2022. The outcomes of the scientific bibliographic coupling identified three dominant themes: (i) Greenwashing (exaggeration of green effort); (ii) ESG disclosures and performance gap and (iii); Communicative legitimation strategies and reporting of negative aspects. Results highlighted overlaps and differences between G7 and non-G7 countries, and the need for further research in non-G7 countries on the institutional, cultural, and socioeconomic variances on greenwashing, firm-level variations in behavior, leadership and strategy on greenwashing, the use of technology in detecting greenwashing, as well as the role of regulatory and governance in corporate reporting to mitigate greenwashing. This study hopes to attract the attention of researchers, policymakers, and businesses to counteract greenwashing by recognizing its determinants and contribute to the quality and credibility of sustainability reporting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/23311975.2024.2320812

Cites

91 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Systematic literature reviews highlight the pervasiveness of selective and exaggerated ESG disclosures that undermine the credibility of sustainability reporting.

    “Systematic literature reviews further highlight the pervasiveness of selective and exaggerated ESG disclosures that undermine the credibility of sustainability reporting, emphasizing the importance of stronger verification mechanisms and governance safeguards to counter greenwashing risks [22,23].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. The Academy of Management Annals , 3 (1), 403-445.
  2. Hadro, D., Fijałkowska, J., Daszyńska-Żygadło, K., Zumente, I., & Mjakuškina, S. (2022). What do stakeholders in the construction industry look for in non-financial disclosure and what do they get? Meditari Accountancy Research , 30 (3), 762-785. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-11-2020-1093/FULL/PDF · DOI
  3. Khalil, S., & O'Sullivan, P . (2017). Corporate social responsibility: Internet social and environmental reporting by banks. Meditari Accountancy Research , 25 (3), 414-446. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-10-2016-0082/FULL/PDF · DOI
  4. Kurpierz, J. R., & Smith, K. (2020). The greenwashing triangle: Adapting tools from fraud to improve CSR reporting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal , 11 (6), 1075-1093. https://doi.org/10.1108/ SAMPJ-10-2018-0272/FULL/PDF
  5. Ruiz-Blanco, S., Romero, S., & Fernandez-Feijoo, B. (2022). Green, blue or black, but washing-What company characteristics determine greenwashing? Environment, Development and Sustainability , 24 (3), 4024-4045. https://doi. org/10.1007/S10668-021-01602-X/TABLES/8 · DOI
  6. Sial, M. S., Chunmei, Z., Khan, T., & Nguyen, V. K. (2018). Corporate social responsibility, firm performance and the moderating effect of earnings management in Chinese firms. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration , 10 (2/3), 184-199. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-03-2018-0051/FULL/PDF · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sundarasen, S., Zyznarska-Dworczak, B., & Goel, S.
Affiliations
  • Prince Sultan University (SA)
  • Poznań University of Economics and Business (PL)
  • University of North Dakota (US)
Corresponding author
Sundarasen, Sheela
Venue
Cogent Business & Management
Published
2024-03-11
Volume
11
Issue
1
ISSN
2331-1975 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392647524
Cited by
39
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 7
FWCI
13.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cogent Business & Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Prince Sultan University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Keywords
greenwashing, sustainability reporting, ESG disclosure, corporate governance, research trends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review