Cited by 14Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionChildren's Physical and Motor Development

Development of postural stability in children with autism spectrum disorder: a cross-sectional study

Open access
Li, Yumeng, Liu, Ting, Venuti, Carrie E.·2021·International Biomechanics

Abstract

The purpose was to investigate the effects of age on postural stability for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Twenty-nine children with mild ASD were assigned into one of the three groups: 6–8 years (U8), 9–11 years (U11) and 12–14 years (U14). Participants stood barefoot with both feet on a force platform and maintained stationary for 15 seconds during eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. Center of pressure data were collected and variables were calculated, including displacements, total distances, sway areas, and sample entropy. The variables were compared among the three groups using a mixed-model ANOVA. The age group effect was significant for mediolateral center of pressure displacement (p = 0.04) and sway distance (p = 0.02). Post-hoc comparisons revealed that U8 exhibited greater mediolateral displacement and total distance compared to U14, regardless of test conditions. The U14 group exhibited improved mediolateral postural stability compared to U8, whereas no differences were found between U8 and U11 or between U11 and U14. This may suggest that children with ASD could slowly develop postural stability but only demonstrate significant changes over a long period of time. Early intervention programs aimed to improve complexity of postural control could be beneficial.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This cross-sectional study examined age effects on postural stability in 29 children with mild autism spectrum disorder (ASD) aged 6–14 years. Older children (12–14 years) showed better mediolateral postural stability than the youngest group (6–8 years), but no significant differences appeared between adjacent age groups or in COP complexity.

Key findings

  • Age group significantly affected mediolateral COP displacement (F2,26 = 3.68, p = 0.04, partial ω² = 0.15) and total COP sway distance (F2,26 = 4.70, p = 0.02, partial ω² = 0.20).
  • Post-hoc tests showed U8 had greater mediolateral displacement than U14 (95% CI difference: 0.3–9.1 cm, p = 0.03) and greater total distance than U14 (95% CI difference: 6.1–72.5 cm, p = 0.02), regardless of test condition.
  • No significant differences were found between U8 and U11 or between U11 and U14; other COP variables, including sample entropy, showed no significant age group effect (p = 0.13–0.71).
  • Eyes-closed condition significantly increased mediolateral displacement (p = 0.05), total distance (p = 0.01), and sway area (p = 0.00) across groups.

Methods

  • Cross-sectional design with 29 children with level one (mild) ASD recruited from a local autism summer camp and assigned to U8 (n = 9), U11 (n = 12), and U14 (n = 8) age groups.
  • Participants stood barefoot on a portable force platform for 15 seconds during eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions; COP data were collected at 100 Hz, and variables included displacements, total distance, sway area, and sample entropy.
  • COP variables were compared among age groups using mixed-model ANOVA with test condition as within-subject factor and age group as between-subject factor, followed by Tukey’s HSD post-hoc tests; portable force plate validity and reliability were checked in a sub-sample (n = 5).

Limitations

  • The authors state the cross-sectional design meant factors other than age, such as intelligence quotient, were not strictly controlled; physical activity participation was not an inclusion/exclusion criterion; sex distribution differed among groups; the 15-second sample duration may limit sample entropy analysis; and vision was not controlled during eyes-open trials.
  • The paper also notes large within-group variability, especially for sway area, which may have reduced the ability to detect between-group differences.
  • Evident from the text: the sample was small (29 total, 8–12 per group), no healthy control group was recruited, and the study tested only quiet standing, limiting generalization to other postural tasks.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/23335432.2021.1968316

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 42 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    In children with ASD, the age group effect was significant for mediolateral center of pressure displacement (F2,26 = 3.68, p = 0.04, Partial ω2 = 0.15).

    “the age group effect was significant for mediolateral COP displacement (F2,26 = 3.68, p = 0.04, Partial ω2 = 0.15)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In children with ASD, the U8 group exhibited greater mediolateral COP displacement than the U14 group, regardless of test condition (95% confidence interval difference: 0.3-9.1 cm, p = 0.03).

    “Post-hoc comparisons revealed that the group U8 exhibited greater mediolateral displacement (95% confidence interval difference: 0.3–9.1 cm, p = 0.03) compared to U14, regardless of test conditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In children with ASD, the condition effect was significant for sway area (F1,26 = 10.04, p = 0.00, Partial ω2 = 0.24).

    “sway area (F1,26 = 10.04, p = 0.00, Partial ω2 = 0.24)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In children with ASD, anteroposterior COP sway displacement did not demonstrate any age-related changes.

    “Interestingly, the anteroposterior COP sway displacement did not demonstrate any age-related changes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In children with ASD, the interaction effect of age group by condition was nonsignificant for all COP variables (p = 0.09-0.42).

    “The interaction effect of age group by condition was nonsignificant for all COP variables (p = 0.09–0.42).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 16
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 21
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In children with ASD, no significant post-hoc differences were observed between U8 and U11 or between U11 and U14.

    “However, no significant differences were observed between U8 and U11 or between U11 and U14.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In children with ASD, all age groups had greater mediolateral displacement, total distance, and sway area during eyes-closed conditions compared to eyes-open conditions.

    “All groups had greater values of mediolateral displacement, total distance and sway area during the eyes-closed conditions compared to eyes-open conditions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Age-related postural control changes were not observed between U8 and U11 or between U11 and U14.

    “Age-related postural control changes were not observed between U8 and U11 or between U11 and U14.”
    • Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
      “whereas no differences were found between U8 and U11 or between U11 and U14.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Children with ASD may slowly develop postural stability but only demonstrate significant changes over a long period of time.

    “This may suggest that children with ASD could slowly develop postural stability but only demonstrate significant changes over a long period of time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Previous research has demonstrated that ASD could result in delayed development or even permanent impairments of postural stability.

    “Previous research has demonstrated that ASD could result in delayed development or even permanent impairments of postural stability (Lim et al. 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lim et al. 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Children with ASD did not start to improve postural stability until age 12 and achieved a similar improvement rate as healthy controls from age 12 to 20.

    “Previous research demonstrated that children with ASD did not start to improve postural stability until age 12 and achieved a similar improvement rate as healthy controls from age 12 to 20 (Minshew et al. 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Minshew et al. 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In individuals with ASD, postural stability did not show improvement until age 12 and never achieved the level of healthy adults.

    “Researchers observed that postural stability in individuals with ASD did not show improvement until age 12 and never achieved the level of healthy adults (Minshew et al. 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Minshew et al. 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The large age range (5-52 years) in the previous study could have caused a nonlinear curve to be over-smoothed and distorted the pattern in the young age range.

    “Because of the large age range (5–52 years) used in the previous study, a nonlinear curve (regression) could have been over-smoothed to fit all data but potentially distorted the pattern in the young age range (e.g. 6–14 years).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A lack of complexity in postural control has been suggested to be early marker of developmental disabilities.

    “A lack of complexity in postural control has been suggested to be early marker of developmental disabilities (Dusing and Harbourne 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dusing and Harbourne 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Children with ASD could develop postural control strategies through the hip mechanism from age 8 to 14, but the ankle strategy may remain unchanged.

    “Our findings may suggest that children with ASD could develop postural control strategies through the hip mechanism from age 8 to 14, but the ankle strategy may remain unchanged.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Age has been associated with gross motor skills in children with ASD.

    “Though age has been associated with gross motor skills in children with ASD (Mache and Todd 2016)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mache and Todd 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Sway area has been reported to be greater in children with ASD compared to age-matched healthy controls.

    “The sway area is a commonly utilized measure to assess the magnitude of COP sway and has been reported to be greater in children with ASD compared to age-matched healthy controls (Radonovich et al. 2013; Mache and Todd 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Radonovich et al. 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Mache and Todd 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The previous study performed sensory organization tests using the NeuroCom system, whereas we tested quiet standing using a force plate.

    “Second, the previous study performed sensory organization tests using the NeuroCom® system (NeuroCom International Inc., Clackamas, OR), whereas we tested quiet standing using a force plate.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The majority of studies have observed greater COP sway magnitudes in children with ASD, while other studies found no differences during the eyes-open condition or all testing conditions.

    “The majority of studies have observed greater COP sway magnitudes in children with ASD, while other studies found no differences during the eyes-open condition (Doumas et al. 2016) or all testing conditions (Greffou et al. 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Doumas et al. 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Greffou et al. 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The portable force plate's validity for measuring COP was examined; paired t-tests indicated that differences in COP variables between the portable and floor-embedded force plates were minimal (difference = 1.4-7.3%; t = 0.04-1.95; p = 0.12-0.90).

    “Paired t-tests (Table 2) indicated that the differences in COP variables between the two force plates were minimal (difference = 1.4–7.3%; t = 0.04–1.95; p = 0.12–0.90).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Different samples of participants (high functioning vs mild ASD) could contribute to the discrepancy.

    “First, different samples of participants were tested (i.e. high functioning in the previous study vs. mild ASD in the present study).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Greater complexity represents a more dynamic, resilient and adaptive postural control system.

    “whereas greater complexity represents a more dynamic, resilient and adaptive postural control system (Wayne et al. 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wayne et al. 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Lower complexity could indicate a more repetitive and restricted sway pattern that may be more vulnerable to external perturbations.

    “In general, lower complexity could indicate a more repetitive and restricted sway pattern that may be more vulnerable to external perturbations (Borg and Laxåback 2010)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Borg and Laxåback 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Large within-group variations could have decreased the F value and resulted in nonsignificant between-group differences for sway area.

    “However, the large within-group variations (Table 3: standard deviations were close to mean values of sway area) could have decreased the F value (ratio of between-group variability to within-group variability) and resulted in nonsignificant between-group differences.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Children with ASD could progressively develop postural stability but only demonstrate significant changes when a long period of time is analyzed (e.g. from age 6 to 14).

    “This may suggest that children with ASD could progressively develop postural stability but only demonstrate significant changes when a long period of time is analyzed (e.g. from age 6 to 14).”
    • Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
      “These findings may suggest that children with ASD may slowly develop postural stability but only demonstrate significant changes over a long period of time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    No outliers were detected using Chauvenet's criterion.

    “No outliers were detected using Chauvenet’s criterion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The development of mediolateral postural stability could potentially reduce the risk of fall and facilitate participation in physical activities.

    “The development of mediolateral postural stability could potentially reduce the risk of fall and facilitate participation in physical activities because impairments in mediolateral stability have been particularly associated with the risk of falling (Maki et al. 1994; Brauer et al. 2000).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Maki et al. 1994

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Brauer et al. 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Different statistical analyses (regression vs ANOVA) could contribute to the discrepancy.

    “Lastly, different statistical analyses were employed to assess the effect of age (i.e. regression vs. ANOVA).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Sample entropy of a longer duration (1 minute) displayed a better ability to discriminate between groups.

    “Fourth, a 15-second sample duration may be a limitation for sample entropy analysis, because sample entropy of a longer duration (i.e. 1 minute) displayed a better ability to discriminate between groups (Montesinos et al. 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Montesinos et al. 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All participants were able to complete a series of physical activities in the autism summer camp.

    “Moreover, all participants were able to complete a series of physical activities (e.g. running, chasing, jumping, landing, throwing and catching a ball) in the autism summer camp.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Intelligence quotient scores had a small but significant effect on postural stability.

    “According to previous research, the intelligence quotient scores had a small but significant effect on postural stability (Minshew et al. 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Minshew et al. 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Uncontrolled vision could potentially influence postural sway patterns.

    “Lastly, during eyes-open test conditions, participants’ vision was not controlled, which could potentially influence postural sway patterns.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    We tried to minimize the influence of physical activity level by excluding participants with physical impairments.

    “However, we tried to minimize the influence of physical activity level by excluding participants with physical impairments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    During eyes-open test conditions, participants' vision was not controlled.

    “Lastly, during eyes-open test conditions, participants’ vision was not controlled, which could potentially influence postural sway patterns.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    All participants recruited had level one autism (mild) and were able to complete motor competence assessments.

    “However, all participants recruited in the present study had level one autism (mild) and were able to complete a series of motor competence assessments (i.e. Bruininks–Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-2 (Bruininks et al. 2007) and Movement Assessment Battery-2 (Henderson et al. 2007)).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bruininks et al. 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Henderson et al. 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Participation in physical activity was not listed in the inclusionary or exclusionary criteria.

    “Second, participation in physical activity was not listed in the inclusionary or exclusionary criteria.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Different levels of physical activity participation could lead to different postural stability.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Any trial with obvious head movements was excluded from analysis.

    “Though their vision may not focus on the same spot during the trial, any trial with obvious head movements (e.g. looking around) was excluded from analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The sample size of females and males is different among groups.

    “Third, the sample size of females and males is different among groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The nonsignificant group difference indicates that postural control adaptability remains unchanged from age 6 to 14 possibly due to brain dysfunction.

    “The nonsignificant group difference indicates that postural control adaptability remains unchanged from age 6 to 14 possibly due to brain dysfunction (e.g. dysfunction in basal ganglia and motor cortex) (Kohen-Raz et al. 1992).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kohen-Raz et al. 1992

      Not checked in the free run.

34 of 34
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Age-related changes in postural stability in children with ASD are not well understood, and studies examining them are very limited.

    “development of postural control in ASD is still not well understood”
    “studies examining age-related changes in postural stability of children with ASD are still very limited”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Different levels of physical activity participation could lead to different postural stability.

    “Different levels of physical activity participation could lead to different postural stability.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    It was very difficult for young children with ASD to remain focused and maintain still for a long period.

    “However, it was very difficult for young children with ASD to remain focused and maintain still for a long period.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children with ASD demonstrate slower development of postural control mechanisms compared to their peers.

    “Children with ASD demonstrate slower development of postural control mechanisms compared to their peers.”

    From Postural Differences in Speaking Versus Non-Speaking Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (2025) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Discussion says children with ASD “may exhibit a slower rate of development” than typically developing children, based on a comparison with findings from another study. The claim presents that tentative comparison as established and refers to development of postural control mechanisms, which this study did not directly compare with peers; its Methods state that no control group was recruited. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Children with ASD generally exhibit an incorrect arrangement of body segments relative to each other.

    “Children with ASD generally exhibit an incorrect arrangement of body segments relative to each other [12,13,14].”

    From Postural Differences in Speaking Versus Non-Speaking Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (2025) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Introduction reports impaired postural stability and greater postural sway in children with ASD, but does not describe how their body segments are arranged relative to one another. The Methods > Data analysis section measures center-of-pressure sway, not body-segment alignment; a search for postural alignment and segment positioning found no passage addressing the claim. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Mediolateral condition effect is called significant despite the stated threshold

    Minor

    For F(1,26) = 4.01, the p-value is approximately 0.056, above the paper's p < 0.05 threshold. The reported p = 0.05 and designation as significant are inconsistent with that F statistic and threshold.

  • U14 mediolateral displacement decreases with eyes closed

    Minor

    The claim applies to all groups, but U14's mean mediolateral displacement is 3.4 cm with eyes closed versus 3.9 cm with eyes open.

  • Reported interaction p-value range omits a table value

    Minor

    The results give 0.42 as the highest age-group-by-condition p-value, but Table 3 reports 0.94 for anteroposterior displacement.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bruininks RH, 2007, Rev Bruininks-Oseretsky Test Mot Proficiency, Second Ed [Internet], 27, 87
  2. Tracy JB, 2019, Int Soc Biomech Congr., 283
  3. Victorio LVG, 2019, Mot Rev Educ Fã\-sica [Internet], 25
  4. Walsh MS, 2006, J Strength Cond Res, 20, 730
  5. Zablotsky B, 2015, Natl Health Stat Report, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Y., Liu, T., & Venuti, C. E.
Affiliations
Texas State University (US)
Corresponding author
Li, Yumeng
Venue
International Biomechanics
Published
2021-01-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
54-62
ISSN
2333-5432 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3195009672
Cited by
14
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Biomechanics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, postural stability, postural control, center of pressure, age differences, children, sway, sample entropy, early intervention
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Postural Balance, Humans, Entropy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review