Cited by 186Cryptographic Implementations and SecurityCryptography and Residue ArithmeticCoding theory and cryptography

Lightweight cryptography methods

Open access
Buchanan, William J., Li, Shancang, Asif, Rameez·2017·Journal of Cyber Security Technology

Abstract

While our conventional cryptography methods, such for AES (encryption), SHA-256 (hashing) and RSA/Elliptic Curve (signing), work well on systems which have reasonable processing power and memory capabilities, these do not scale well into a world with embedded systems and sensor networks. Thus, lightweight cryptography methods are proposed to overcome many of the problems of conventional cryptography. This includes constraints related to physical size, processing requirements, memory limitation and energy drain. This paper outlines many of the techniques that are defined as replacements for conventional cryptography within an Internet of things space and discuss some trends in the design of lightweight algorithms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/23742917.2017.1384917

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mickey V2, Trivium, Grain and Enocor are lightweight stream ciphers with low resource requirements.

    “Mickey V2, Trivium, Grain and Enocor are the lightweight stream ciphers with low resource requirements as indicated in [103].”

    From Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA): A Comprehensive Survey (2022) · cites this paper as [103]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [12]12. Bertoni G, Daemen J, Peeters M, et al. Keccak. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2013. p. 313-314.
  2. [17]17. Kelsey J, Change S, Perlner R. SHA-3 derived functions: NIST Special Publication. 2016;800:185.
  3. [32]32. Fan C, Chiang T, Hsu R. Light-weight authentication and key exchange protocols with forward secrecy for digital home. J Comput. 2007;18(2):61-74.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buchanan, W. J., Li, S., & Asif, R.
Affiliations
  • Edinburgh Napier University (GB)
  • University of the West of England (GB)
Corresponding author
Buchanan, William J.
Venue
Journal of Cyber Security Technology
Published
2017-10
Volume
1
Issue
3-4
Pages
187-201
ISSN
  • 2374-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-2925
OpenAlex
W2773336602
Cited by
186
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 2
FWCI
8.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cyber Security Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Coding theory and cryptography
Keywords
lightweight cryptography, embedded systems, sensor networks, Internet of Things, resource-constrained devices, energy efficiency, lightweight algorithms, cryptographic algorithm design, hash functions, digital signatures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review