Cited by 76Student Assessment and FeedbackEvaluation of Teaching PracticesHigher Education Practises and Engagement

Exploring the “wicked” problem of student dissatisfaction with assessment and feedback in higher education

Open access
Deeley, Susan J., Fischbacher-Smith, Moira, Karadzhov, Dimitar, Koristashevskaya, Elina·2019·Higher Education Pedagogies

Abstract

Student dissatisfaction with assessment and feedback is a significant challenge for most UK Higher Education Institutions according to a key national survey. This paper explores the meaning, challenges and potential opportunities for enhancement in assessment and feedback within the authors' own institution as illustrative of approaches that can be taken elsewhere. Using a qualitative design, a review of assessment and feedback, which included an exploration of students' perceptions, was made in one College of the University. The findings highlighted variations in assessment and feedback practice across the College with dissatisfaction typically being due to misunderstanding or miscommunication between staff and students. Drawing on the review, we assert in this paper that students' dissatisfaction with assessment and feedback is not a 'tame' problem for which a straightforward solution exists. Instead, it is a 'wicked' problem that requires a complex approach with multiple interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/23752696.2019.1644659

Cites

53 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Boud, D. (2007). Reframing assessment as if learning were important. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education (pp. 14 -25). Abingdon: Routledge Chapter 2.
  2. Bovill, C., & Bulley, C.J. (2011). A model of active student participation in curriculum design: Exploring desirability and possibility. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning (18) global theories and local practices: Institutional, disciplinary and cultural variations (pp. 176 -188). Oxford: Oxford Centre for Sta ff and Educational Development.
  3. Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in university assessment . London: Routledge.
  4. Pitt, E., & Norton, L. (2016). ' Now that ' s the feedback I want! ' Students ' reactions to feedback on graded work and what they do with it. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education . doi:10.1080/020602938.2016.1142500 · DOI
  5. Price, M., Rust, C., O ' Donovan, B., Handley, K., & Bryant, R. (2012). Assessment literacy . Oxford: Oxford Brookes University.
  6. Smith, A., Pearson, E., & Hennes, L. (2016) Assessment and feedback toolkit: Student resources University of Glasgow: unpublished report.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deeley, S. J., Fischbacher-Smith, M., Karadzhov, D., & Koristashevskaya, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • Adam Smith Business School, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Corresponding author
Deeley, Susan J.
Venue
Higher Education Pedagogies
Published
2019-01-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
385-405
ISSN
2375-2696 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2977824697
Cited by
76
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1
FWCI
20.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Higher Education Pedagogies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Keywords
student dissatisfaction, assessment, feedback, wicked problems, higher education, student perceptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review