Cited by 13Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationDigital Mental Health Interventions

A randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of an acceptance and commitment therapy-based bibliotherapy intervention among adults living with chronic pain

Open access
Veillette, Josée, Martel, Marie-Eve, Dionne, Frédérick·2019·Canadian Journal of Pain

Abstract

Background Chronic pain has a significant impact on the physical and psychological functioning of those living with this condition. It is now recognized that acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is an effective intervention in managing chronic pain; however, several barriers limit its accessibility.Aims The current study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an 8-week bibliotherapy-type self-administered psychological intervention with minimal therapeutic contact, based on ACT, in the management of chronic pain.Methods This was a randomized controlled trial with three measurement periods (pretest, posttest, and 3 months after the intervention; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03924687). A total of 140 adults with chronic pain were randomly assigned to an ACT self-help condition or a wait-list control condition.Results Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) models showed statistically significant differences between pretest and posttest in terms of pain-related disability (main variable), depression (secondary variable), pain-related acceptance, and psychological inflexibility (d = 0.46–0.88) in favor of the ACT self-help condition. At the 3-month follow-up, these differences were maintained and nearly 54% of participants reported an overall improvement of their physical and mental health.Conclusion These results suggest that a psychological intervention self-administered through ACT bibliotherapy with minimal therapeutic support can improve the physical and emotional functioning of adults from the community who live with chronic pain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/24740527.2019.1678113

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For detection bias, six included studies did not explicitly indicate whether they blinded the interviewers and were assessed as some concerns.

    “For detection bias, six studies did not explicitly indicate whether they blinded the interviewers and were therefore assessed as”

    From Acceptance and commitment therapy for patients with chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis on psychological outcomes and quality of life (2024) · cites this paper as [54]

    The Methods CONSORT checklist (item 11a; page not specified) marks reporting of who was blinded, including outcome assessors, as “n/a.” This supports the narrower point that this trial does not explicitly report assessor blinding. As a single trial, it does not establish that six studies omitted interviewer-blinding details or that they were assessed as having “some concerns.” (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • On allocation concealment, one included study was assessed as high risk of bias and eight studies were assessed as unclear risk of bias.

    “On allocation concealment, one study was assessed as”

    From Acceptance and commitment therapy for patients with chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis on psychological outcomes and quality of life (2024) · cites this paper as [54]

    The Methods CONSORT checklist (page not specified) marks the trial’s allocation-concealment mechanism as “n/a.” A search for allocation-concealment risk assessments found no passage classifying one study as high risk and eight as unclear risk. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [44]Martel M-E, Dionne F, Gauchet A, Zouikri-Roland Y, Decker E, Trouillet R, Wicksell R, Monestès J-L Psychological inflexibility for pain: translation and validation for a French-speaking population. Poster presented at: the ACBS Annual World Conference; 2015; Berlin, Germany.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Veillette, J., Martel, M.-E., & Dionne, F.
Affiliations
  • Réseau québécois de recherche sur la douleur (CA)
  • Department of Psychology, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada
Corresponding author
Dionne, Frédérick
Venue
Canadian Journal of Pain
Published
2019-01
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
209-225
ISSN
2474-0527 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2981015414
Cited by
13
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Pain (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Fonds de recherche québécois société et culture (2016-NP-189887)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, bibliotherapy, chronic pain, self-help intervention, pain-related disability, depression, pain acceptance, psychological inflexibility, community-dwelling adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review