Cited by 147Memory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and TherapyCognitive Functions and Memory

The Effect of Imageability and Predicability of Cues in Autobiographical Memory

Williams, J.M.G., Healy, H.G., Ellis, N.C.·1999·The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A

Abstract

Four experiments investigated the role of imagery in the recollection of autobiographical memories. The first two experiments examined the effects of word imageability and word frequency on the retrieval of personal memories in a cued autobiographical memory task. They showed that the imageability of cues (but not frequency) mediates specificity in the recall of personal memories. Experiment 2 explored how different imagery modalities (visual, olfactory, tactile, auditory, and motor) influence autobiographical retrieval. Consistent with research on imagery modalities in verbal learning paradigms, visual imageability emerged as the most significant predictor of specificity. Experiments 3 and 4 examined how far a knowledge-based account of imagery effects might account for these effects, using predicability as a measure of semantic richness of a cue. Results found that visual imageability of cues accounted for more variance in specificity of recall than did predicability. The results are explained in terms of the way images represent the most efficient form of summarizing the information that can be used at each stage of the recollection process: setting the retrieval plan, strategic search, and evaluation of candidate episodes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/713755828

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Specific memories are more likely to involve mental imagery than general memories.

    “Research has shown (Williams et al., 1999) that specific memories are more likely to involve mental imagery than general memories.”

    From How personal nostalgia influences giving to charity (2011) · cites this paper as Williams et al., 1999

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, J. M. G., Healy, H. G., & Ellis, N. C.
Affiliations
Bangor University (GB)
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A
Published
1999-08
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
555-579
ISSN
  • 0272-4987 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0740
OpenAlex
W2036996088
Cited by
147
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
autobiographical memory, imagery, imageability, word frequency, visual imagery, olfactory imagery, tactile imagery, auditory imagery, motor imagery, semantic richness, memory retrieval
MeSH terms
Adult, Autobiographies as Topic, Cues, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Semantics, Sensitivity and Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review