The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Messages Influencing College Women's Tanning Bed Use: Statistical versus Narrative Evidence Format and a Self-Assessment to Increase Perceived Susceptibility
Abstract
Understanding the effect of messages and other influences on health decision-making has the potential to decrease risky behavior such as tanning bed use. This study explores the effect of type of evidence, self-assessments of risk for skin cancer, and personality factors on intention to use and use of tanning beds among Caucasian female college students. Specifically, it targeted the perceived susceptibility component of the Health Belief Model and its impact on intention to tan as well as changes in actual tanning behavior. College students (N=141) in the southeast United States read randomly assigned messages and self-assessments, filled out surveys, and were later contacted for a follow-up telephone survey. The statistical message was rated higher on information value and also resulted in decreased intention to tan, decreased tanning behavior, and increased perceived susceptibility to skin cancer. The narrative message, in contrast, increased perceptions of realism and also worked to decrease intentions to tan. Additionally, the self-assessment manipulation resulted in increased susceptibility and decreased intention to tan and post tanning behavior. Personality factors explained small portions of variance. Key limitations and directions for future research are also addressed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Health Belief Model: a decade later.
Janz, N. K., & Becker, M. H. (1984) · Health Education Quarterly · doi:10.1177/109019818401100101 · Cited by 8,437
Unrealistic optimism about future life events
Weinstein, N. D. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.806 · Cited by 4,999
Stalking the elusive “vividness” effect
Taylor, S. E., & Thompson, S. C. (1982) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.89.2.155 · Cited by 913 · cited 3×
“Taylor and Thompson (1982) suggest case studies may be more effective because readers underuse information presented in a statistical or strictly informational format.”
Background
Cited by
Impact of narratives on persuasion in health communication: a meta-analysis
Shen, F., Sheer, V. C., & Li, R. (2015) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2015.1018467 · Cited by 574
Braddock, K., & Dillard, J. P. (2016) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637751.2015.1128555 · Cited by 568
Brownson, R. C., Royer, C., Ewing, R., & McBride, T. D. (2006) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2005.10.004 · Cited by 439
Shaffer, V. A., & Zikmund-Fisher, B. J. (2013) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x12463266 · Cited by 167
An Intervention to Decrease Adolescent Indoor Tanning: A Multi-Method Pilot Study
Lazovich, D., Choi, K., Rolnick, C., Jackson, J. M., Forster, J., & Southwell, B. (2013) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.08.009 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- GREENE, K., & BRINN, L. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Health Communication
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 443-461
- ISSN
- 1081-0730 (ISSN-L)
- 1087-0415
- OpenAlex
- W2109936628
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 39.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Messages Influencing College Women's Tanning Bed Use: Statistical versus Narrative Evidence Format and a Self-Assessment to Increase Perceived Susceptibility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/713852118
- The paper
- GREENE, K., & BRINN, L. S. (2003). Messages Influencing College Women's Tanning Bed Use: Statistical versus Narrative Evidence Format and a Self-Assessment to Increase Perceived Susceptibility. Journal of Health Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/713852118
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.