Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 902

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pea protein isolates: Structure, extraction, and functionality

Lam, A. C. Y., Can Karaca, A., Tyler, R. T., Nickerson, M. T.·2018·Food Reviews International
DOI 10.1080/87559129.2016.1242135
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In keeping with emerging consumer trends, the food industry is continually searching for cheaper and healthier protein ingredients to replace those derived from animal sources (e.g., whey, casein, gelatin, and ovalbumin), gluten-based proteins (e.g., wheat), and soy. Pea protein shows promise in filling this niche because it is non-genetically modified organism (GMO), gluten-free, nutritious, and of low allergenicity. This review discusses structure–function relationships of pea protein isolates, the impact of extraction techniques used to produce the isolate, and the impact of cultivar and environment on ingredient performance in terms of solubility, water- and oil-holding capacities, emulsifying, foaming, and gelation properties.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/87559129.2016.1242135

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 88

  1. 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.06.012 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1002/jsfa.4738 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.foodres.2012.12.009 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.07.024 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.11.017 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.foodres.2009.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Olson, R.A.; Frey, K.J.Nutritional quality of cereal grains: genetics and agronomic improvement; American Society of Agronomy, Inc. Madison, WI, 1987; p 511. · DOI
  8. 10.1007/BF01091191 · DOI
  9. Tiwari, B.K.; Gowen, A.; McKenna, B.Processing, quality and nutraceutical applications; Elsevier Inc. London, UK, 2011, p 483.
  10. 10.1016/j.foodres.2009.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1300/J153v01n01_03 · DOI
  12. Sikorski, Z.E.Chemical and functional properties of food proteins; CRC Press LLC: Boca Raton, FL, 2001, p 504. · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1042/bj2070629 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2012.03.003 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1969.tb06416.x · DOI
  16. 10.1007/BF01091189 · DOI
  17. Vera C., 1999, final report to the Saskatchewan Agriculture Development Fund: Breeding field pea cultivars for Saskatchewan, 2000
  18. 10.5424/sjar/2009071-402 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.09.035 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.04.082 · DOI
  21. 10.1046/j.1439-037x.1999.00298.x · DOI
  22. 10.4141/cjps74-047 · DOI
  23. 10.4141/cjps74-039 · DOI
  24. 10.1021/jf00110a024 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00026-9 · DOI
  26. 10.1002/jsfa.2740330707 · DOI
  27. 10.1104/pp.75.3.651 · DOI
  28. 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.06-0149 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/BF00385164 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/1391051a0 · DOI
  31. 10.1002/pca.2800030202 · DOI
  32. 10.1042/bj1770509 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/0003-2697(66)90246-6 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1007/978-1-4419-1478-1 · DOI
  35. Hoang H.D., 2012, Evaluation of pea protein and modified pea protein as egg replacers (Doctoral dissertation)
  36. Anson M.L., 1957, U.S. Patent No. 2,785,155
  37. 10.1007/978-1-4613-1219-2 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1080/10408398.2010.482678 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Cone C.N., 1934, U.S. Patent No. 1,955,375
  40. Owusu-Ansuh Y.J., 1987, Technical project report to Saskatchewan Agriculture Development Fund and AgDevCo: Pea proteins: a review on chemistry, technology of production and utilization (Report No. R-86-08-0037)
  41. 10.1016/j.foodres.2009.07.021 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1016/j.ifset.2012.02.003 · DOI
  43. Murray E.D., 1978, Canada Patent No. 1,028,552
  44. 10.1002/jsfa.2740420304 · DOI
  45. Jain S.M., 1892, U.S. Patent No. 4,321,192
  46. Ahmed H., 2005, Principles and reactions of protein extraction, purification, and characterization
  47. 10.1002/food.19960400502 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/S0308-8146(99)00150-8 · DOI
  49. Smith A.K., 1966, Cereal Chem, 43, 261
  50. Damodaran, S.; Parkin, K.L.; Fennema, O.W.Fennema’s food chemistry(4thed.); Taylor & Francis Group, LLC: Boca Raton, FL, 2008; p 1160.
  51. 10.1080/09637480220132850 · DOI
  52. 10.1007/978-3-642-59116-7 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.01.030 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Withana-Gamage T.S., 2011, thermal and functional characterisation of protein isolates from Kabuli and Desi chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): a comparative study with soy (Glycine max) and pea (Pisum sativum L.). J. Sci. Food Agric., 91, 1022
  55. Vose J.R., 1980, Cereal Chem, 57, 406
  56. Walstra, P.Physical chemistry of foods; Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, NY, 2003; p 832. · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1007/s10068-015-0107-y · DOI
  58. 10.1016/S0260-8774(02)00241-8 · DOI
  59. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1987.tb14070.x · DOI
  60. Sanjeewa W.T., 2008, Physico-chemical properties of chickpea flour, starch and protein fractions and their utilization in low-fat pork bologna
  61. 10.1021/jf00018a012 · DOI
  62. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.tb07150.x · DOI · Paper page
  63. Dickinson E., 2010, B, 81, 130
  64. 10.1007/s11483-013-9313-4 · DOI
  65. 10.1016/j.cocis.2004.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1016/j.foodres.2009.07.022 · DOI
  67. 10.1021/jf902199x · DOI
  68. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1987.tb06607.x · DOI
  69. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.04.005 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1007/s11483-009-9125-8 · DOI
  71. Tsoukala A., 2006, B, 53, 203
  72. 10.1016/j.cocis.2010.05.017 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1016/0308-8146(81)90033-9 · DOI · Paper page
  74. 10.1016/S0268-005X(01)00052-2 · DOI
  75. Corredig M., In Ingredient Interactions: Effects on Food Quality
  76. 10.1201/b15995-9 · DOI
  77. O’Kane F.E., 2004, 2. Consequences of compositional heterogeneity on heat-induced gelation behavior. J. Agric. Food Chem., 52, 3149
  78. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.03.008 · DOI
  79. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.03.018 · DOI
  80. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2012.11.004 · DOI
  81. Foegeding E.A., 1853, Food Hydrocolloids, 2010
  82. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.11.025 · DOI · Paper page
  83. Koyoro H., 1987, Cereal Chem, 64, 97
  84. 10.1002/food.19860300332 · DOI
  85. Zs. Cserhalmi, 1998, Acta Aliment, 27, 357
  86. 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)89046-9 · DOI · Paper page
  87. 10.1016/0031-9422(79)83077-0 · DOI
  88. 10.1021/jf801721b · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lam, A. C. Y., Can Karaca, A., Tyler, R. T., & Nickerson, M. T.
Venue
Food Reviews International
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2016-12-18
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
126-147
ISSN
  • 1525-6103 (ISSN-L)
  • 8755-9129
DOI
10.1080/87559129.2016.1242135
OpenAlex
W2524849702
Cited by
902
References
7
FWCI
17.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Funders
  • Saskatchewan Pulse Growers (SPCD-BPRO 1201)
  • Saskatchewan Agriculture Development Fund (2011-0133)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.