Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

From first words to grammar in children with focal brain injury

Bates, Elizabeth, Thal, Donna, Trauner, Doris, Fenson, Judi, Aram, Dorothy, Eisele, Julie, Nass, Ruth·1997·Developmental Neuropsychology

Abstract

The effects of focal brain injury were investigated in the first stages of language development, during the passage from first words to grammar. Parent report, free‐speech data, or both are reported for 53 infants and preschool children between 10 and 44 months of age. All children had suffered a single, unilateral brain injury to the left or right hemisphere, incurred before 6 months of age (usually in the pre‐ or perinatal period). This is the period in which one would expect to see maximal plasticity, but it is also the period in which the initial specializations of particular cortical regions ought to be most evident. In direct contradiction of hypotheses based on the adult aphasia literature, results from 10 to 17 months suggest that children with right‐hemisphere injuries are at greater risk for delays in word comprehension and in the gestures that normally precede and accompany language onset. Although there were no differences between left‐ and right‐hemisphere injury per se on expressive language, children whose lesions included the left‐temporal lobe showed significantly greater delays in expressive vocabulary and grammar throughout the period from 10 to 44 month s. No specific deficits were associated with left‐frontal damage, but there was a significant effect of frontal lobe injury to either hemisphere in the period from 16 to 31 months, when normal children usually show a burst in vocabulary and grammar. This bilateral effect of frontal damage is independent of motor impairment. Hence, there are specific effects of lesion site in early language development, but they are consistent neither with the lesion‐syndrome correlations observed in adults with homologous injuries nor with the literature on acquired lesions in older children. Results are used to argue against innate localization of linguistic representations, and in favor of an alternative view in which innate regional biases in style of information processing lead to familiar patterns of brain organization for language under normal conditions and permit alternative patterns to emerge in children with focal brain injury.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/87565649709540682

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Bates, E., Thal, D., Trauner, D., Fenson, J., Aram, D., Eisele, J., & Nass, R.
Venue
Developmental Neuropsychology
Published
1997-01
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
275-343
ISSN
  • 1532-6942 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-5641
OpenAlex
W2070728655
Cited by
258
References
8
FWCI
24.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.