Cited by 22EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningAcademic Writing and PublishingInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fostering master’s students’ metacognition and self-regulation practices for research writing

Abstract

Proficiency in writing is crucial for success in graduate school. While doctoral student writing has received attention in the research literature, little research has focused on master's student writing. Master's students need to be skilled writers in their professional lives, and have the same if not greater need for writing instruction as other graduate students. When writing is taught in graduate school, the instruction often focuses on content and text, not on the writing context and process. Recent research on academic writing suggests the importance of focusing on the behaviors, motivations, and cognitions that surround student writing, especially metacognitive awareness and self-regulation of the writing processes. This qualitative case study examined MA TESOL students’ reactions to classroom activities designed to teach metacognitive awareness of writing strategies, self-regulation of writing practices, and text strategies. Data collected included surveys and students’ writing plans. Five themes emerged from the data analysis. Students benefitted from: Increased metacognitive awareness of writing practices, the focus on the social support of writing, the opportunity to review peers’ papers, discussion of the stress points around writing, and instruction about the text structures underlying academic writing. Suggestions for application of instructional practices to other writing programs are included.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/87567555.2018.1446898

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1023/B:IHIE.0000018908.36113.a5 · DOI
  2. 10.1080/13562510600680574 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1080/13562510801923229 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/146879410100100307 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1080/13562517.2014.945160 · DOI
  6. Bair M. A., 2013, Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 10
  7. Belcher W. L, 2009, Writing Your Journal Article in 12 Weeks
  8. 10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6%3c740::AID-SCE4%3e3.0.CO;2-3 · DOI
  9. Chisholm R. M., 1991, Journal on Writing Across the Curriculum, 3, 4
  10. 10.1080/10494820802292386 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/13562517.2011.560381 · DOI
  12. Creswell J. W., 2013, Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design : Choosing among Five Approaches
  13. Fergie G., 2011, International Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, 23, 236
  14. 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.004 · DOI
  15. Graff G., 2010, They Say / I Say : The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing
  16. 10.18552/joaw.v1i1.25 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/13562510020029608 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/13562517.2014.974025 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/00228958.2006.10516456 · DOI
  20. 10.1177/0741088312438529 · DOI
  21. 10.1080/87567550309596408 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Nilson L. B., 2013, Creating Self-Regulated Learners: Strategies to Strengthen Students’ Self-Awareness and Learning Skills
  23. 10.2466/pms.2001.92.2.560 · DOI
  24. 10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1080/13562517.2011.641008 · DOI
  26. Saladaña J, 2015, The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers
  27. 10.1080/87567555.2010.511315 · DOI
  28. 10.1023/A:1007532302043 · DOI
  29. Silvia P. J., 2007, How to Write a Lot: A Practical Guide to Productive Academic Writing
  30. Simpson S., 2012, WPA Journal, 36, 95
  31. Singleton-Jackson J., 2009, Current Issues in Education, 121, 1
  32. 10.1215/15314200-1-1-176 · DOI
  33. Swales J. M., 2004, Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills, 1
  34. 10.1007/BF03179901 · DOI
  35. 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02064.x · DOI
  36. 10.1080/13562511003619961 · DOI
  37. Yin R. K., 2013, Case Study Research: Design and Methods
  38. 10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.03.004 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 22

Metadata

Authors
Santelmann, L. M., Stevens, D. D., & Martin, S. B.
Affiliations
Portland State University (US)
Corresponding author
Santelmann, Lynn M.
Venue
College Teaching
Published
2018-04-04
Volume
66
Issue
3
Pages
111-123
ISSN
  • 1930-8299 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-7555
OpenAlex
W3122821831
Cited by
22
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
11.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • College Teaching (publishedVersion)
  • PDXScholar (Portland State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
metacognition, student self-regulation, academic writing, graduate student writing, master's students, TESOL students, writing instruction, writing strategies, textual strategies, peer review, writing plan, text structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fostering master’s students’ metacognition and self-regulation practices for research writing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/87567555.2018.1446898
The paper
Santelmann, L. M., Stevens, D. D., & Martin, S. B. (2018). Fostering master’s students’ metacognition and self-regulation practices for research writing. College Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2018.1446898