The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dynamics of capping protein and actin assembly in vitro: uncapping barbed ends by polyphosphoinositides.
Open accessAbstract
Bursts of actin polymerization in vivo involve the transient appearance of free barbed ends. To determine how rapidly barbed ends might appear and how long they might remain free in vivo, we studied the kinetics of capping protein, the major barbed end capper, binding to barbed ends in vitro. First, the off-rate constant for capping protein leaving a barbed end is slow, predicting a half-life for a capped barbed end of approximately 30 min. This half-life implies that cells cannot wait for capping protein to spontaneously dissociate from capped barbed ends in order to create free barbed ends. However, we find that phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) and phosphatidylinositol 4-mono-phosphate (PIP) cause rapid and efficient dissociation of capping protein from capped filaments. PIP2 is a strong candidate for a second messenger regulating actin polymerization; therefore, the ability of PIP2 to remove capping protein from barbed ends is a potential mechanism for stimulating actin polymerization in vivo. Second, the on-rate constant for capping protein binding to free barbed ends predicts that actin filaments could grow to the length of filaments observed in vivo during one lifetime. Third, capping protein beta-subunit isoforms did not differ in their actin binding properties, even in tests with different actin isoforms. A major hypothesis for why capping protein beta-subunit isoforms exist is thereby excluded. Fourth, the proposed capping protein regulators, Hsc70 and S100, had no effect on capping protein binding to actin in vitro.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Blanchoin, L., Amann, K. J., Higgs, H. N., Marchand, J.-B., Kaiser, D. A., & Pollard, T. D. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35010008 · Cited by 586
Martin, T. F. J. (1998) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.14.1.231 · Cited by 522
Lamellipodial Versus Filopodial Mode of the Actin Nanomachinery
Mejillano, M. R., Kojima, S.-I., Applewhite, D. A., Gertler, F. B., Svitkina, T. M., & Borisy, G. G. (2004) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.019 · Cited by 420
Control of actin dynamics in cell motility
Carlier, M.-F., & Pantaloni, D. (1997) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1997.1062 · Cited by 351
Pyle, W. G., & Solaro, R. J. (2004) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/01.res.0000116143.74830.a9 · Cited by 246
The sarcomeric Z-disc: a nodal point in signalling and disease
Frank, D., Kuhn, C., Katus, H. A., & Frey, N. (2006) · Journal of Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00109-005-0033-1 · Cited by 235
F-Actin Cytoskeleton Network Self-Organization Through Competition and Cooperation
Kadzik, R. S., Homa, K. E., & Kovar, D. R. (2020) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-032320-094706 · Cited by 120
Mechanistic principles underlying regulation of the actin cytoskeleton by phosphoinositides
Senju, Y., Kalimeri, M., Koskela, E. V., Somerharju, P., Zhao, H., Vattulainen, I., & Lappalainen, P. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1705032114 · Cited by 118
Unravelling the actin cytoskeleton: a new competitive edge?
Davidson, A. J., & Wood, W. (2016) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2016.04.001 · Cited by 110
Hinchliffe (1998) · doi:10.1016/s0005-2760(98)00140-4 · Cited by 110
Rho A and Rac1: Antagonists moving forward
Salloum, G., Jaafar, L., & El-Sibai, M. (2020) · Tissue and Cell · doi:10.1016/j.tice.2020.101364 · Cited by 36
Wang, D., Ye, Z., Wei, W., Yu, J., Huang, L., Zhang, H., & Yue, J. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.65910 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Schafer, D. A., Jennings, P. B., & Cooper, J. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of cell biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1996-10-01
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 169-179
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2157151771
- Cited by
- 427
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.