The DOI matches its Crossref record.
SUMO-1 Modification and Its Role in Targeting the Ran GTPase-activating Protein, RanGAP1, to the Nuclear Pore Complex
Open accessAbstract
RanGAP1 is the GTPase-activating protein for Ran, a small ras-like GTPase involved in regulating nucleocytoplasmic transport. In vertebrates, RanGAP1 is present in two forms: one that is cytoplasmic, and another that is concentrated at the cytoplasmic fibers of nuclear pore complexes (NPCs). The NPC-associated form of RanGAP1 is covalently modified by the small ubiquitin-like protein, SUMO-1, and we have recently proposed that SUMO-1 modification functions to target RanGAP1 to the NPC. Here, we identify the domain of RanGAP1 that specifies SUMO-1 modification and demonstrate that mutations in this domain that inhibit modification also inhibit targeting to the NPC. Targeting of a heterologous protein to the NPC depended on determinants specifying SUMO-1 modification and also on additional determinants in the COOH-terminal domain of RanGAP1. SUMO-1 modification and these additional determinants were found to specify interaction between the COOH-terminal domain of RanGAP1 and a region of the nucleoporin, Nup358, between Ran-binding domains three and four. Together, these findings indicate that SUMO-1 modification targets RanGAP1 to the NPC by exposing, or creating, a Nup358 binding site in the COOH-terminal domain of RanGAP1. Surprisingly, the COOH-terminal domain of RanGAP1 was also found to harbor a nuclear localization signal. This nuclear localization signal, and the presence of nine leucine-rich nuclear export signal motifs, suggests that RanGAP1 may shuttle between the nucleus and the cytoplasm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Apg10p, a novel protein‐conjugating enzyme essential for autophagy in yeast
Shintani, T., Mizushima, N., Ogawa, Y., Matsuura, A., Noda, T., & Ohsumi, Y. (1999) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/18.19.5234 · Cited by 269
Sumoylation increases HIF-1α stability and its transcriptional activity
Bae, S.-H., Jeong, J.-W., Park, J. A., Kim, S.-H., Bae, M.-K., Choi, S.-J., & Kim, K.-W. (2004) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.09.068 · Cited by 232
Comerford, K. M., Leonard, M. O., Karhausen, J., Carey, R., Colgan, S. P., & Taylor, C. T. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0337412100 · Cited by 185
Epsins: adaptors in endocytosis?
Wendland, B. (2002) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm970 · Cited by 143
The Nup358-RanGAP Complex Is Required for Efficient Importin α/β-dependent Nuclear Import
Hutten, S., Flotho, A., Melchior, F., & Kehlenbach, R. H. (2008) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e07-12-1279 · Cited by 140
Beads-on-a-String, Characterization of Ets-1 Sumoylated within Its Flexible N-terminal Sequence
Macauley, M. S., Errington, W. J., Schärpf, M., Mackereth, C. D., Blaszczak, A. G., Graves, B. J., & McIntosh, L. P. (2006) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m510488200 · Cited by 36
Baytshtok, V., DiMattia, M. A., & Lima, C. D. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61694-1 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Matunis, M. J., Wu, J., & Blobel, G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1998-02-09
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 499-509
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2160231441
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.