Cited by 154

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pincher, a pinocytic chaperone for nerve growth factor/TrkA signaling endosomes

Shao, Yufang, Akmentin, Wendy, Toledo-Aral, Juan Jose, Rosenbaum, Julie, Valdez, Gregorio, Cabot, John B., Hilbush, Brian S., Halegoua, Simon·2002·The Journal of Cell Biology

Abstract

Acentral tenet of nerve growth factor (NGF) action that is poorly understood is its ability to mediate cytoplasmic signaling, through its receptor TrkA, that is initiated at the nerve terminal and conveyed to the soma. We identified an NGF-induced protein that we termed Pincher (pinocytic chaperone) that mediates endocytosis and trafficking of NGF and its receptor TrkA. In PC12 cells, overexpression of Pincher dramatically stimulated NGF-induced endocytosis of TrkA, unexpectedly at sites of clathrin-independent macropinocytosis within cell surface ruffles. Subsequently, a system of Pincher-containing tubules mediated the delivery of NGF/TrkA-containing vesicles to cytoplasmic accumulations. These vesicles selectively and persistently mediated TrkA-erk5 mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling. A dominant inhibitory mutant form of Pincher inhibited the NGF-induced endocytosis of TrkA, and selectively blocked TrkA-mediated cytoplasmic signaling of erk5, but not erk1/2, kinases. Our results indicate that Pincher mediates pinocytic endocytosis of functionally specialized NGF/TrkA endosomes with persistent signaling potential.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.200201063

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 1997, J. Neurosci., 17, 7007, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-18-07007.1997 · DOI
  2. 2001, Mol. Cell. Biol., 21, 2695, 10.1128/MCB.21.8.2695-2705.2001 · DOI
  3. 1987, Neurochem. Res., 12, 861, 10.1007/BF00966307 · DOI
  4. 1993, Mol. Cell. Biol., 13, 3146
  5. 1995, J. Cell Biol., 130, 149, 10.1083/jcb.130.1.149 · DOI
  6. 2001, Nat Cell Biol, 3, 573, 10.1038/35078549 · DOI
  7. 1976, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 73, 2424, 10.1073/pnas.73.7.2424 · DOI
  8. 1996, J. Neurosci., 16, 7950, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-24-07950.1996 · DOI
  9. 1991, Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol., 165, 119
  10. 1992, Neuron., 9, 883, 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90241-5 · DOI
  11. 2001, Neuron., 32, 801, 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00526-8 · DOI
  12. 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 36707, 10.1074/jbc.274.51.36707 · DOI
  13. 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 43103, 10.1074/jbc.M106128200 · DOI
  14. 1987, Science., 237, 1154, 10.1126/science.3306916 · DOI
  15. 2001, Nat. Cell Biol., 3, 567, 10.1038/35078543 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 1996, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 12, 575, 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.12.1.575 · DOI
  17. 2001, Neuron., 32, 767, 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00529-3 · DOI
  18. 1998, J. Neurosci. Res., 51, 463, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19980215)51:4<463::AID-JNR6>3.0.CO;2-A · DOI
  19. 1995, J. Histochem. Cytochem., 43, 283, 10.1177/43.3.7532656 · DOI
  20. 2000, Genomics., 63, 255, 10.1006/geno.1999.6087 · DOI
  21. 2000, Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev., 33, 169, 10.1016/S0165-0173(00)00028-X · DOI
  22. 1997, Science., 277, 1097, 10.1126/science.277.5329.1097 · DOI
  23. 1999, Science., 286, 2358, 10.1126/science.286.5448.2358 · DOI
  24. 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 33054, 10.1074/jbc.M009913200 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 34933, 10.1074/jbc.273.52.34933 · DOI
  26. 1996, Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 19, 463, 10.1146/annurev.ne.19.030196.002335 · DOI
  27. 1994, Neuron., 12, 691, 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90223-2 · DOI
  28. 2000, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 97, 1976, 10.1073/pnas.040537997 · DOI
  29. 1995, Trends Cell Biol, 5, 424, 10.1016/S0962-8924(00)89101-1 · DOI
  30. 1999, J Neurosci, 19, 7889, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-18-07889.1999 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 2001, Nat Neurosci, 4, 981, 10.1038/nn720 · DOI
  32. 2001, J. Neurosci., 21, 5406, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-15-05406.2001 · DOI
  33. 2000, J Neurosci, 20, 5671, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-15-05671.2000 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shao, Y., Akmentin, W., Toledo-Aral, J. J., Rosenbaum, J., Valdez, G., Cabot, J. B., Hilbush, B. S., & Halegoua, S.
Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794
  • 2Digital Gene Technologies Inc., La Jolla, CA 92037
Venue
The Journal of Cell Biology
Published
2002-05-13
Volume
157
Issue
4
Pages
679-691
ISSN
  • 1540-8140
  • 0021-9525
Cited by
154
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review