CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 267Cellular transport and secretionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantitative analysis of the native presynaptic cytomatrix by cryoelectron tomography

Open access
Fernández-Busnadiego, Rubén, Zuber, Benoît, Maurer, Ulrike Elisabeth, Cyrklaff, Marek, Baumeister, Wolfgang, Lučić, Vladan·2010·Journal of Cell Biology
DOI 10.1083/jcb.200908082PMC PMC2812849
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The presynaptic terminal contains a complex network of filaments whose precise organization and functions are not yet understood. The cryoelectron tomography experiments reported in this study indicate that these structures play a prominent role in synaptic vesicle release. Docked synaptic vesicles did not make membrane to membrane contact with the active zone but were instead linked to it by tethers of different length. Our observations are consistent with an exocytosis model in which vesicles are first anchored by long (>5 nm) tethers that give way to multiple short tethers once vesicles enter the readily releasable pool. The formation of short tethers was inhibited by tetanus toxin, indicating that it depends on soluble N-ethyl-maleimide sensitive fusion protein attachment protein receptor complex assembly. Vesicles were extensively interlinked via a set of connectors that underwent profound rearrangements upon synaptic stimulation and okadaic acid treatment, suggesting a role of these connectors in synaptic vesicle mobilization and neurotransmitter release.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.200908082

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1. Presynaptic morphology visualized in tomograms of frozen-hydrated synapses. (A) Untreated synaptosome. (A, I) Connector linking two vesicles (black arrowhead). (A, II) Tether linking a vesicle to the AZ (white arrowhead; same vesicles as in A [I] at another z slice). (B) OA-treated synaptosome showing presynaptic actin bundles (black arrows). (C) Organotypic slice. Synaptic vesicles are compressed along the cutting direction (white arrows in C and D). (C, I) Connector linking two vesicles (black arrowhead). (C, II) Tethers linking a vesicle to the AZ (white arrowheads). (D) Postsynaptic terminal showing actin filaments (black arrows). Tomographic slices are 2.7-nm thick. Insets show magnified views of boxed areas. SV, synaptic vesicle; mit, mitochondrion; MT, microtubule; SC, synaptic cleft; PSD, postsynaptic density. Bars: (main panels) 100 nm; (insets) 50 nm.
Figure 1. Presynaptic morphology visualized in tomograms of frozen-hydrated synapses. (A) Untreated synaptosome. (A, I) Connector linking two vesicles (black arrowhead). (A, II) Tether linking a vesicle to the AZ (white arrowhead; same vesicles as in A [I] at another z slice). (B) OA-treated synaptosome showing presynaptic actin bundles (black arrows). (C) Organotypic slice. Synaptic vesicles are compressed along the cutting direction (white arrows in C and D). (C, I) Connector linking two vesicles (black arrowhead). (C, II) Tethers linking a vesicle to the AZ (white arrowheads). (D) Postsynaptic terminal showing actin filaments (black arrows). Tomographic slices are 2.7-nm thick. Insets show magnified views of boxed areas. SV, synaptic vesicle; mit, mitochondrion; MT, microtubule; SC, synaptic cleft; PSD, postsynaptic density. Bars: (main panels) 100 nm; (insets) 50 nm.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 2. Segmentation procedure. (A) 2.7-nm-thick tomographic slice of a 100-mM HTS-treated synaptosome. The dashed line indicates the analyzed area (first 250 nm from the AZ). (B) 3D segmentation of synaptic vesicles (yellow), AZ (gray), synaptic vesicle connectors (red), and synaptic vesicle tethers (blue). Boxed regions are magnified in C and D. (C and D, top) Tomographic slices showing a synaptic vesicle connector (C) and a tether (D) and their 3D visualization as detected by the automated segmentation procedure (bottom). Bars: (A) 200 nm; (C and D) 50 nm.
Figure 2. Segmentation procedure. (A) 2.7-nm-thick tomographic slice of a 100-mM HTS-treated synaptosome. The dashed line indicates the analyzed area (first 250 nm from the AZ). (B) 3D segmentation of synaptic vesicles (yellow), AZ (gray), synaptic vesicle connectors (red), and synaptic vesicle tethers (blue). Boxed regions are magnified in C and D. (C and D, top) Tomographic slices showing a synaptic vesicle connector (C) and a tether (D) and their 3D visualization as detected by the automated segmentation procedure (bottom). Bars: (A) 200 nm; (C and D) 50 nm.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 3. Synaptic vesicle distribution within presynaptic terminals depicted as the fraction of cytoplasmic volume occupied by vesicles. (A) Representative traces of individual synapses. (B) Vesicle concentration for the first 250 nm from the AZ. (C) Vesicle concentration versus distance to the AZ. Plots show mean values and SEM (error bars). The confidence values are indicated by * and ** for P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively. The number of presynaptic terminals analyzed for each treatment is shown in Table S1.
Figure 3. Synaptic vesicle distribution within presynaptic terminals depicted as the fraction of cytoplasmic volume occupied by vesicles. (A) Representative traces of individual synapses. (B) Vesicle concentration for the first 250 nm from the AZ. (C) Vesicle concentration versus distance to the AZ. Plots show mean values and SEM (error bars). The confidence values are indicated by * and ** for P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively. The number of presynaptic terminals analyzed for each treatment is shown in Table S1.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 4. Synaptic vesicle connectors. (A) Fraction of connected vesicles for the first 250 nm from the AZ. (B) Fraction of connected vesicles versus distance to the AZ. (C) Number of connectors per connected vesicle versus distance to the AZ. (D) Connector length for the first 250 nm from the AZ. (E) Connector length versus distance to the AZ. Plots show mean values and SEM (error bars). The confidence values are indicated by *, **, and *** for P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001, respectively. The numbers of vesicles (A and B) and connectors (C–E) analyzed for each treatment are shown in Table S1.
Figure 4. Synaptic vesicle connectors. (A) Fraction of connected vesicles for the first 250 nm from the AZ. (B) Fraction of connected vesicles versus distance to the AZ. (C) Number of connectors per connected vesicle versus distance to the AZ. (D) Connector length for the first 250 nm from the AZ. (E) Connector length versus distance to the AZ. Plots show mean values and SEM (error bars). The confidence values are indicated by *, **, and *** for P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001, respectively. The numbers of vesicles (A and B) and connectors (C–E) analyzed for each treatment are shown in Table S1.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 5. Images of synaptic vesicle tethers. (A–D) Short (A and B; <5 nm) and long (C and D; >5 nm) synaptic vesicle tethers (white arrowheads) are shown. SC, synaptic cleft. Two consecutive 2.7-nm-thick tomographic slices are shown for each case. Bar, 50 nm.
Figure 5. Images of synaptic vesicle tethers. (A–D) Short (A and B; <5 nm) and long (C and D; >5 nm) synaptic vesicle tethers (white arrowheads) are shown. SC, synaptic cleft. Two consecutive 2.7-nm-thick tomographic slices are shown for each case. Bar, 50 nm.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 6. Synaptic vesicle tethers. (A) Fraction of proximal synaptic vesicles tethered to the AZ. (B) Mean number of tethers per tethered synaptic vesicle. Untreated RRP and untreated non-RRP: tethered vesicles with more than two and up to two tethers in untreated synaptosomes, respectively. (C) Tether length for all tethered vesicles. (D) Fraction of proximal synaptic vesicles as a function of tethering and connectivity. Plots show mean values and SEM (error bars). The confidence values are indicated by *** for P < 0.001. The numbers of vesicles (A, B, and D) and tethers (C) analyzed for each treatment are shown in Table S1.
Figure 6. Synaptic vesicle tethers. (A) Fraction of proximal synaptic vesicles tethered to the AZ. (B) Mean number of tethers per tethered synaptic vesicle. Untreated RRP and untreated non-RRP: tethered vesicles with more than two and up to two tethers in untreated synaptosomes, respectively. (C) Tether length for all tethered vesicles. (D) Fraction of proximal synaptic vesicles as a function of tethering and connectivity. Plots show mean values and SEM (error bars). The confidence values are indicated by *** for P < 0.001. The numbers of vesicles (A, B, and D) and tethers (C) analyzed for each treatment are shown in Table S1.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 7. Direct membrane contact between synaptic vesicles and the AZ. (A–C, left) 2.7-nm-thick tomographic slices and the corresponding direct 3D rendering of the EM densities (right) are shown. (A) Synaptic vesicle with an open neck, which establishes continuity between the vesicular lumen and the extracellular space. An L-shaped density is visible close to the neck (blue arrowhead). (B) Synaptic vesicle making membrane contact with an invagination of the AZ. An L-shaped density is present close to the AZ invagination (blue arrowhead). (C) Regions of the AZ with high concave curvature (white arrowheads), which are likely signatures of full-collapse fusion events. Yellow, synaptic vesicles; red, synaptic vesicle connectors; gray, AZ; blue, synaptic vesicle–associated densities; green, other AZ densities. SC, synaptic cleft. Bars, 50 nm.
Figure 7. Direct membrane contact between synaptic vesicles and the AZ. (A–C, left) 2.7-nm-thick tomographic slices and the corresponding direct 3D rendering of the EM densities (right) are shown. (A) Synaptic vesicle with an open neck, which establishes continuity between the vesicular lumen and the extracellular space. An L-shaped density is visible close to the neck (blue arrowhead). (B) Synaptic vesicle making membrane contact with an invagination of the AZ. An L-shaped density is present close to the AZ invagination (blue arrowhead). (C) Regions of the AZ with high concave curvature (white arrowheads), which are likely signatures of full-collapse fusion events. Yellow, synaptic vesicles; red, synaptic vesicle connectors; gray, AZ; blue, synaptic vesicle–associated densities; green, other AZ densities. SC, synaptic cleft. Bars, 50 nm.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 66 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 267

Related

Metadata

Authors
Fernández-Busnadiego, R., Zuber, B., Maurer, U. E., Cyrklaff, M., Baumeister, W., & Lučić, V.
Affiliations
  • Department of Molecular Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany 1
  • MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology (GB)
  • Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry (DE)
Corresponding author
Baumeister, Wolfgang
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Cell Biology
Publisher
Rockefeller University Press
Published
2010-01-11
Volume
188
Issue
1
Pages
145-156
ISSN
  • 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8140
DOI
10.1083/jcb.200908082
PMC
PMC2812849
OpenAlex
W2132214171
Cited by
267
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 16
FWCI
8.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • The Journal of Cell Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
synaptic vesicle release, docked vesicles, exocytosis, readily releasable pool, tetanus toxin, SNARE complex, okadaic acid, synaptic stimulation, neurotransmitter release, active zone, cryo-electron tomography
MeSH terms
Animals, Male, Synapses, Rats, Wistar, Tissue Culture Techniques, Rats, Electron Microscope Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review