The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A cation counterflux supports lysosomal acidification
Open accessAbstract
The profound luminal acidification essential for the degradative function of lysosomes requires a counter-ion flux to dissipate an opposing voltage that would prohibit proton accumulation. It has generally been assumed that a parallel anion influx is the main or only counter-ion transport that enables acidification. Indeed, defective anion conductance has been suggested as the mechanism underlying attenuated lysosome acidification in cells deficient in CFTR or ClC-7. To assess the individual contribution of counter-ions to acidification, we devised means of reversibly and separately permeabilizing the plasma and lysosomal membranes to dialyze the cytosol and lysosome lumen in intact cells, while ratiometrically monitoring lysosomal pH. Replacement of cytosolic Cl− with impermeant anions did not significantly alter proton pumping, while the presence of permeant cations in the lysosomal lumen supported acidification. Accordingly, the lysosomes were found to acidify to the same pH in both CFTR- and ClC-7–deficient cells. We conclude that cations, in addition to chloride, can support lysosomal acidification and defects in lysosomal anion conductance cannot explain the impaired microbicidal capacity of CF phagocytes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Cl-/H+ antiporter ClC-7 is the primary chloride permeation pathway in lysosomes
Graves, A. R., Curran, P. K., Smith, C. L., & Mindell, J. A. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06907 · Cited by 399
Cited by
Zoncu, R., Bar-Peled, L., Efeyan, A., Wang, S., Sancak, Y., & Sabatini, D. M. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1207056 · Cited by 1,673
Lysosomal acidification mechanisms
Mindell, J. A. (2012) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-012110-142317 · Cited by 1,258
Transcriptional control of autophagy-lysosome function drives pancreatic cancer metabolism
Perera, R. M., Stoykova, S., Nicolay, B. N., Ross, K. N., Fitamant, J., Boukhali, M., Lengrand, J., Deshpande, V., Selig, M. K., Ferrone, C. R., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14587 · Cited by 799
Triggered recruitment of ESCRT machinery promotes endolysosomal repair
Skowyra, M. L., Schlesinger, P. H., Naismith, T. V., & Hanson, P. I. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar5078 · Cited by 578
Colacurcio, D. J., & Nixon, R. A. (2016) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2016.05.004 · Cited by 548
Metadata
- Authors
- Steinberg, B. E., Huynh, K. K., Brodovitch, A., Jabs, S., Stauber, T., Jentsch, T. J., & Grinstein, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 2010-06-21
- Volume
- 189
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1171-1186
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2143695671
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A cation counterflux supports lysosomal acidification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.200911083
- The paper
- Steinberg, B. E., Huynh, K. K., Brodovitch, A., Jabs, S., Stauber, T., Jentsch, T. J., & Grinstein, S. (2010). A cation counterflux supports lysosomal acidification. Journal of Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200911083
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.