The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Resting Memory CD8+ T Cells are Hyperreactive to Antigenic Challenge In Vitro
Open accessAbstract
The characteristics of CD8+ T cells responsible for memory responses are still largely unknown. Particularly, it has not been determined whether different activation thresholds distinguish naive from memory CD8+ T cell populations. In most experimental systems, heterogeneous populations of primed CD8+ T cells can be identified in vivo after immunization. These cells differ in terms of cell cycle status, surface phenotype, and/or effector function. This heterogeneity has made it difficult to assess the activation threshold and the relative role of these subpopulations in memory responses. In this study we have used F5 T cell receptor transgenic mice to generate a homogeneous population of primed CD8+ T cells. In the F5 transgenic mice, peptide injection in vivo leads to activation of most peripheral CD8+ T cells. In vivo BrdU labeling has been used to follow primed T cells over time periods spanning several weeks after peptide immunization. Our results show that the majority of primed CD8+ T cells generated in this system are not cycling and express increased levels of CD44 and Ly6C. These cells remain responsive to secondary peptide challenge in vivo as evidenced by short term upregulation of activation markers such as CD69 and CD44. The activation thresholds of naive and primed CD8+ T cells were compared in vitro. We found that CD8+ T cells from primed mice are activated by peptide concentrations 10–50-fold lower than naive mice. In addition, the kinetics of interleukin 2Rα chain upregulation by primed CD8+ T cells differ from naive CD8+ T cells. These primed hyperresponsive CD8+ T cells might play an important role in the memory response.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Immunological memory and protective immunity: understanding their relation
Ahmed, R., & Gray, D. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.272.5258.54 · Cited by 1,775 · cited 2×
“T cell memory is believed to result from an increase in the frequency of antigen specific T lymphocytes (1, 2).”
Turnover of naive- and memory-phenotype T cells.
Tough, D. F., & Sprent, J. (1994) · The Journal of experimental medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.179.4.1127 · Cited by 869
Cited by
Fibrinogen-like Protein 1 Is a Major Immune Inhibitory Ligand of LAG-3
Wang, J., Sanmamed, M. F., Datar, I., Su, T. T., Ji, L., Sun, J., Chen, L., Chen, Y., Zhu, G., Yin, W., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.010 · Cited by 871
Dutton, R. W., Bradley, L. M., & Swain, S. L. (1998) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.16.1.201 · Cited by 832
Generation and maintenance of memory CD4+ T Cells
van Leeuwen, E. M., Sprent, J., & Surh, C. D. (2009) · Current Opinion in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.coi.2009.02.005 · Cited by 300
Selin, L. K., Varga, S. M., Wong, I. C., & Welsh, R. M. (1998) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.188.9.1705 · Cited by 273
Christensen, J. E., Andreasen, S. Ø., Christensen, J. P., & Thomsen, A. R. (2001) · International Immunology · doi:10.1093/intimm/13.4.593 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Pihlgren, M., Dubois, P. M., Tomkowiak, M., Sjögren, T., & Marvel, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Experimental Medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1996-12-01
- Volume
- 184
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2141-2152
- ISSN
- 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9538
- OpenAlex
- W2102551327
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resting Memory CD8+ T Cells are Hyperreactive to Antigenic Challenge In Vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.184.6.2141
- The paper
- Pihlgren, M., Dubois, P. M., Tomkowiak, M., Sjögren, T., & Marvel, J. (1996). Resting Memory CD8+ T Cells are Hyperreactive to Antigenic Challenge In Vitro. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.184.6.2141
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.